Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies
Marwinata, Pepy
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Religious Moderation and Family Resilience in the City of Malang, Indonesia: The Historical Perspectives of the Islamic Law Fadil, Fadil; Marwinata, Pepy; Jannah, Shofiatul; Siroj, A. Malthuf
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 8, No 1 (2024): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.19821

Abstract

Religious moderation is a moderate attitude or perspective in religion that is fair and balanced. A moderate mindset and behavior in the family is very significant for married couples to avoid things that can damage the honor and dignity of the family. The research method used is an empirical legal study with an approach to the history of Islamic law. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with a number of informants namely, academics, housewives, teachers and self-employed people. While document studies are carried out by analyzing journal articles, books and various references related to the discussion. The research found that a moderate religious perspective and attitude are critical for family life. Family resilience strategies include belief systems, organizational processes, communication processes, and problem solvers. Among the materials that are very important for strengthening religious moderation in the family are tolerance, leadership in the family, division of roles in the family, equal relations between a husband and a wife, respect for the existence and quality communication of all family members, and cultivating negotiation in decision-making, And no less important is a moderate religious understanding. In terms of the Islamic law history, several families, such as the Prophet Ibrahim’s family, the Imran family (Alu Imran), and the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, can be used as examples of cultivating the true values of monotheism, humanity, social solidarity, and even purity and self-respect. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, the family of Hadaratus Sheikh KH. Hasyim Asyari, the founder of Nahdlatul Ulama can be used as an example who gives birth to children and grandchildren and even families who have a sense of nationalism, religion, humanism, pluralism and social solidarity.                                   
Relation of Religious, Politics, and State in Indonesia: A Comparative Study Soekarno and Abdurrahman Wahid Mu'iz, Dzikrul Hakim Tafuzi; Nasrulloh, Nasrulloh; Marwinata, Pepy; Mahsunah, Mursyidatul
Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Syekh Abdur Rauf Aceh Singkil, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/arjis.v3i3.174

Abstract

This study aims to compare Soekarno's and Abdurrahman Wahid's (Gus Dur) thoughts regarding the form of state that is relevant in Indonesia. This concerns the relationship between religion, politics, and the state in the context of Indonesia, which is still a polemic that has not found a meeting point in various discussions, so the issue has always been a current discourse because it always experiences fluctuating discourse in the political arena in Indonesia. Soekarno and Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) are two figures who have significantly contributed to the Indonesian nation; apart from the fact that they have served as presidents, their ideas also quite color the dynamics of thinking about how to state in Indonesia. This paper examines Soekarno and Gus Dur's views on the relationship between religion and the state and then compares the two. This type of research is normative research using a conceptual approach to obtain a comprehensive framework of Soekarno and Gus Dur's thoughts. The conclusion of this research found three forms of relationship between religion and the state, namely integralistic, secularistic, and symbiotic. Soekarno, with his nationalism, emphasized the separation between religion and the state so that it tended to be a secularistic relationship. Meanwhile, Gus Dur, with his contextualist paradigm, prefers to implement Islam as a social ethic, necessitating a symbiotic relationship or mutual benefit and mutual need between religion and the state. [Studi ini bertujuan mengkomparasikan pemikiran Soekarno dan Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) terkait bentuk negara yang relevan di Indonesia. Hal tersebut mencakup relasi antara agama, politik, dan negara dalam konteks Indonesia yang masih menjadi suatu polemik yang belum menemukan titik temu dalam berbagai perbincangan sehingga topik tersebut selalu menjadi diskursus aktual karena senantiasa mengalami fluctuative discourse dalam percaturan politik di Indonesia. Soekarno dan Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) merupakan dua tokoh yang berjasa besar bagi bangsa Indonesia selain karena mereka pernah menjabat sebagai presiden, gagasan-gagasan mereka juga cukup mewarnai dinamika pemikiran cara bernegara di Indonesia. Tulisan ini mengkaji pandangan Soekarno dan Gus Dur tentang relasi antara agama dan negara kemudian mengkomparasikan keduanya. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan conceptual approach untuk mendapatkan kerangka pemikiran Soekarno dan Gus Dur secara komprehensif. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menemukan tiga bentuk hubungan antara agama dan negara, yaitu: integralistik, sekularistik, dan simbiotik. Soekarno dengan nasionalismenya lebih menekankan pemisahan antara agama dan negara sehingga lebih cenderung pada hubungan sekuralistik. Sedangkan Gus Dur dengan paradigma kontekstualisnya lebih memilih untuk mengimplementasikan Islam sebagai etika sosial, meniscayakan adanya hubungan simbiotik atau saling menguntungkan, dan saling membutuhkan antara agama dan negara].
Co-Authors A. Malthuf Siroj, A. Malthuf Fadil, Fadil Mahsunah, Mursyidatul Mu'iz, Dzikrul Hakim Tafuzi Nasrulloh Nasrulloh Shofiatul Jannah