Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASIKAN HAK-HAK MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DALAM PENGUASAAN CAGAR ALAM GUNUNG MUTIS Agustinus Seo Bani; Saryono Yohanes; Rafael Rape Tupen; Kotan Y. Stefanus
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Januari 2026)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v3i1.1581

Abstract

The recognition and protection of indigenous peoples’ rights constitute a constitutional mandate as stipulated in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. However, in practice, the implementation of these rights continues to face significant challenges, particularly in conservation areas. One such area is the Mount Mutis Nature Reserve in North Central Timor Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, which has been traditionally controlled and utilized by the Mollo indigenous community. This study aims to analyze the implementation of indigenous peoples’ rights in the control of the Mount Mutis Nature Reserve and to examine the role of local government and community support in managing the area. The research employs a normative legal research method supported by an empirical approach. Data were collected through literature review of relevant laws and regulations, as well as interviews with government officials, conservation area managers, customary leaders, and local community members in Tasinifu Village, Mutis District. The findings reveal that the Mollo indigenous community maintains strong historical, spiritual, and social ties to the Mount Mutis area, as reflected in the existence of customary sites such as sacred stones (faot kanaf) and sacred water sources (oe fam). Although the rights of indigenous peoples over the area are normatively recognized, their implementation remains suboptimal due to limited administrative recognition, boundary disputes, and conservation management approaches that tend to be top-down. Government support is still partial and has not fully positioned indigenous communities as key actors in conservation area management. This study emphasizes the necessity of strengthening legal recognition of indigenous peoples and developing participatory conservation management models that prioritize indigenous involvement to ensure justice, protection of traditional rights, and environmental sustainability.
Kewenangan Menguji Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Yohanes Baptista Geroda Laga Doni Soge; Saryono Yohanes; Mario Aprio Almit Lawung; Rafael Rape Tupen
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Juli: JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8634

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation and implementation of the authority to test laws and regulations (judicial review) in the Indonesian state system based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study applies a normative juridical method using three main approaches, namely the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the historical approach. The legal data collected includes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are then reviewed through qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that normatively the division of judicial review authority between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court has been expressly regulated in Article 24A paragraph (1) and Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Supreme Court is given the authority to test regulations under the law against the law, and the Constitutional Court is given the authority to test laws against the 1945 Constitution. This division of authority is a manifestation of the principle of separation of powers and the mechanism of checks and balances after the third amendment to the 1945 Constitution. However, in practice, this two-roof judicial review system tends to give rise to conceptual and practical problems, such as overlapping authority and differences in decisions between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court which have the potential to create legal uncertainty and reduce public trust in the judicial institution. Therefore, it is necessary to reorganize the authority of judicial review by strengthening coordination between institutions or unifying the authority of judicial review which is centered on one institution only in order to guarantee legal certainty, harmonization of norms, and supremacy of the constitution in the Indonesian state system.