Isnadi, Yuli
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Disaster Policy, Participation, and Horizontal Conflict: Case Study Reconstruction Aid Funds of The Bantul Earthquake: Case Study Reconstruction Aid Funds of The Bantul Earthquake Isnadi, Yuli; Asmarawati Handoyo
Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), June
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jap.v13i1.9117

Abstract

This investigation aims to show that the government’s policy without participation approach causes horizontal conflict in society. The case study is financial aid in reconstruction process for the earthquake’s victims in Bantul Regency, 2006-2007. This research collects secondary data, such as government’s documents, journals, books, news, and other relevant sources. Based on data analysis, we find that the absence of participation in policy making causes policy cannot accommodate the social context of the target group. As impact, community leaders and community members face a problematics situation that creates many problems during implementation. These problems, finally, lead the society into horizontal conflict. This finding might contribute in public policy and disaster management discourse, theoretical and practical, and build a path for the future research.
Trends and Thematic Evolution in Digital Policy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Fridayani, Helen Dian; Younus, Muhammad; Isnadi, Yuli; Nurmandi, Achmad; Widyasari, Sindy
Journal Public Policy Vol 11, No 4 (2025): October
Publisher : Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jpp.v11i4.11506

Abstract

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of digital policy research, evaluating its thematic evolution and theoretical underpinnings across international journals. Utilizing the Scopus search engine, the research identifies and classifies digital policy publications from 2013 to 2023, and VOSviewer software was employed to visualize trends, network linkages, and information production. The findings indicate a notable lack of theory-driven research in the digital policy domain, with a majority of studies focusing on empirical or applied aspects rather than foundational theory. This gap is particularly pronounced in areas like cybersecurity, data privacy, and digital governance. Additionally, the study reveals that interdisciplinary journals contribute more to theory-based digital policy research than specialized publications. The research calls for greater integration of theoretical frameworks in digital policy studies to address global digital challenges better. It highlights the need for scholars to explicitly link their work to theory, thus enriching policy development and offering more comprehensive solutions to emerging technological issues. Failure to incorporate theory consistently represents a missed opportunity to influence the broader discourse on digital governance and policy making.
Asymmetric Decentralization and the Rise of Monitorial Citizens: Institutional Opportunity Structures in Indonesia's Special Autonomy Regions Cicellia, Celly; Widaningrum, Ambar; Isnadi, Yuli
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.v13i2.30171

Abstract

Monitorial citizenship is a model of citizenship widely regarded as more realistic, yet the literature on it remains dominated by Western countries, thereby neglecting the specific contexts of developing nations. This study analyzes the potential for the development of the “monitorial citizen” by linking it to the context of asymmetric decentralization in Indonesia. Using a qualitative multiple-case study approach with an embedded method across four asymmetric regions (Papua, Aceh, Yogyakarta, and Jakarta), this study fully utilizes secondary data comprising regional democracy indices, the performance achievements of Regional People’s Representative Councils, and relevant regulations. The study’s findings indicated that asymmetric decentralization does not automatically influence the potential for the development of “monitorial citizens.” Variations in institutional configurations across the four case studies confirm this. Four aspects influence the development of citizen monitoring: the quality of regional democracy, the capacity of representative institutions, the availability of complementary participation channels, and the interaction between existing institutions and the public. This study also provides recommendations that emphasize institutional aspects in discourses on citizen monitoring and asymmetric decentralization.