Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Land Ownership Rights for Indonesian Citizens of Chinese Descent in the Province of the Special Region of Yogyakarta Syailendra Putra, Moody Rizqy; Joeliant, Hanz Bryan; Raditya, Anthonio Bimo
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.835

Abstract

All Indonesian citizens have the right to own land in Indonesia according to the BAL and the 1945 Constitution. However, in the DIY Province, Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent are prohibited from owning land rights as regulated in the Instruction of the Head of the Special Region of Yogyakarta Number K.898/I/A/1975. This research discusses the legal provisions governing land ownership rights for Indonesian citizens of Chinese descent in the Province of DIY. The research method is normative with secondary data through primary and secondary legal materials. The approach used is statutory and historical with a prescriptive analysis using deductive logic. Based on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which is discussed further in the UUPA, all Indonesian citizens can obtain property rights. There are historical factors contained so that the privilege law is enacted. This regulation was made to prevent exploitation of land in DIY and for the welfare of the people at that time.
Issuer Compliance with Disclosure Principles in Insider Trading in the Indonesian Capital Market: A Comparative Study with Singapore and the United States from an Investor Protection Perspective: Kepatuhan Emiten Terhadap Prinsip Disclosure dalam Insider Trading di Pasar Modal Indonesia Perbandingan dengan Singapura dan Amerika Serikat: Perspektif Perlindungan Investor Joeliant, Hanz Bryan; Gunadi, Ariawan
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1095

Abstract

General Background: Insider trading and weak information disclosure undermine market integrity and investor protection. Specific Background: In Indonesia, disclosure obligations under the Capital Market Law, OJK regulations, and IDX rules remain limited in timeliness, insider categorization, and enforcement compared to Singapore and the United States. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies have not systematically compared issuer compliance with disclosure principles across these jurisdictions to assess their effectiveness in preventing insider trading. Aims: This study analyzes Indonesia’s disclosure framework, compares it with Singapore and the U.S., and evaluates necessary reforms to enhance investor protection. Results: Findings show Indonesia’s two-day disclosure window, narrow insider definition, and predominantly administrative sanctions weaken deterrence, while Singapore’s immediate disclosure model and the U.S.’s broad misappropriation theory, real-time surveillance, and strong enforcement provide higher compliance and detection levels. Novelty: This research integrates doctrinal, conceptual, and comparative analyses to demonstrate how adopting broader insider definitions, accelerated disclosure, and technology-driven monitoring can strengthen Indonesia’s regulatory structure. Implications: Strengthening OJK–IDX integration, enhancing surveillance capacity, reforming insider trading provisions, and adopting international best practices are essential to improving market transparency and long-term investor confidence. Highlights: Indonesia’s disclosure rules remain slower and less comprehensive than Singapore and the U.S. Broader insider definitions and real-time surveillance improve detection and deterrence. Strengthened OJK–IDX integration is essential for effective enforcement and investor protection. Keywords: Insider Trading, Disclosure, Investor Protection, Capital Market Regulation, Comparative Study