Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

RUU KUHAP: Tantangan dan Harmonisasi antara Asas Due Process of Law dan Criminal Justice System di Indonesia Khairuddin Hasibuan; Budi Sastra Panjaitan; Arifuddin Muda Harahap
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Juli : JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v3i2.6023

Abstract

The renewal of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) through the Draft Law (RUU) KUHAP opens up space for in-depth philosophical reflection on the relationship between law, justice, and humanity. This article examines the challenges of harmonizing the principle of due process of law, which emphasizes respect for individual rights in every legal process, with the criminal justice system, which is oriented towards efficiency and the purpose of punishment. This harmony is not only a technical and normative matter, but also a matter of shared understanding of what is meant by justice in the context of a more humane and human rights-based criminal justice system. Using a philosophical legal perspective, this article explores the potential for conflict and convergence between the two principles, and seeks common ground within the framework of Pancasila legal values ​​and Islamic law that prioritize humanity, substantive justice, and a balance between individual rights and the public interest. The renewal of the RUU KUHAP, in this context, is not merely a structural change, but a journey towards a legal system that guarantees the depth of justice, which is not only seen from a procedural perspective, but also from the moral and social essence of the law itself.
Constructive Criticism of the Role of Sharia Advocates in Legal Aid in the Contemporary Era Budi Sastra Panjaitan
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11294

Abstract

This study examines the role of sharia advocates in providing legal aid in Indonesia during the contemporary era, driven by the increasing public demand for legal settlements based on Islamic values. This phenomenon shows the existence of a collective awareness of the importance of a legal approach that is not only legal-formal, but also ethical and spiritual. However, the complexity of modern law and structural challenges, such as the absence of specific regulations on Sharia advocates and limited professional training, are serious obstacles to carrying out the role ideally. In the midst of efforts to realize substantive justice, Sharia advocates are often trapped in a conventional legal framework (customs) that is not fully compatible with the Sharia values they carry. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method, combining a juridical-normative and sociological approach, through literature studies and interviews with relevant parties. The results of the study indicate that sharia advocates hold a strategic position in sharia-based dispute resolution, particularly amid the growing demand for legal settlements that reflect Islamic justice values. To carry out this role optimally, it is necessary to strengthen the capacity of personnel (lawyers), increase professional competence, provide adequate institutional support, and integrate Sharia values with Human Rights (HAM) principles in legal aid practice. Therefore, constructive criticism of the existing system is crucial to encourage reforms in aspects of education, regulation, and sharia advocacy practices that are more relevant, inclusive, and responsive to the dynamics of the law in the contemporary era.
PERAN LEMBAGA REHABILITASI NARKOTIKA SEBAGAI PREFERENSI PEMIDANAAN BAGI PENYALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA Melin Manik; Budi Sastra Panjaitan
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2026.v14.i02.p01

Abstract

Penyalah Guna narkotika merupakan permasalahan multidimensi yang berdampak serius terhadap aspek sosial, ekonomi, dan keamanan nasional. Di Indonesia, tingginya angka Penyalah Guna narkotika mendorong perlunya pendekatan Preferensi di luar pemidanaan konvensional, khususnya melalui mekanisme rehabilitasi sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran Yayasan Keris Sakti sebagai Institusi Penerima Wajib Lapor (IPWL) dalam pelaksanaan rehabilitasi pengguna narkotika, serta mengkaji hambatan, dan solusi dalam penyelenggaraan program rehabilitasi sebagai Preferensi pemidanaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis kualitatif dengan memadukan data primer melalui observasi dan wawancara, serta data sekunder melalui studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Yayasan Keris Sakti menjalankan program rehabilitasi berbasis Therapeutic Community dan pembinaan keagamaan yang berorientasi pada pemulihan holistik fisik, mental, sosial, dan spiritual. Namun, pelaksanaan program masih terkendala oleh minimnya dukungan dari berbagai pihak, seperti residen, keluarga, pemerintah serta terbatasnya sarana dan prasarana, kondisi ekonomi residen, rendahnya motivasi intrinsik, serta disharmoni keluarga. Upaya penanganan dilakukan melalui evaluasi berkala, konseling, seminar edukasi, dialog keluarga, dan studi banding. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa peran Yayasan Keris Sakti penting dalam mendukung kebijakan rehabilitasi nasional, tetapi efektivitasnya memerlukan penguatan koordinasi antar-instansi, peningkatan fasilitas, serta dukungan sosial yang berkelanjutan. Temuan ini diharapkan dapat menjadi dasar pengembangan model rehabilitasi yang lebih manusiawi, komprehensif, dan efektif di tingkat lokal maupun nasional. Drug abuse is a multidimensional problem that has serious impacts on social, economic, and national security aspects. In Indonesia, the high rate of drug abuse encourages the need for alternative approaches beyond conventional criminalization, particularly through rehabilitation mechanisms as regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009. This study aims to analyze the role of the Keris Sakti Foundation as an Institution Receiving Mandatory Reports (IPWL) in implementing the rehabilitation of drug users, as well as examine the obstacles and solutions in implementing rehabilitation programs as an alternative to criminalization. The research method used is qualitative juridical by combining primary data through observation and interviews, and secondary data through literature studies. The results of the study indicate that the Keris Sakti Foundation runs a Therapeutic Community-based rehabilitation program and religious guidance oriented towards holistic physical, mental, social, and spiritual recovery. However, the implementation of the program is still hampered by minimal support from various parties, such as residents, families, the government as well as limited facilities and infrastructure, residents' economic conditions, low intrinsic motivation, and family disharmony. Treatment efforts are carried out through regular evaluations, counseling, educational seminars, family dialogues, and comparative studies. This study concludes that the Keris Sakti Foundation plays a crucial role in supporting national rehabilitation policies, but its effectiveness requires strengthened inter-agency coordination, improved facilities, and sustained social support. These findings are expected to form the basis for developing a more humane, comprehensive, and effective rehabilitation model at the local and national levels.