Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.647
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Pemuliaan Keadilan INTEGRASI : Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Verdict: Journal of Law Science Journal of Law and Nation Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law
Agus Rasyid Chandra Wijaya
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH DERET DALAM KEDUDUKAN HUKUM(STUDI KASUS DI RW 11 KELURAHAN TAMANSARI, KECAMATAN BANDUNG WETAN, KOTA BANDUNG) Muhamad Fariq Kalam; Agus Rasyid Chandra Wijaya
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Law and Nation
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research is motivated by the disagreement between the Bandung City Government and the residents of RW 11 Tamansari Village, the Indonesian Government is trying to realize a program related to the recovery of slums. This research aims to explain how the efforts of RW 11 residents to reject the process of row house construction in the rule of law and to find out the legal certainty of RW 11 Tamansari residents in the construction of row houses. The method used in this research is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques in this research are observation, interview, and documentation. The results showed that residents refused because in terms of land ownership, the land in RW 11 Tamansari Village was not a regional asset and in legal certainty in the problems of residents of RW 11 Tamansari Village there were many violations of the rules that had been set, then the Bandung City Government ignored the rules themselves based on the incompatibility of Perwal No. 665 of 2017 to the process of building this row house.
Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Fungsi DPRD Kota Sukabumi berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2018 Ita Mulyawati Dewi; Agus Rasyid Chandra Wijaya
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i3.1668

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the authority of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) of Sukabumi City based on Government Regulation Number 12 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for the Preparation of Standing Orders of Regional People's Representative Councils of Provinces, Regencies, and Cities. The authority of the DPRD is a crucial element in ensuring the effective implementation of regional governance under the principle of check and balances. This research employs a normative juridical legal research method with a descriptive-analytical specification. The approaches used include the statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The analysis is conducted using the Authority Theory of Philipus M. Hadjon, which classifies sources of authority into attribution, delegation, and mandate. The results indicate that the authority of the DPRD of Sukabumi City in exercising its supervisory function originates from constitutional attribution directly conferred by Article 20A paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, reinforced by Law Number 17 of 2014, Law Number 23 of 2014, and operationalized through Government Regulation Number 12 of 2018 Articles 19, 21, and 22. Such authority is imperative in nature, not merely discretionary. Failure to exercise it constitutes a violation of the constitutional mandate, resulting in what Hadjon refers to as a legal oversight vacuum that enables systematic and recurring legal violations.
Diskresi Penyidik dan Batas Normatif Rehabilitasi Penyalahguna Narkotika dalam Pasal 82 Huruf i Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang KUHAP Aldri Christian; Agus Rasyid Chandra Wijaya
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v3i3.1867

Abstract

The codification of Indonesian criminal procedure law through Law Number 20 of 2025 has transformed the legal framework for handling narcotics abusers. Article 82(i) excludes narcotics offenses from the restorative justice mechanism while providing an exception for narcotics users and abusers, thereby introducing a non-penal pathway that has never been regulated in previous criminal procedure codifications. This study aims to analyze the legal framework and normative limits of investigators' discretion in referring narcotics users and abusers to rehabilitation under Law Number 20 of 2025. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials consist of Law Number 20 of 2025, Law Number 1 of 2023, and Law Number 35 of 2009, supported by secondary legal materials in the form of scholarly journals and legal doctrines. The analysis is conducted prescriptively through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The findings reveal that Article 82(i) merely serves as an entry point for restorative justice eligibility rather than an independent legal basis for rehabilitation. The absence of definitions for narcotics users and abusers, the lack of linkage with Article 80, and the limitation of assessment procedures to women and vulnerable groups cause investigators' discretion to depend on scattered subordinate regulations, resulting in legal uncertainty and disparities in case handling. This study recommends the enactment of implementing regulations that establish criteria for narcotics users, an integrated assessment mechanism, and standards for supervising investigators' discretion to achieve the rehabilitative objectives of the post-codification legal framework.
Diskresi Tanpa Impunitas: Rekonstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Anggota Polri atas Tindakan Diskresioner di Tingkat Kepolisian Sektor Ali Nursiswanto; Agus Rasyid Chandra Wijaya
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v3i3.1886

Abstract

Police discretion under Article 18 of Law Number 2 of 2002 grants police officers authority to take actions based on their judgment for the public interest. At the sub-district police (Polsek) level, however, this authority is exercised in direct contact with the community while receiving relatively limited supervision, creating potential risks of abuse. This study examines the implementation of police discretion at Polsek Cidadap and identifies the legal accountability mechanisms governing discretionary actions. Using normative legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and case analyses supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through literature and document review. Legal interpretation is conducted using grammatical, systematic, teleological, and historical methods, while qualitative analysis and deductive reasoning are employed to formulate conclusions. The findings indicate that lawful discretion must comply with legality, proportionality, accountability, human rights protection, and the principles of good governance. In practice, discretion may be exercised through conflict mediation, public order maintenance, and restorative justice. Conversely, actions exceeding authority or causing harm may result in administrative, disciplinary, ethical, civil, or criminal liability, reinforced through internal and external oversight mechanisms. The study recommends mandatory written justifications, improved documentation at the Polsek level, and clearer statutory standards for public interest and proportionality to ensure discretion promotes substantive justice while preserving legal certainty and equality before the law. The research also contributes by integrating discretion and accountability within a comprehensive framework focused on the underexplored Polsek level.
Implementation of Restorative Justice in Traffic Accident Cases at Sukabumi City Police Station Haidan Angga Kusumah; Agus Rasyid Chandra Wijaya; Novita Zahra
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55849/rjl.v1i4.495

Abstract

Background.  The transportation sector is a sector that has an important role in improving the welfare of society. Therefore, the government issued the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation as a guideline for the creation of safe and comfortable transportation. Purpose. this research aims to find out how the implementation of restorative justice in handling traffic accident cases, especially at Sukabumi City Police. The method used in writing this thesis is a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. Method. This research uses a normative juridical approach. Normative juridical research is often called theoretical research because normative juridical research discusses doctrines or principles in law. Results. The triggering factors for traffic accidents based on Law No.22/2009 are road negligence and vehicle negligence itself. In addition, there are internal factors that arise from humans such as carelessness, drowsiness, etc. Based on Law No.22 of 2009, there are no other events to resolve traffic accident cases other than criminal justice. However, Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021 on Handling Crimes Based on Restorative Justice provides a way to resolve traffic accident cases with restorative justice. Conclusion. Based on the description above, it can be concluded that the concept of restorative justice is a concept that is expected to complement the shortcomings of the criminal justice system. The implementation of the concept of restorative justice in traffic accident cases in Sukabumi City has been running in accordance with Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021 Handling Crimes Based on Restorative Justice.
Co-Authors A Rijalullah Kusumah Cakra Aldri Christian Ali Nursiswanto Efendi, Rivan Dwi Haidan Angga Kusumah Ita Mulyawati Dewi Muhamad Arspira Pamungkas Fusga Muhamad Fariq Kalam Muhamad Fariq Kalam Muhamad Ripki Ardiansyah Novita Zahra Ratu Morinda Citri Reinaldy Rodiana Dachlan Reinaldy Rodiana Dachlan Safrilia, Ajeng Wahyu Aji Saputra Zahra, Novita