Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research (IJSMR) Focus Journal Law Review Milthree Law Journal
Sukamto Satoto
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Special Chamber Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu Firnandes Maurisya; Sukamto Satoto; Ardilafiza
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v1i3.56

Abstract

Penyelesaian sengketa pemilu merupakan salah satu aspek krusial dalam menjaga integritas proses demokrasi di Indonesia. Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) sebagai lembaga yang berwenang menangani sengketa hasil pemilu sering menghadapi lonjakan jumlah perkara, terutama pada setiap pemilu legislatif dan pemilu kepala daerah. Beban perkara yang tinggi ini berpotensi mempengaruhi efektivitas dan efisiensi dalam memberikan putusan yang adil dan tepat waktu. Untuk mengatasi tantangan tersebut, konsep Special Chamber diusulkan sebagai solusi guna mempercepat proses penyelesaian sengketa pemilu tanpa mengurangi kualitas putusan yang dihasilkan oleh MK. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan serta analisis putusan MK yang berkaitan dengan penyelesaian sengketa pemilu. Data yang digunakan bersumber dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang relevan dengan topik penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembentukan Special Chamber dapat menjadi alternatif dalam menangani sengketa pemilu secara lebih efektif dengan tetap menjaga prinsip independensi dan keadilan konstitusional. Namun, implementasi gagasan ini memerlukan perubahan dalam regulasi serta struktur kelembagaan MK agar tetap selaras dengan prinsip negara hukum dan demokrasi yang dianut di Indonesia.
The Honorary Board of Election Organizers (DKPP) as an Ethical Judicial Institution for Election Organizers Wein Arifin; A. Zarkasi; Sukamto Satoto
Focus Journal : Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2024): Focus Journal Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2
Publisher : Universitas Bali Dwipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62795/fjl.v4i2.274

Abstract

The Honorary Board of Election Organizers (DKPP) is an election organizing body tasked with handling violations of the code of ethics of election organizers. DKPP is a state institution established by law. As a state institution that organizes elections, DKPP has the authority to examine, call, sanction and decide on violations of the code of ethics of election organizers. This authority is implemented through a judicial process such as in general courts, namely the process of examining reporting witnesses, reported witnesses, expert statements, validation of evidence, and reading of the verdict. The DKPP's decision is final and materially binding. The trial of violations of the code of ethics held by the DKPP and added to having the nature of a final and binding decision makes the DKPP in several judicial body decisions referred to as a quasi public court, while in the Constitutional Court decision the DKPP is interpreted as a single function of organizing the Election together with the KPU and Bawaslu, meaning that the DKPP is an election organizing institution.Based on this, this study formulates the problem formulation, namely how is the position and authority of the DKPP as a state institution that organizes elections that functions as a quasi public court? This research is a normative legal research whose nature is descriptive and from the perspective of its form is a prescriptive research. This research uses a legislative, conceptual, historical, conceptual, and comparative approach. The research results conclude that the DKPP is an election organizer in the form of an auxiliary state organ that is independent. The DKPP has the authority to enforce the code of ethics of election organizers which in character is almost the same as a general court. The DKPP's decision is final and materially binding. Based on this, the DKPP as a state institution that organizes elections can be called quasi ethical court of  public nature.
Determination of Age of Majority In Liability Juvenile Crime in Indonesian Criminal Law Umar Dinata; Sukamto Satoto; Usman; Erdianto
International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 1 No. 11 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ijsmr.v1i11.7038

Abstract

In juvenile criminal cases, the age limit of children is of great importance, since this obligation to determine whether a suspect belongs to the category of children or not is related to the criminal liability of children. In discussing the extent to which a person can meaningfully be prosecuted as a child, it appears that many laws are inconsistent in their boundaries because they are motivated by the goals of each law. itself. In order to examine the purpose of this study, the purpose of this study is to examine the regulations for determining the age of consent for criminal responsibility of children in the current Indonesian criminal law. This research method uses normative legal research methods, a legal approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach and a case approach. The results of this study show that from the minimum age at which children can become important as adults, any legal act of a legal entity can become possible once they reach this legal capacity of adulthood. Aspects of legal protection in determining the age of consent in Indonesian criminal law are related to the criminal liability of children. The measure of a species' ability to assume responsibility can be derived from several factors, ranging from the age to the psychology of the perpetrator. After examining the facts, one can come to the conclusion that the age limit for adulthood, which is pluralism, may lead to ambiguity in determining when a person is declared of adulthood and held responsible for the crimes committed by him becomes
Co-Authors A. Zarkasi Ardilafiza Dinata, Umar Erdianto Firnandes Maurisya Usman Wein Arifin