Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory
Marwinata, Pepy
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Religious Moderation and Family Resilience in the City of Malang, Indonesia: The Historical Perspectives of the Islamic Law Fadil, Fadil; Marwinata, Pepy; Jannah, Shofiatul; Siroj, A. Malthuf
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 8, No 1 (2024): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.19821

Abstract

Religious moderation is a moderate attitude or perspective in religion that is fair and balanced. A moderate mindset and behavior in the family is very significant for married couples to avoid things that can damage the honor and dignity of the family. The research method used is an empirical legal study with an approach to the history of Islamic law. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with a number of informants namely, academics, housewives, teachers and self-employed people. While document studies are carried out by analyzing journal articles, books and various references related to the discussion. The research found that a moderate religious perspective and attitude are critical for family life. Family resilience strategies include belief systems, organizational processes, communication processes, and problem solvers. Among the materials that are very important for strengthening religious moderation in the family are tolerance, leadership in the family, division of roles in the family, equal relations between a husband and a wife, respect for the existence and quality communication of all family members, and cultivating negotiation in decision-making, And no less important is a moderate religious understanding. In terms of the Islamic law history, several families, such as the Prophet Ibrahim’s family, the Imran family (Alu Imran), and the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, can be used as examples of cultivating the true values of monotheism, humanity, social solidarity, and even purity and self-respect. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, the family of Hadaratus Sheikh KH. Hasyim Asyari, the founder of Nahdlatul Ulama can be used as an example who gives birth to children and grandchildren and even families who have a sense of nationalism, religion, humanism, pluralism and social solidarity.                                   
Relation of Religious, Politics, and State in Indonesia: A Comparative Study Soekarno and Abdurrahman Wahid Mu'iz, Dzikrul Hakim Tafuzi; Nasrulloh, Nasrulloh; Marwinata, Pepy; Mahsunah, Mursyidatul
Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Syekh Abdur Rauf Aceh Singkil, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/arjis.v3i3.174

Abstract

This study aims to compare Soekarno's and Abdurrahman Wahid's (Gus Dur) thoughts regarding the form of state that is relevant in Indonesia. This concerns the relationship between religion, politics, and the state in the context of Indonesia, which is still a polemic that has not found a meeting point in various discussions, so the issue has always been a current discourse because it always experiences fluctuating discourse in the political arena in Indonesia. Soekarno and Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) are two figures who have significantly contributed to the Indonesian nation; apart from the fact that they have served as presidents, their ideas also quite color the dynamics of thinking about how to state in Indonesia. This paper examines Soekarno and Gus Dur's views on the relationship between religion and the state and then compares the two. This type of research is normative research using a conceptual approach to obtain a comprehensive framework of Soekarno and Gus Dur's thoughts. The conclusion of this research found three forms of relationship between religion and the state, namely integralistic, secularistic, and symbiotic. Soekarno, with his nationalism, emphasized the separation between religion and the state so that it tended to be a secularistic relationship. Meanwhile, Gus Dur, with his contextualist paradigm, prefers to implement Islam as a social ethic, necessitating a symbiotic relationship or mutual benefit and mutual need between religion and the state. [Studi ini bertujuan mengkomparasikan pemikiran Soekarno dan Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) terkait bentuk negara yang relevan di Indonesia. Hal tersebut mencakup relasi antara agama, politik, dan negara dalam konteks Indonesia yang masih menjadi suatu polemik yang belum menemukan titik temu dalam berbagai perbincangan sehingga topik tersebut selalu menjadi diskursus aktual karena senantiasa mengalami fluctuative discourse dalam percaturan politik di Indonesia. Soekarno dan Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) merupakan dua tokoh yang berjasa besar bagi bangsa Indonesia selain karena mereka pernah menjabat sebagai presiden, gagasan-gagasan mereka juga cukup mewarnai dinamika pemikiran cara bernegara di Indonesia. Tulisan ini mengkaji pandangan Soekarno dan Gus Dur tentang relasi antara agama dan negara kemudian mengkomparasikan keduanya. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan conceptual approach untuk mendapatkan kerangka pemikiran Soekarno dan Gus Dur secara komprehensif. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menemukan tiga bentuk hubungan antara agama dan negara, yaitu: integralistik, sekularistik, dan simbiotik. Soekarno dengan nasionalismenya lebih menekankan pemisahan antara agama dan negara sehingga lebih cenderung pada hubungan sekuralistik. Sedangkan Gus Dur dengan paradigma kontekstualisnya lebih memilih untuk mengimplementasikan Islam sebagai etika sosial, meniscayakan adanya hubungan simbiotik atau saling menguntungkan, dan saling membutuhkan antara agama dan negara].
Nikah Beda Agama dan Implementasinya di Indonesia Marwinata, Pepy; Hakim, Muhammad Nur Rizal
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v3i4.1669

Abstract

The phenomenon of interfaith marriage in Indonesia remains a complex debate between religious law, state law, and human rights. Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage stipulates that a marriage is valid if it is conducted according to the laws of each religion and belief, implying that interfaith marriage has no clear legal basis in Indonesia. However, in reality, interfaith marriages continue to occur in various ways, either through the conversion of one of the parties or through registration abroad. This article aims to analyze the legal regulations on interfaith marriage in Indonesia, their implementation in the field, and the tension between religious values, national law, and freedom of religion. This study uses a normative juridical approach by examining legislation, court decisions, and Islamic legal views. The results of the study show that the prohibition of interfaith marriage is based on theological and normative reasons, but in practice there is still room for compromise, which shows disharmony between religious law and state law. Therefore, a more humanistic and equitable legal approach is needed without neglecting the principles of sharia and public morality.
Analisis Intervensi Psikososial Perkawinan Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Malang Marwinata, Pepy; Hakim, Muhammad Nur Rizal
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v3i4.1671

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the psychosocial psychology of child marriages which are victims of sexual violence. The approach in this research uses a qualitative descriptive method using interviews, observation and documentation as data collection techniques. This approach aims to obtain descriptive text or verbal form from sources directly in the field. In terms of psychosocial theory, it is a term used to describe the relationship between a person's social condition and their mental or emotional health. For example, the relationship between the fear a person has (psychological) and how he interacts with other people in his social environment. A person who has a healthy mentality will react in a positive way in various situations. In contrast to people who have mental instability, they will react negatively to everything that happens in life. The results of research conducted by researchers related to the psychosocial conditions of the impact of child marriage in Malang Regency are difficulty in adjusting, the range of experiencing household disputes, resolving problems with divorce, poor social relations, ways to educate children who are not yet competent and economic problems, then we can provide a solution to this problem through psychosocial intervention in the form of personal, group, familial and play therapy which will have a positive impact in the form of cognitive, emotional, behavioral and social environmental changes.
Law Enforcement Against Illegal Orphanage Managers in Sexual Violence Against Foster Children Bulan Cahya, Rut Erika; Marwinata, Pepy
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v15i1.33008

Abstract

Illegal orphanages operating without permits often pose environmental risks that are vulnerable to various forms of abuse, including sexual violence against the children they are supposed to protect. This study examines the legal enforcement against illegal orphanage managers in Gubeng, Surabaya, who are suspected of being involved in sexual violence against foster children and child abduction, as well as regulations related to the establishment of social institutions. Using a normative legal approach and qualitative analysis methods, data was obtained through legal literature studies, court decisions, and case reports in the Surabaya area. The results of the study show that law enforcement efforts are still hampered by weak supervision, a lack of synergy between agencies such as the Ministry of Social Affairs, the Police, and the Social Services Agency, as well as legal loopholes that allow illegal orphanages to operate without adequate control. Obstacles in coordination also affect the process of proving cases, so that even though the Child Protection Law has established severe sanctions, its implementation in the field is often not optimal. These findings emphasize the need to strengthen the monitoring system, improve inter-agency cooperation, and strengthen commitment to law enforcement to prevent similar cases from recurring.
Co-Authors A. Malthuf Siroj, A. Malthuf Bulan Cahya, Rut Erika Fadil Mas’ud Hakim, Muhammad Nur Rizal Mahsunah, Mursyidatul Mu'iz, Dzikrul Hakim Tafuzi Nasrulloh Nasrulloh Shofiatul Jannah