Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Analisis Asas Legalitas dalam Kewenangan Presiden Menunda Eksekusi Hukuman Mati Terpidana Mary Jane Veloso Fiddin, Mohamad Fahmi; Karli, Karli
FOCUS Vol 4 No 2 (2023): FOCUS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/fcs.v4i2.1334

Abstract

Clemency is very important for the government of a country because it can reduce the risks arising from a judge's decision, especially for maximum punishment such as death penalty, which allows the execution of innocent people. Problems arise when a death row convict asks for clemency and the President rejects it. However, when the executions were to be carried out, the President issued an order to postpone the executions, causing legal uncertainty regarding the denial of clemency. As a result, law enforcement on narcotics crimes becomes ineffective. This happened when the execution of Mary Jane Veloso was postponed. In this study, delaying the implementation of decisions that have permanent legal force through clemency is not a legal remedy, but it is the right of the Head of State to grant pardons to citizens who have been sentenced by a court. Apart from that, there is a legality principle in the presidential policy in delaying the execution of convict Mary Jane Veloso which has been regulated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 1 of 2006 concerning Mutual Assistance. In Criminal Matters and Law Number 15 of 2008 concerning Ratification of the Treaty On Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (Agreement on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters). Setting the provisions of the law is an effort to realize the principle of checks and balances, so that the use of this authority has been limited, that is, before the President decides to grant a postponement of the execution of the death penalty, the President must first obtain consideration from the Supreme Court.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PEREMPUAN SEBAGAI KORBAN PELECEHAN SEKSUAL DI MEDIA MASSA Oktora, Eka; Karli, Karli
Jurnal Ilmiah Publika Vol 11 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Publika
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/publika.v11i1.8207

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi, media dan komputer yang semakin luas tanpa batasan-batasannya memberikan dampak positif namun juga dampak negatif, dimana salah satu dampak negatif dalam penyalahgunannya menimbulkan bentuk kejahatan yang sangat merugikan dan meresahkan masyarakat yakni munculnya pelecehan seksual terhadap perempuan yang kian meluas. Tidak hanya meliputi dunia nyata (kontak fisik) saja, namun juga terdapat dalam media massa dimana pelecehan seksual di media massa ini masuk dalam kategori tindakan asusila dan juga dalam bentuk kejahatan seksual terhadap perempuan, karena pelecehan seksual di media massa merupakan suatu sikap penyerangan terhadap fisik dan integritas mental psikologis seseorang. Dalam tatanan wilayah sistem peradilan pidana keadaan tersebut tidak dibarengi dengan peraturan perundang undangan yang cukup kuat untuk menanganinya. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa dalam KUHP Buku II Bab XVI dari pasal 281 sampai dengan 303 bis Tentang kejahatan terhadap kessusilaan dan Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2008 tentang Pornografi, Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi Transaksi dan Elektronik. Sedangkan upaya perlindungan hukum bagi korban merujuk pada Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban terkendala adanya kekosongan hukum dalam memberikan sebuah perlindungan hukum bagi perempuan, dimana faktanya masih banyak kekurangan dalam upaya penegakan hukumnya. Kurangnya keperceyaan terhadap penegak hukum yang menjadikan salah satu kendalanya dan psikologis dari korban sendiri yang kurang untuk mengungkapkan bahwa dirinya telah menjadi seorang korban. Terakhir persoalan yang paling mencolok pada upaya perlindungan hukum bagi korban mimiliki problem tersendiri dengan didadasari kurangnya kesadaran hukum, sedikit lemahnya peraturan dan dari sisi korbannya sendiri.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Oleh Karyawan Melalui Transaksi Fiktif Dana Operasional Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 21/Pid.B/2025/PN Ptk) Simanungkalit, Dohma Pungu Nathanael; Karli, Karli
HUMANIORUM Vol 3 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Humaniorum
Publisher : PT Elaborium Elevasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/hmr.v3i3.128

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal classification of the criminal offense of embezzlement committed in an official capacity and carried out continuously, as well as the application of criminal law in judicial practice, using Case Decision Number 21/Pid.B/2025/PN Ptk as a reference point. In this case, the defendant, who served as a financial staff member at CV Setia Andhika Sejahtera, was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of systematically embezzling company operational funds through fabricated transactions from May to August 2023. The defendant submitted false financial requests and diverted the approved funds into a personal bank account without the company's knowledge, resulting in a financial loss of IDR 476,600,000.00. This research adopts a normative legal approach, grounded in statutory and conceptual analysis, and utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The court concluded that the defendant’s actions fulfilled all elements of Article 374 of the Indonesian Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1), which governs repeated embezzlement by individuals in positions of trust. Consequently, the panel of judges sentenced the defendant to two years and three months of imprisonment. The legal reasoning and outcome in this case reflect the principles of legal certainty and justice for both the victim and the perpetrator.
Medicolegal Handling Strategy For Sexual Violence Against Women at Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital Semarang Dian Novitasari; Karli, Karli; Jamiatur Robekha
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia (JIM-ID) Vol. 4 No. 06 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisplin Indonesia (JIM-ID), July 2025
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sexual violence against women in Indonesia is an important issue that must be raised to be handled properly. In 2024, Komnas Perempuan recorded 445,502 cases of complaints of violence against women in Indonesia. Various factors behind it. However, this problem is still not of public attention until now. It even tends to be isolated so that it does not become public consumption. The majority of victims of gender-based violence are women and children. Women are vulnerable to violence because they are weak and powerless, as a result of unfair and equal gender relations. Men tend to be dominant in gender relations. This phenomenon can be seen in various data both in the media and social institutions that have concerns about handling this case. The qualitative study consisted of a normative approach, field observation and in-depth discussion (focus group discussion) to find out how the medicolegal strategy for handling sexual violence against women at the Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital in Semarang. The need for comprehensive, impartial and effective medicolegal handling needs to be applied in handling cases of sexual violence against women.
Konsekuensi Hukum bagi Pejabat Negara yang Terbukti Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Listiana, Cici Ayu; Karli, Karli
Decisio: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2024): DECISIO
Publisher : LPPM Iblam School of Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/decisio.v1i2.19

Abstract

Tindak pidana pencucian uang (TPPU) is a severe crime that threatens the stability of Indonesia’s economic and legal system. The involvement of state officials in TPPU not only undermines public trust but also weakens the integrity of governmental institutions. This study analyzes the legal consequences for state officials proven to be involved in money laundering within Indonesia’s criminal law framework. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of sanctions and legal enforcement mechanisms applicable to corrupt officials. This study employs a qualitative approach with a normative legal method, focusing on regulatory analysis and the interpretation of legal norms in practice. Data collection relies on literature studies involving primary legal sources such as laws, regulations, and court decisions, complemented by secondary sources like legal books and academic journals. The findings indicate that state officials convicted of TPPU face severe criminal penalties, including imprisonment, fines, dismissal from office, and future restrictions from holding public positions. However, legal enforcement faces significant challenges, including political intervention, sophisticated money laundering methods, and resource limitations. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, improving inter-agency coordination, and enhancing public transparency are crucial steps in addressing this issue. This study underscores the need for multi-sectoral efforts to ensure effective law enforcement and restore public confidence in governance
Efektivitas Restorative Justice sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Anak dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Rahmadani, Mahfud; Karli, Karli
Decisio: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2025): DECISIO
Publisher : LPPM Iblam School of Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/decisio.v2i1.20

Abstract

Restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach in resolving juvenile criminal cases, emphasizing reconciliation rather than punitive measures. In Indonesia, the implementation of restorative justice is legally supported through Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which mandates diversion as a primary mechanism. However, despite its progressive framework, various challenges hinder the effective application of restorative justice in practice. These obstacles include inconsistencies in law enforcement, limited institutional support, and societal resistance to non-punitive legal resolutions. This study employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, focusing on regulatory analysis and the interpretation of legal norms in current practices. Data were collected through comprehensive literature reviews, classifying legal materials into primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The findings indicate that restorative justice, particularly through diversion, provides a more humane resolution for juvenile offenders, reducing stigmatization and enhancing rehabilitation efforts. However, disparities in law enforcement practices, lack of adequate facilities, and varying levels of community acceptance have impeded its full implementation. Strengthening legal frameworks, increasing capacity-building programs for law enforcement, and enhancing public awareness are essential for the optimal application of restorative justice in Indonesia. Effective collaboration between legal institutions and community-based organizations is crucial in ensuring a fair and rehabilitative justice system for juvenile offenders.