Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Journal Innovation In Education
Alex Prayoga Sidabutar
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Dampak Nilai Tugas Rendah terhadap Prestasi Akademik Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran PPKn di SMP Negeri 35 Percut Sei Tuan Alex Prayoga Sidabutar; Daniel David Sidebang; Dorlince Oktavia Hutapea; Dwi Valentina Sihite; Jihan Aisyah Ramadhania; Nur Arba Asari; Abdi Nur Batu Bara
Journal Innovation In Education Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Journal Innovation in Education (INOVED)
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/inoved.v2i2.1189

Abstract

The subject of Pancasila and Citizenship Education is one of the subjects that must be studied at all levels from elementary school to university. In studying Pancasila and citizenship education, students must be able to understand what they are learning in order to become wise and good citizens. Based on research conducted by the author, there are several obstacles that cause low student learning outcomes at SMP Negeri 35 Percut Sei Tuan. Namely the readiness and maturity of students, their learning motivation, the learning media they use, and the learning methods used by their teachers.
Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan Ulfa Fatimah; Alex Prayoga Sidabutar; Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania; Dorlince O Hutapea; Parlaungan G Siahaan; Dewi Pika Lbn Batu
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7068

Abstract

The crime of receiving stolen goods, as regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), is an offence that plays a crucial role in the continuation of the principal crime, particularly theft. Receivers provide a market for stolen goods, thereby indirectly encouraging perpetrators to continue their actions. This article aims to analyse the implementation of Article 480 of the KUHP in judicial practice, with a focus on proving the element of ‘knowing or reasonably suspecting’ that the goods purchased were obtained through criminal activity. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach through direct observation of a trial at the M. District Court. The observations show that the panel of judges successfully proved the defendant's guilt as a fence through a series of trial facts, such as the unreasonable purchase price, consistent testimony from the perpetrator of the theft, and the defendant's own admission that he had been suspicious. The judge's decision, which was lighter than the prosecutor's demands, also reflected considerations of substantive justice and humanity in addition to legal certainty. This study concludes that the effective enforcement of Article 480 of the Criminal Code in court plays an important role in breaking the chain of crime and providing a deterrent effect not only for the main perpetrators but also for those who participate in enjoying the proceeds of crime.
Implementasi Pasal 480 KUHP terhadap Peran Pembeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Sebuah Tinjauan dari Praktik Persidangan Ulfa Fatimah; Alex Prayoga Sidabutar; Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania; Dorlince O Hutapea; Parlaungan G Siahaan; Dewi Pika Lbn Batu
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.7073

Abstract

The crime of receiving stolen goods, as regulated in Article 480 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), is an offence that plays a crucial role in the continuation of the principal crime, particularly theft. Receivers provide a market for stolen goods, thereby indirectly encouraging perpetrators to continue their actions. This paper investigates how Article 480 of the KUHP in judicial practice, with a focus on proving the element of ‘knowing or reasonably suspecting’ that the goods purchased were obtained through criminal activity. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach through direct observation of a trial at the M. District Court. The observations show that the panel of judges successfully proved the defendant's guilt as a fence through a series of trial facts, such as the unreasonable purchase price, consistent testimony from the perpetrator of the theft, and the defendant's own admission that he had been suspicious. The judge's decision, which was lighter than the prosecutor's demands, also reflected considerations of substantive justice and humanity in addition to legal certainty. This study concludes that the effective enforcement of Article 480 of the Criminal Code in court plays an important role in breaking the chain of crime and providing a deterrent effect not only for the main perpetrators but also for those who participate in enjoying the proceeds of crime.  
Co-Authors Abdi Nur Batu Bara Daniel David Sidebang Dewi Pika Lbn Batu Dorlince O Hutapea Dorlince Oktavia Hutapea Dwi Valentina Sihite Isnaniah Isnaniah Jihan Aisyah Ramadhania Jihan Aisyah Ramahdania Lammarito Lumban Gaol Maulana Ibrahim Nur Arba Asari Parlaungan G Siahaan Ramsul Nababan Taslima Ameliya Taufik Tifany Laura Balqis Ulfa Fatimah