Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudentie Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pedagang Kaki Lima Pada Lingkungan UPN Veteran Jakarta Kampus Pondok Labu Hanif Fil’Awalin; Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani; Bariq Raditya; Hasan Yusuf; Ali Arva Prabangkara; Adnasohn Aqilla Respati; Mulyadi Mulyadi
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v1i2.531

Abstract

Street vendors are the dominant informal economic activity in urban areas. These street vendors are a form of scale economic activity that can produce and or distribute goods and services. Goods sold on roadside and in city centres that are busy with visitors provide necessities for the lower middle class, but it is not uncommon for people from the upper middle class to buy wares from street vendors. The purpose of writing this research is to. This study uses a normative juridical method. The results showed that the street vendors in the UPN Veteran Jakarta environment had filled the sidewalks on the road in front of the UPN Veteran Jakarta campus. Which is where the road or sidewalk should be used by pedestrians so that it is difficult for pedestrians to pass through the road because the road is narrow and there are many vehicles passing by. Thus, it can be concluded that the existence of street vendors, especially those selling in the UPN Veteran Jakarta Campus Pondok Labu environment, clearly violates laws and regulations. This is because the stalls used by street vendors for selling use roads and sidewalks which can disrupt traffic order and deprive pedestrians of their rights. Apart from that, this also damages the beauty of the city's spatial planning which causes the locations where street vendors sell their goods to look shabby and dirty.
Analisis Perbandingan Standar Pembuktian Pidana Indonesia-Amerika Serikat: Studi Alat Bukti DNA sebagai Bukti Tunggal Mochammad Ferdinan Adzhani; Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 1 Juni 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i1.57059

Abstract

This study examines the legal standing of DNA evidence as a sole means of proof within the criminal justice systems of Indonesia and the United States. DNA, known for its scientific reliability and high accuracy in identifying perpetrators, has received substantial recognition in the United States. Under the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, DNA evidence in the U.S. can independently substantiate a conviction and serve as the sole basis for a guilty verdict. In contrast, Indonesia's evidentiary framework remains governed by the negatief wettelijk principle, which requires at least two valid pieces of evidence supported by the judge’s conviction to establish criminal liability. As a result, DNA evidence in Indonesia is generally considered corroborative rather than conclusive and cannot stand alone in court. This research adopts a normative juridical method, combining statutory analysis and conceptual interpretation to assess the legal treatment of DNA evidence in both jurisdictions. The findings emphasize the urgent need for Indonesia to reform its criminal procedure law to accommodate modern scientific evidence, such as DNA, as primary proof in specific cases. Recommendations include amending provisions in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), enhancing forensic infrastructure, strengthening legal regulations, and improving the capacity of law enforcement personnel. With appropriate procedural safeguards and human rights protections, DNA evidence holds significant potential to be recognized as standalone proof within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Keywords: DNA evidence, criminal evidence, Forensics
Co-Authors Adnasohn Aqilla Respati Ali Arva Prabangkara Bariq Raditya Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Hanif Fil’Awalin Hasan Yusuf Mulyadi Mulyadi