Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Milthree Law Journal
Ardilafiza
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Kepala Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara Sebagai Pengelola Keuangan Negara Berdasarkan Kekuasaan Presiden Menurut Konsepsi Keuangan Negara Rusmana, Rizki Tri; Ardilafiza; Illahi, Beni Kurnia
Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei Vol 22 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jkutei.v22i2.31292

Abstract

The head of the Nusantara's authority has been granted the power to manage the finances of the Nusantara's Capital by the President, even though it is not explicitly stated in the State Finances Act. This has led to confusion about the nature of the financial management authority referenced in the Nusantara's Capital Law. This study aims to examine the institutional characteristics of the Nusantara's Capital Authority and the position of its Head as a manager of state finances, based on the President's power according to the concept of state finance. Using a normative law approach with a statute and conceptual approach, the research found that the Nusantara's Capital Authority has been established based on national law, with its headquarters in the national capital and directly responsible to the President, without a Regional House of Representatives and not led by a governor. Given these characteristics, it is more appropriate to categorize the Nusantara's Capital Authority as a Central Government. In terms of managing state finances in the Nusantara's Capital, the Head of the Authority is in the position of a minister/head of an institution as referred to in paragraph (2) letter b, serving as the Budget User/Goods User for Nusantara's Capital.
Special Chamber Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu Firnandes Maurisya; Sukamto Satoto; Ardilafiza
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v1i3.56

Abstract

Penyelesaian sengketa pemilu merupakan salah satu aspek krusial dalam menjaga integritas proses demokrasi di Indonesia. Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) sebagai lembaga yang berwenang menangani sengketa hasil pemilu sering menghadapi lonjakan jumlah perkara, terutama pada setiap pemilu legislatif dan pemilu kepala daerah. Beban perkara yang tinggi ini berpotensi mempengaruhi efektivitas dan efisiensi dalam memberikan putusan yang adil dan tepat waktu. Untuk mengatasi tantangan tersebut, konsep Special Chamber diusulkan sebagai solusi guna mempercepat proses penyelesaian sengketa pemilu tanpa mengurangi kualitas putusan yang dihasilkan oleh MK. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan serta analisis putusan MK yang berkaitan dengan penyelesaian sengketa pemilu. Data yang digunakan bersumber dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang relevan dengan topik penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembentukan Special Chamber dapat menjadi alternatif dalam menangani sengketa pemilu secara lebih efektif dengan tetap menjaga prinsip independensi dan keadilan konstitusional. Namun, implementasi gagasan ini memerlukan perubahan dalam regulasi serta struktur kelembagaan MK agar tetap selaras dengan prinsip negara hukum dan demokrasi yang dianut di Indonesia.
Position Of The Supreme Court Decision Number 23 P/HUM/2024 After The Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024 Oktafiani Zendrato; Ardilafiza
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 34 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.34.1.40-65

Abstract

Supreme Court Decision Number 23 P/HUM/2024 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024 are two decisions related to the age requirements for regional head candidates which were initially followed up by the House of Representatives and ultimately the House of Representatives chose to follow Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU XXII/2024. The purpose of this research is to find out how the authority of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in testing laws and regulations related to the Regional Elections and what is the position of the Supreme Court Decision Number 23 P/HUM/2024 after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 70/PUU-XXII/2024. This research method is a normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the authority of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in testing statutory regulations related to regional head elections has different scopes of authority. The Supreme Court has limited authority to test statutory regulations under the law against the law, one of which is the General Election Commission Regulation as a derivative regulation of the Regional Head Election Law and does not have the authority to test the Regional Head Election Law, while the Constitutional Court has the authority to test laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia,  one of which is in testing the Regional Head Election Law. Meanwhile, Supreme Court Decision Number 23 P/HUM/2024 regarding the testing of age requirements for regional head candidates has a lower position when it is used as a basis for the formation of laws and regulations and when used as jurisprudence. Therefore, as a practical contribution, the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court should strengthen their understanding of the limits of authority possessed in testing laws and regulations. Although the authority of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court is different, coordination between these two institutions is still necessary to create consistency in the application of the law. Therefore, there needs to be a more intensive dialogue between these institutions related to intersecting issues, such as testing laws and regulations related to the Regional Elections.
Co-Authors Firnandes Maurisya Illahi, Beni Kurnia Oktafiani Zendrato Rusmana, Rizki Tri Sukamto Satoto