Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Comparison of the Criteria for the Validity of Hadith in the View of the Khawarij and Sunni Muhid, Muhid; Syabrowi, Syabrowi; Nurita, Andris
Turast: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol 11, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/turast.v11i2.5982

Abstract

This article tries to identify the ideas of the Khawarij and Sunni in the criteria for the validity of hadith. So far, hawarij is known as a group in which there are people who left the ranks of 'Ali ibn Abu Talib after the tahkim (arbitration) incident.dTheir understanding of religion tends to be textual both in interpreting verses or understanding the Prophet's hadith. In its development, they helped formulate the criteria for the validity of the hadith as the Sunnis. Through this study the author tries to analyze how the differences and similarities in the concept of authenticity of hadith according to the Khawarij and Sunnis. In addition to aiming to enrich scientific treasures in the field of hadith science, this study also aims to explore further whether the concept coined by the Khawarij in measuring the validity of the hadith contains controversy or not when compared to the concept of the Sunnis. This methode of research is a qualitative research that is descriptive analysis. Sources of data in the form of previous studies or references in the form of books and books which contain related discussions. This study shows that in general the criteria for the validity of hadith according to the Khawarij are the same as the criteria for the validity of hadith according to the Sunnis.. They are also inconsistent in accepting the hadith.
Farid Esack's Hermeneutics in the Study of Women's Freedom and Justice Ichwayudi, Budi; Azzahro, Sofi; Syabrowi, Syabrowi; Ali, Maulana Ahmad
Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024): Desember (2024)
Publisher : STAI Serdang Lubuk Pakam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51672/alfikru.v18i2.473

Abstract

Problems in interpreting the concept of the Qur'an have become a significant issue in the discourse of Islamic thought in the modern era. One of the figures who paid great attention to efforts to explore the meaning of the Qur'an is Farid Esack, who used hermeneutic studies as a tool of interpretation. In line with that, this study aims to analyze the study of liberation and justice for women using Farid Esack's hermeneutic thinking. This research uses a qualitative research method with Farid Esack's hermeneutic approach. The results show that the hermeneutics initiated by Farid Esack, namely liberation hermeneutics, uses critical reasoning that places revelation, reality, and interpretation in an interacting relationship. This approach aims to produce interpretations that are oriented towards liberation and justice. The application of Farid Esack's hermeneutics can be seen in his interpretation of women's liberation from oppression and injustice, especially in the context of divorce. One example is the introduction of the concept of iddah as mentioned in the Qur'an surah Al-Baqarah verse 228 and the relevant hadith. Esack explains that a wife is still entitled to receive maintenance from her husband during the iddah period. This concept can be used as a basis for analyzing current conditions through an Islamic hermeneutic approach.
Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Perspektif Hadis: Kontekstualisasi Pemahaman Perspektif Syuhudi Ismail dan Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi Ichwayudi, Budi; Faiz, Ahmad; Al-Hamdany, Lyna Syahnuriyah; Abror, Ghulam Ahmad; Syabrowi, Syabrowi
KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah): Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): Februari
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Dakwah Institut Al Fithrah Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36781/kaca.v15i1.819

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas kontekstualisasi hadis dalam pengelolaan sumber daya air, khususnya dalam menghadapi krisis air yang diperparah oleh perubahan iklim. Dengan pendekatan hermeneutika, penelitian ini menggali hadis-hadis terkait dalam kerangka maqasid syariah, yaitu tujuan utama syariat Islam yang menekankan pentingnya keberlanjutan, efisiensi, dan keadilan dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam. Hadis-hadis tentang larangan mencemari sumber air, membuang-buang air, dan menjaga kebersihan lingkungan mengandung pesan moral yang relevan untuk diterapkan di era modern. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa ajaran Islam mengenai pengelolaan sumber daya tidak hanya bersifat universal, tetapi juga adaptif terhadap perkembangan zaman. Prinsip ini menjadi landasan etis dalam menghadapi tantangan global, seperti pencemaran air, eksploitasi berlebihan, dan ketimpangan akses air bersih. Studi ini memberikan panduan praktis bagi masyarakat Muslim untuk menerapkan nilai-nilai Islam dalam menjaga kelestarian lingkungan dan keseimbangan ekosistem, sekaligus memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat secara adil dan berkelanjutan.
Reinterpreting Democracy and Pluralism: Nurcholish Madjid’s Intellectual Legacy and Its Relevance for Contemporary Indonesia Ichwayudi, Budi; Purwanti, Nuril Atfiani; Saputra, Moh. Iqbal Firdaus; Syabrowi, Syabrowi
Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): January-June
Publisher : Program Studi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jpi.v5i1.30582

Abstract

This article examines the contemporary relevance of Nurcholish Madjid’s thought on democracy and pluralism in Indonesia. Through a qualitative literature review guided by Miles and Huberman’s analytical framework, the study synthesizes Madjid’s intellectual formation, core democratic principles, and his nuanced approach to the relationship between Islam and the state. The findings highlight Madjid’s persistent insistence that democracy is not a finished project but an ongoing, adaptive process—one that demands ethical substance, critical participation, and continuous negotiation between religious values and civic institutions. By comparing Madjid’s ideas to those of prominent Muslim thinkers such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Abdullahi An-Na’im, Khaled Abou El Fadl, and Asef Bayat, the article situates his contribution within both Indonesian and broader Islamic discourses. Madjid’s advocacy for substantive democracy and active pluralism is shown to be deeply rooted in both his personal experience and his reading of Indonesia’s diverse society. The analysis demonstrates that, in the face of growing populism, the instrumentalization of religious identity, and persistent challenges to civil rights, Madjid’s vision remains urgently relevant. Rather than offering a static blueprint, Madjid’s legacy is framed as a provocation to rethink and revitalize democracy as an open, unfinished process. His call for loyal opposition, civil courage, and social learning is presented as both a challenge and a guide for Indonesia’s ongoing democratic experiment. The article concludes that Madjid’s ideas offer not easy answers, but a critical lens and a moral discipline for navigating the dilemmas of democracy, pluralism, and national identity in Indonesia today.