Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Engagement Law (Supreme Court Decision Number 951 K/Pdt/2015) Setiawan, Ferdiansyah Prawira Negara; Mantiri, Juttah Christian
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.832

Abstract

An agreement or contract is a legal relationship between two or more people who promise to give rise to legal consequences by means of an agreement. Legal consequences in the form of mutual rights and obligations between the parties. As a rule, an agreement or contract begins with a conflict or disagreement of interests between the parties, and the formation of a contractual relationship usually begins with a process of negotiation between the parties. This research method uses descriptive analysis. It is a method of using collected data to describe or provide an overview of the research subject and to present generally accepted conclusions. Based on the case in the Supreme Court decision No. 951 K/Pdt/2015 if Defendant I issues a statement that the "assets" a quo are no longer burdened with Mortgage Rights and then recommends to the Co-Defendant to Royalize the Plaintiff's "assets" a quo; the submission of Co-Defendant as a party in cassu solely to comply with the contents of the decision by ordering the Land Office of Makassar City to Roya the "asset" of the Plaintiff a quo and issue a Duplicate of HGB Certificate Number 477/Baru if the original certificate is lost by Defendant I. However, based on the opinion of the Defendant this is wrong and not right. Based on the legal facts found in the decision, the cassation petition from the Cassation Petitioners was rejected and the Cassation Petitioners were on the losing side, so the Cassation Petitioners were sentenced to pay court fees at this cassation level of Rp. 500,000.
Kepastian Hukum dalam Administrasi Perizinan Pertambangan Pasca Putusan MK No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 Mantiri, Juttah Christian; Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 8, No 4 (2025): Oktober, Social Issues and Problems in Society
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v8i4.51270

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023 memberikan dampak signifikan terhadap kerangka hukum administrasi perizinan pertambangan di Indonesia, terutama terkait kepastian hukum dan kedudukan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (KTUN). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi putusan tersebut terhadap legalitas KTUN yang diterbitkan pemerintah dalam proses perizinan pertambangan, serta mengevaluasi sejauh mana perubahan norma dan praktik administrasi pasca putusan mampu menjamin prinsip kepastian hukum bagi pelaku usaha dan penyelenggara pemerintahan. Melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis terhadap putusan MK, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan doktrin hukum administrasi, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa putusan MK memunculkan reinterpretasi penting terhadap kewenangan administratif yang sebelumnya membuka ruang multitafsir. Koreksi konstitusional ini menuntut harmonisasi regulasi, penguatan prosedur administratif, serta penyesuaian sistem digital seperti Minerba One Data Indonesia (MODI) agar KTUN yang diterbitkan tetap memiliki dasar hukum yang sah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepastian hukum baru dapat terwujud apabila respons pemerintah berjalan cepat, komprehensif, dan konsisten, terutama dalam memastikan keselarasan antara norma substantif, prosedural, dan implementasi teknis. Tanpa langkah tersebut, perubahan yang ditimbulkan putusan MK justru berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum baru. Oleh karena itu, penguatan tata kelola administrasi dan sistem perizinan berbasis digital menjadi langkah strategis untuk menjamin stabilitas hukum di sektor pertambangan.