Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DALAM KELUARGA Dewi, Asrah; Santing, Waspada; Zubaidah, Siti
Clavia Vol. 21 No. 3 (2023): Clavia : Journal of Law, Desember 2023
Publisher : Faculty Of Law Bosowa University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56326/clavia.v21i3.4007

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Faktor penyebab terjadinya pencurian dalam keluarga dan mengetahui penerapan Pasal 367 KUHP dalam perkara (Putusan Nomor 844/Pid.B/2022/PN Mks). Penelitian ini menggunakan tipe penelitian normatif empiris, jenis data yang digunakan  yaitu data primer dan data sekunder, data primer diperoleh langsung melalui informasi dengan menggunakan teknik wawancara oleh Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Makassar, Polsek Tamalate Makassar, Advokat BPH PERADI Makassar, Dosen Fakultas Psikolog Universitas Bosowa dan majelis taklim khairunas. Sedangkan data sekunder diperoleh dari penelitian kepustakan dengan memperlajari buku-buku, perundang-undangan, putusan-putusan dan jurnal yang berhubungan dengan muatan skirpsi ini. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1)Faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya pencurian dalam keluarga  pada Putusan No.844/Pid.B/2022/Pn Mks bahwa ada 4 faktor yaitu: (a).Niat atau kesengajaan, (b). Kesenangan pribadi, (c). Keadaan ekonomi, (d).Lingkungan pergaulan, (2) Penerapan Pasal 367 KUHP dalam Putusan No. 844/Pid.B/2022/Pn Mks. Tindak pidana pencurian dalam keluarga yang dilakukan oleh terdakwa  (adik kandung) terhadap korban (kakak kandung) yang terbukti bersalah mencuri barang milik korban, dalam hal ini diterapkan atas delik aduan yakni dengan melihat terpenuhinya semua unsur-unsur dalam pasal 367 KUHP, oleh karena itu, hakim menjatuhkan terhadap terdakwa pidana penjara selama 9 (sembilan) bulan Research aims to determine the factors causing theft in the family and to find out the application of Article 367 of the Criminal Code in the case (Decision Number 844/Pid.B/2022/PN Mks). This study uses empirical normative research types, the types of data used are primary data and secondary data, primary data is obtained directly through information using interview techniques by Makassar District Court Judges, Makassar Tamalate Police Station, BPH PERADI Makassar Advocates, Lecturers of the Faculty of Psychologists, Bosowa University and the taklim khairunas assembly. While secondary data is obtained from literature research by studying books, legislation, rulings and journals related to this literary content. The results of this study show that: (1) The factors causing theft in the family in Decision No.844/Pid.B/2022/Pn Mks that there are 4 factors, namely: (a). Intent or intentionality, (b). Personal pleasure, (c). The state of the economy, (d). Social environment, (2) Application of Article 367 of the Criminal Code in Decision No. 844/Pid.B/2022/Pn Mks. The criminal act of theft in the family committed by the accused (younger sibling) against the victim (sibling) who is found guilty of stealing the victim's property, in this case is applied to the offense of the complaint, namely by looking at the fulfillment of all elements in article 367 of the Criminal Code, therefore, The judge sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for 9 (nine) months.
ANALISIS HUKUM PENJUALAN HARTA GONO-GINI TANPA PERSETUJUAN ISTRI (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN No.1684/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Mks): LEGAL ANALYSIS OF GONO-GINI PROPERTY SALES WITHOUT WIFE AGREEMENT (CASE STUDY DECISION No.1684 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PA.Mks) Arbillah, Asriani; Santing, Waspada; Taba, Hamzah
Clavia Vol. 19 No. 1 (2021): Clavia : Journal of Law, April 2021
Publisher : Faculty Of Law Bosowa University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.489 KB) | DOI: 10.56326/clavia.v19i1.631

Abstract

This research was conducted at the Class 1A Makassar Religious Court, with the aim of finding out what underlies the husband selling his property without the wife's consent and knowing the judge's consideration so as to grant the wife's lawsuit in decision No.1684 / Pdt.G / 2019 / PA.Mks. This research is a normative legal research with a focus on empirical juridical studies. The results of this study indicate that the husband sold the gono-gini property without the wife's consent, because the joint assets or property generated during the marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant have been deemed to be divided between each party. However, the panel of judges did not agree with the agreement they made because it was unclear which one belonged to the plaintiff and which one belonged to the defendant so that the assets were determined based on the facts in court, namely the testimony of the witnesses. This became the judge's consideration in deciding case Number 1684 / Pdt G / 2019 / PA.Mks, granted part of the Plaintiff's claim because the panel had examined the letter of agreement made by the Plaintiff and Defendant, but the peace agreement letter was not clear in detail or in full regarding the assets of the Plaintiff and Defendant, which where the joint assets that are part of the Plaintiff and which are part of the Defendant, so that the panel assesses what the defendant argues that the shared assets between the Plaintiff and the Defendant have been divided is not proven but has not been divided between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, so that the panel of judges agrees that The Plaintiff's claim in this case is the Defendant's Wife.
ANALISIS YURIDIS IMPLEMENTASI MUDHARABAH PADA BANK SYARIAH DI KOTA MAKASSAR : JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF MUDHARABAH IMPLEMENTATION IN SHARIA BANK IN MAKASSAR CITY Elnizar, Muh. Reza; A. Hasan, Yulia; Santing, Waspada
Clavia Vol. 19 No. 3 (2021): Clavia : Journal of Law, Desember 2021
Publisher : Faculty Of Law Bosowa University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56326/clavia.v19i3.1282

Abstract

This study aims to find out the implementation of Akad Mudharabah and to find out what factor’s influence Mudharabah in Sharia Banks in Makassar City. This research was conducted in BPRS Dana Moneter, BNI Syariah and BTN Syariah using empirical law research type, the approach is carried out by studying the actual law through interviews and fact-based documentation. The results showed that the implementation of the Mudharabah agreement at Sharia Banks in Makassar City showed that the implementation of the Mudharabah agreement in the Monetary Fund BPRS, BNI Syariah and BTN Syariah is still completely un implemented due to the many opinions of the Customer such as the absence of an agreement at the beginning by both parties, the determination of the Ratio determined by the Bank itself and other matters. As well as the factors that influence the implementation of Mudharabah, namely NPF (bank health), FDR (Financing ratio), inflation (price increase) and BOPO (Oprasional Burden on Oprasional Income) all of these factors are in keeping with the bank's performance in implementing the Mudharabah agreement. therefore, each agency is expected to increase product recognition activities and maintain its bank operations.
ANALISIS PENEGAKAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN DAERAH SULAWESI BARAT Amir, Firman; Renggong, Ruslan; Santing, Waspada
Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, Juni 2025
Publisher : Postgraduate Bosowa University Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/ijlf.v7i2.6090

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penegakan sanksi pidana terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika di wilayah hukum Kepolisian Daerah (Polda) Sulawesi Barat dan menganalisis faktor penyebab terjadinya penyalahgunaan narkotika di wilayah hukum Kepolisian Daerah (Polda) Sulawesi Barat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Kota Mamuju lingkup wilayah hukum Kepolisian Daerah (Polda) Sulawesi Barat. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa penegakan sanksi pidana terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika berdasarkan penyelidikan dan putusan pengadilan. Penyelidikan tindak pidana narkotika di wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Daerah (Polda) Sulawesi Barat yaitu dengan proses menerima laporan, melakukan tindakan pertama, penangkapan, penggeledahan, penyitaan, pemeriksaan tersangka dan saksi, penahanan serta melakukan pelimpahan berkas perkara kepada Kejaksaan. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Sulawesi Barat dalam memutusakan pidana penjara terkait narkotika selama 7 (tujuh) tahun dan didenda Rp 1 (satu) miliar apabila denda tidak dibayar maka diganti dengan hukuman pidana penjara selama 1 (satu) bulan sudah efektif untuk memberikan efek jera terhadap pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika. Faktor penyebab terjadinya penyalahgunaan narkotika disebabkan oleh beberapa faktor yaitu: Pertama, Faktor geografis, Provinsi Sulawesi Barat merupakan wilayah strategis dan pusat perdagangan sehingga memiliki beberapa jalur akses yang tidak memiliki pemeriksaan narkotika, Kedua, Faktor budaya masyarakat, tidak menutup kemungkinan masih banyak masyarakat yang tidak peduli ketika melihat pelaku penyalahgunaan narkotika di lingkungan sekitarnya. Ketiga, Faktor ekonomi, tekanan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan ekonomi dapat menyebabkan stres, yang dapat memicu penyalahgunaan narkotika. This study aims to analyze the enforcement of criminal sanctions against drug abuse in the jurisdiction of the West Sulawesi Regional Police (Polda) and analyze the factors causing drug abuse in the jurisdiction of the West Sulawesi Regional Police (Polda). The research method used is the normative legal research method. This research was conducted in Mamuju City within the jurisdiction of the West Sulawesi Regional Police (Polda). The results of the study indicate that the enforcement of criminal sanctions against drug abuse is based on investigations and court decisions. Investigation of drug crimes in the jurisdiction of the West Sulawesi Regional Police (Polda) is through the process of receiving reports, taking first action, arrests, searches, confiscations, examining suspects and witnesses, detention and transferring case files to the Prosecutor's Office. The decision of the West Sulawesi High Court in deciding on a prison sentence related to narcotics for 7 (seven) years and a fine of Rp. 1 (one) billion if the fine is not paid then it is replaced with a prison sentence of 1 (one) month has been effective in providing a deterrent effect on perpetrators of drug abuse. The factors causing drug abuse are caused by several factors, namely: First, Geographical factors, West Sulawesi Province is a strategic area and trade center so that it has several access routes that do not have drug checks, Second, Community cultural factors, it is possible that there are still many people who do not care when they see drug abusers in their surroundings. Third, Economic factors, pressure to meet economic needs can cause stress, which can trigger drug abuse.
ANALISIS HUKUM PERCERAIAN AKIBAT KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA MAKASSAR KELAS IA Mukhti, Alifyan Nur; Hasan, Yulia A; Santing, Waspada
Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, Juni 2026
Publisher : Postgraduate Bosowa University Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35965/ijlf.v8i2.9092

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek hukum perceraian yang disebabkan oleh kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas IA, khususnya terkait perlindungan hukum terhadap korban serta efektivitas upaya pencegahan perceraian akibat KDRT. Permasalahan KDRT tidak hanya menimbulkan dampak fisik dan psikis bagi korban, tetapi juga menjadi salah satu faktor dominan yang menyebabkan disharmonisasi rumah tangga hingga berujung pada perceraian. Dalam perspektif hukum, KDRT merupakan pelanggaran terhadap hak asasi manusia dan bertentangan dengan tujuan perkawinan sebagaimana diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan analisis terhadap penerapan hukum dalam penyelesaian perkara perceraian yang dilatarbelakangi oleh KDRT di lingkungan peradilan agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris. Pendekatan normatif dilakukan melalui pengkajian peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, serta putusan pengadilan yang berkaitan dengan perceraian dan KDRT. Sementara itu, pendekatan empiris dilakukan melalui wawancara dengan pihak terkait di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas IA guna memperoleh gambaran mengenai penerapan hukum dalam praktik peradilan. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk menghasilkan kesimpulan yang komprehensif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap korban KDRT dalam perkara perceraian pada dasarnya telah memiliki landasan hukum yang memadai, baik melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga maupun ketentuan hukum perkawinan dan peradilan agama. Dalam praktiknya, hakim telah berupaya memberikan perlindungan melalui proses pemeriksaan perkara, mediasi, serta pertimbangan hukum yang memperhatikan kondisi korban. Namun demikian, efektivitas upaya pencegahan perceraian akibat KDRT masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan, antara lain faktor budaya, ketergantungan ekonomi, rendahnya kesadaran hukum, dan sulitnya pembuktian kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan sinergi antara aparat penegak hukum, lembaga peradilan, dan masyarakat dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum serta mencegah terjadinya KDRT yang berujung pada perceraian. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of divorce caused by domestic violence (DV) in the Makassar Class IA Religious Court, specifically regarding legal protection for victims and the effectiveness of divorce prevention efforts due to DV. The problem of DV not only causes physical and psychological impacts for victims, but also becomes one of the dominant factors causing household disharmony that leads to divorce. From a legal perspective, DV is a violation of human rights and contradicts the objectives of marriage as regulated by laws and regulations. Therefore, an analysis is needed on the application of law in resolving divorce cases motivated by DV in the religious court environment. This study uses normative and empirical legal research methods. The normative approach is carried out through a review of laws and regulations, legal literature, and court decisions related to divorce and DV. Meanwhile, the empirical approach is carried out through interviews with relevant parties in the Makassar Class IA Religious Court to obtain an overview of the application of law in judicial practice. The data obtained are analyzed qualitatively to produce comprehensive conclusions. The research findings indicate that legal protection for victims of domestic violence in divorce cases is fundamentally well-established, both through Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence and provisions in marriage law and religious courts. In practice, judges have attempted to provide protection through case examinations, mediation, and legal considerations that take into account the victim's circumstances. However, the effectiveness of efforts to prevent divorce due to domestic violence still faces various obstacles, including cultural factors, economic dependence, low legal awareness, and the difficulty of proving domestic violence. Therefore, strengthening synergy between law enforcement officials, judicial institutions, and the community is necessary to provide legal protection and prevent domestic violence that leads to divorce.