Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Clarosa, Vivian
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Challenges in the Implementation of Judges' Professional Ethics and Conflicts of Interest that Affect Integrity Bimo, Anthonio; Lie, Cathleen; Clarosa, Vivian; Christian, Juttah; Bryan, Hanz; Saly, Jeane Neltje
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.821

Abstract

The judicial profession is a profession that has a very important role in carrying out the law enforcement process. To enforce the law, a judge is required to make a decision that will be the settlement of a case that occurs. In its implementation, the judge upholds the code of ethics that is owned to carry out a fair and correct judicial power. The implementation of professional ethics as a judge is certainly faced with many challenges. Not a few members of the judges are unsteady in upholding the code of ethics that should be followed. Integrity is needed so that there is no violation of the code of ethics.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Yang Mengalami Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning; Clarosa, Vivian; Lie, Cathleen; Retaly, Andrea Tamaranova; Armando, Very
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 9 No 22 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10152917

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the law protects workers affected by layoffs unilaterally. Termination of employment (PHK) unilaterally should not be carried out because only one party benefits and the other party feels disadvantaged. Therefore, there are problems that result in the end of the rights and obligations of workers and employers regulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. It doesn't work, sometimes there are disputes. This usually happens because there is no common understanding between workers/employees and employers. Termination of employment can be resolved bilaterally, conciliation, arbitration and industry-related courts.Basically Termination of Employment (PHK) unilaterally is a decision made by a company without going through a legal process or the establishment of an Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Institution. There is also disagreement about the legal basis for Termination of Employment (PHK) in which a company can terminate unilaterally for 2 (two) reasons, namely, the first is due to dismissal for the same reason in the worker/employee and the second is dismissal for the same reason in company. The research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach accompanied by primary and secondary legal materials
The Legitimacy Controversy Surrounding Mass Organizations as Holders of Mining Business Licenses within the Framework of National Mining Law Clarosa, Vivian; Rasji, Rasji
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.382

Abstract

This study analyzes the legitimacy of religious-based organizations (ormas) as holders of mining business permits under Law Number 2 of 2025, the Fourth Amendment to Law Number 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining. Using a normative juridical approach, it evaluates the policy’s alignment with the constitutional principles of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and the framework of good mining governance. The findings indicate that prioritizing Special Mining Business Permit Areas (WIUPK) for business entities owned by religious organizations is formally recognized but substantively fragile. The policy creates risks of political clientelism, conflicts of interest, and environmental harm due to insufficient technical capacity and weak oversight. Normatively, it does not fulfill the constitutional mandate to promote public welfare but instead opens pathways for abuses of authority and the politicization of religion. Strengthening implementing regulations is essential to ensure transparency, accountability, and environmental sustainability in natural resource management.
Co-Authors Armando, Very Bimo, Anthonio Bryan, Hanz Christian, Juttah Jeane Neltje Saly Lie, Cathleen Rasji, Rasji Retaly, Andrea Tamaranova Tundjung Herning Sitabuana