Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

MENATA KEMBALI PRINSIP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA: SEBUAH GAGASAN MENCAPAI IDEALITAS Arsyad, Yusna; M. Wantu, Fence; Ismail, Dian Ekawaty
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v6i2.4438

Abstract

The purpose of this research is twofold: first, to provide a conceptualization of restorative justice principles in Indonesia's criminal justice system; and second, to examine the problematic application of these concepts in that system. Normative legal research, specifically the statutory technique and the conceptual approach, are utilized in this study piece. On top of that, the processed legal materials were analyzed using a qualitative analytical method that relies on interpretation. According to this study's findings, the judicial subsystem in Indonesia, which includes the police, the prosecutor's office, and the Supreme Court, has started to implement the notion of restorative justice. Due to the lack of a legislation governing the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia, institutional or partial rules and guidelines continue to be used when discussing its application. This brings up the issue of sub-system authority imbalance in the criminal justice system, as well as the lack of consistent guidelines for each sub-system to apply restorative justice. As a result, the various proportional institutions within each sub-system face legal uncertainty. Thus, in order to establish legal clarity on the implementation of restorative justice, Indonesia has to enact legislation that specifically addresses this concept, known as RKUHAP.
Collocation of restorative justice with human rights in Indonesia Ismail, Dian Ekawaty; Arsyad, Yusna; Ahmad, Ahmad; Nggilu, Novendri M.; Yassine Chami
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 32 No. 2 (2024): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v32i2.35374

Abstract

Applying restorative justice in Indonesia is beset by obstacles like a lack of knowledge, inadequate infrastructure, and opposition from law enforcement, especially when human rights considerations are incorporated into the process. For this reason, the relationship between these two elements is worth examining. This paper explores and analyses the integration or synthesis of restorative justice with human rights in Indonesia. This paper employs a normative approach with prescriptive analysis based on studies of legislation and cases that integrate the principles of restorative justice with human rights. The findings indicate that collocation helps understand how grammatical structures can reflect and influence the interpretation of restorative justice in human rights, particularly in legal texts and policy reports. In Indonesia, restorative justice can be used in conjunction with the enforcement of human rights laws, particularly when addressing grave human rights breaches, since it emphasizes balanced reconciliation, recovery, and reintegration between offenders, victims, and society. In conclusion, although it has several implementation and legal issues, restorative justice can be an alternate strategy for resolving grave human rights breaches. The recommendations are for a stronger and more comprehensive legal framework to support the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia's human rights context.