Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Contradictions in The Implementation of The Death Crime in Indonesia: Fiqhi Jinayah's Perspective And Legal Renewal Policy National Crime Marlina, Andi; Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang; Donny Eddy Sam Karauwan
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 21 No 2 (2023): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v21i2.7143

Abstract

This study aims to scrutinize the contradictions inherent in the application of the death penalty from two distinct perspectives: the perspective of Islamic criminal law (jinayah) and the ongoing reforms in Indonesian criminal law. In Islamic criminal law, the purpose of the death penalty lies in safeguarding religion, the soul, the mind, lineage, and property. The study utilizes a qualitative approach to analyze legal sources and relevant literature, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the contentious nature of the death penalty in Indonesia. The findings highlight the ongoing complexity and controversy surrounding the death penalty in Indonesia, encompassing various legal, ethical, and human rights perspectives. The text underscores the multifaceted nature of the debate, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of international standards, societal norms, and legal frameworks in shaping policies related to capital punishment. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on human rights, legal reform, and the ethical considerations surrounding the death penalty..
Reformulate Supervisory Mechanism of The Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission, Why and How? Ahmad Sahroni; Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v12i3.1558

Abstract

Supervision of the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission needs to be reformed. This is to prevent the KPK from abusing its authority in the process of eradicating corruption. In addition, reforms also need to be carried out to increase accountability, ensure transparency, build public trust, and prevent internal corruption. Specifically, improvements to the KPK's supervision method in this study will focus on efforts to improve the filling of the KPK Supervisory Board position. The research method using Normative Juridical Legal Research, with a Conceptual Approach and a Statute Approach. The results of the study show that the KPK supervision carried out by the KPK Supervisory Board shows less than optimal results. This claim is due to the filling of the KPK Supervisory Board position which only comes from the President. There is no Checks and Balances mechanism in filling the Supervisory Board position. The author recommends that the DPR can take and increase its role in filling the KPK Supervisory Board position. In addition, there are several other reformulations of improvements. Including the implementation of reports and complaints with a reverse proof system, as well as building an information system for alleged ethical violations.
Co-Authors Ahmad Sahroni Donny Eddy Sam Karauwan Marlina, Andi