Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Suara Hukum The Prosecutor Law Review
Basuki, Fernando
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Proyeksi Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Merespon Asset Recovery Bagi Korban Penipuan Investasi: Projection of Asset Forfeiture Draft Law in Response to Asset Recovery for Victims of Investment Crime Oktobrian, Dwiki; Basuki, Fernando; Lumempow, Euodia Syefela
The Prosecutor Law Review Vol 2 No 2 (2024): The Prosecutor Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum, Kejaksaan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64843/prolev.v2i2.44

Abstract

Maraknya kasus penipuan investasi di Indonesia menimbulkan pertanyaan substantif tentang apakah mereka yang menjadi korban berhak mendapatkan asset recovery. Tulisan ini hendak mengungkap bagaimana keterjangkauan regulasi Indonesia memfasilitasi hal asset recovery dan bagaimana proyeksi Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset melihat asset recovery bagi korban penipuan investasi. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian normatif dengan memfokuskan pada Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset, berbagai putusan pengadilan yang telah menguji asset recovery sebagai hak korban kejahatan investasi, dan telaah literatur dalam topik yang sama. Artikel ini mengungkap bahwa  regulasi tidak menjangkau asset recovery, dan keterbatasan ini juga dialami Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset sebagai regulasi yang diproyeksikan berlaku di masa depan. Rancangan ini membatasi pada upaya negara untuk memiskinkan koruptor melalui kemudahan perampasan aset, tanpa mempertimbangkan bahwa pencucian uang tidak selalu berasal dari korupsi, tapi juga penipuan investasi.
Redesigning the Provision of Aggravation in Property Crime during the Pandemic Oktobrian, Dwiki; Basworo, Handityo; Amalia, Syarafina; Basuki, Fernando; Lumempow, Euodia; Jain, Vaibhav
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v6n2.p206-227

Abstract

One of the things that has been potentially overlooked in the development of criminal law during the Covid-19 pandemic is how the Prosecutor's Office and the Courts view the seriousness of property crimes. Every state has set up a social safety net to ensure that individuals are able to live without hunger despite the economic slowdown, and this initiative also comes along with a more intense social concern from the social environment. This article seeks to uncover the patterns of prosecution and imprisonment by judges for property crimes during the pandemic, which are inappropriate as everyone experiences family loss and economic hardship. The primary data in this article uses interviews with prosecutors and judges, then validates it in data on the length of prison charges and prison sentences recorded in the Case Tracking Information System (SIPP) in the Semarang District Court, Banyumas District Court, and Purwokerto District Court. The results of this research reveal two important things. First, prosecutors and judges in Indonesia during the Covid-19 pandemic did not aggravate prison charges and prison sanctions, even the Penitentiary tended to accelerate the assimilation process or shorten the duration of imprisonment. Second, property crimes committed during the pandemic are relevant to aggravate the threats and penalties, because they make life difficult for people who are financially and psychologically weak. Indonesia should consider revising the sentencing guidelines in the National Criminal Code before it becomes effective in 2026.
Co-Authors Amalia, Syarafina Basworo, Handityo Dwiki Oktobrian Jain, Vaibhav Lumempow, Euodia Lumempow, Euodia Syefela