Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Nur al-Nafis fi Takhrij ahadis kitab Durr al-Nafis li al-Syaikh Muhammad Nafis al-Banjari Asbiani, Abdurrahim
ISLAM NUSANTARA:Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Islam Nusantara Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Islam Nusantara University of Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (UNUSIA) Jakarta.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/islamnusantara.v4i2.708

Abstract

Syekh Muhammad Nafis bin Idris bin Husain al-Banjari, seperti mayoritas ulama MelayuIndonesia yang bermazhab Syafi’i dan Asy’ari. Lahir pada tahun 1148 H atau bertepatan 1735 M.Ia memiliki beberapa karangan diantaranya ialah kitab “al-Durru al-Nafis fi Bayan Wahidah al-Af’al wa al-Asma wa al-Shifat wa al-Dzatu al-Taqdis”, yang membahas tentang ilmu tashawuf.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap hadis-hadis yang terdapat dalam kitab al-Durru al-Nafis. kemudian mendatangkan hukum hadis tersebut dan takhrij-nya supaya orang umum danpenuntut ilmu mengetahui apakah hadis-hadis tersebut dapat dijadikan hujjah atau tidak. Adapunmanhaj (metode) yang digunakan ialah metode Imam al-Iraqi dalam kitabnya al-Mughni al-Asfar‘an Haml al-Asfar dalam menentukan hokum hadis-hadis yang terdapat dalam kitab Ihya Ulum al-Din. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat 31 hadis tanpa pengulangan yang diteliti dalam kitab tersebut.Kebanyakan hadisnya tidak sahih, yaitu 42% sahih, 19% dhaif dan 39% hadis peneliti tidakmemberikan komentar (hukum). Peneliti berprasangka bahwa Muallif mengambil hadis dikitabnya dengan orientasi ini karena ia bukan ulama hadis, melainkan ulama tasawuf.
(النَّقْدُ عَلَى دَلِيْلِ إِقَامَةِ الخِلَافَةِ لِحِزْبِ التَّحْرِيْرِ إِنْدُوْنِيْسِيَا: تَحْلِيلُ الأَحَادِيْثِ فِي تَفْسِيْرِ الْقُرْآنِ الْعَظِيْمِ لِإِبْنِ أَبِيْ حَاتِمٍ (ت. 327 هـ Asbiani, Abdurrahim; Muhammad Azizan Fitriana; Syamsul Ariyadi
ISLAM NUSANTARA:Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Islam Nusantara Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Islam Nusantara University of Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (UNUSIA) Jakarta.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article discusses about criticism of the argument for establishing a caliphate for Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) with analysis of hadith in the interpretation of bi ar-riwāyah. The Khilafah aims to enforce Islamic law. There are several groups or mass organizations that are trying to implement the caliphate. One group in Indonesia is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. They are of the opinion that any state system cannot be accepted or even called infidel if it is not based on the Koran and Hadith. There is a lot of research on the caliphate, such as discussing the caliphate historically, or referring to classical and contemporary tafsir books. Likewise with the discussion of takhrīj, quite a few studies discuss takhrīj or hadith analysis. In this study, researchers analyzed the hadiths in the tafsir bi ar-riwāyah or more precisely Tafsīr Al-Qur`Ān Al-‘Aẓīm by Ibn Abī Ḥātim. This research is limited to verses that are understood as arguments for upholding the concept of the caliphate, namely QS. Āli ‘Imrān [3]: 110, QS. al-Mā`idah [5]: 44 and QS. al-Mā`idah [5]: 48. This research is “Library Research” using qualitative methods. The approach used is the takhrīj hadith approach. In the analysis of takhrīj hadith, the author starts by bringing in hadith from other sources if there are other sources. Then the writer examines the narrators of the sanad (criticism of sanad) and explains the meaning of the hadith (syarh hadith) along with the law (quality) of the sanad. From this research, we can find out the source and quality of the hadiths as well as explanations of these hadiths, so that there is no mistake in understanding the hadith text. After research, there were several narrations (sanad) that were invalid because there were problematic narrators. Of the 8 historical texts, 5 of them have the quality of sanad daīf and the remaining 3 are ḥasan. Of the various words of the caliphate in the Koran, there is no word that discusses and requires the caliphate. Key words: Khilafah, Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, Tafsir Ibn Abī Ḥātim.
Nur al-Nafis fi Takhrij ahadis kitab Durr al-Nafis li al-Syaikh Muhammad Nafis al-Banjari Asbiani, Abdurrahim
Islam Nusantara: Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Islam Nusantara Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Islam Nusantara, Nahdlatul Ulama University of Indonesia (Unusia) Jakarta.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/islamnusantara.v4i2.708

Abstract

Syekh Muhammad Nafis bin Idris bin Husain al-Banjari, seperti mayoritas ulama MelayuIndonesia yang bermazhab Syafi’i dan Asy’ari. Lahir pada tahun 1148 H atau bertepatan 1735 M.Ia memiliki beberapa karangan diantaranya ialah kitab “al-Durru al-Nafis fi Bayan Wahidah al-Af’al wa al-Asma wa al-Shifat wa al-Dzatu al-Taqdis”, yang membahas tentang ilmu tashawuf.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap hadis-hadis yang terdapat dalam kitab al-Durru al-Nafis. kemudian mendatangkan hukum hadis tersebut dan takhrij-nya supaya orang umum danpenuntut ilmu mengetahui apakah hadis-hadis tersebut dapat dijadikan hujjah atau tidak. Adapunmanhaj (metode) yang digunakan ialah metode Imam al-Iraqi dalam kitabnya al-Mughni al-Asfar‘an Haml al-Asfar dalam menentukan hokum hadis-hadis yang terdapat dalam kitab Ihya Ulum al-Din. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat 31 hadis tanpa pengulangan yang diteliti dalam kitab tersebut.Kebanyakan hadisnya tidak sahih, yaitu 42% sahih, 19% dhaif dan 39% hadis peneliti tidakmemberikan komentar (hukum). Peneliti berprasangka bahwa Muallif mengambil hadis dikitabnya dengan orientasi ini karena ia bukan ulama hadis, melainkan ulama tasawuf.
An-Naqdu ‘alā Dalīli Iqāmati al-Khilāfah li-Ḥizbi at-Taḥrīr Indūnīsiyā: Taḥlīlu al-Aḥādīṡ fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm li-Ibni Abī Ḥātim (w. 327 H) Muhammad Azizan Fitriana; Syamsul Ariyadi; Asbiani, Abdurrahim
Islam Nusantara: Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Islam Nusantara: Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Islam Nusantara, Nahdlatul Ulama University of Indonesia (Unusia) Jakarta.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/islamnusantara.v4i2.1488

Abstract

This article presents a critical examination of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia's (HTI) argument for establishing a caliphate by analyzing relevant hadiths within the framework of tafsīr bi ar-riwāyah, specifically from Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm by Ibn Abī Ḥātim. HTI advocates for a political system based solely on the Qur’an and Hadith, rejecting other state systems as un-Islamic or even infidel. While previous studies on the caliphate often focus on historical perspectives or classical and contemporary tafsir literature, this study narrows its focus to the takhrīj (hadith authentication) of narrations used to support caliphate claims. The research employs a qualitative library-based method, utilizing a hadith takhrīj approach. It investigates three key verses commonly cited in caliphate discourse: QS. Āli ʿImrān [3]:110, QS. al-Māʾidah [5]:44, and QS. al-Māʾidah [5]:48. Hadiths linked to these verses are traced, their chains of transmission (sanad) examined, and their meanings (syarḥ) interpreted. Each narration’s authenticity is evaluated through sanad criticism, highlighting the reliability or weakness of the narrators. The findings reveal that out of eight hadiths analyzed, five are classified as ḍaʿīf (weak) and three as ḥasan (acceptable). Some narrations were deemed invalid due to problematic transmitters. Importantly, while the Qur’an mentions concepts such as khilāfah or khalīfah, none of the cited verses explicitly command the establishment of a caliphate as proposed by HTI. The study thus urges caution in employing weak or misinterpreted hadiths as foundational arguments for political ideologies.