Gagarin Akbar, Muhamad Gary
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

THE JURIDICAL REVIEW OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGE IS LINKED TO LAW NUMBER 1 OF 1974 CONCERNING MARRIAGE AS AMENDED BY LAW NUMBER 16 OF 2019 CONCERNING MARRIAGE Adinda Silvia Febrianty; Gagarin Akbar, Muhamad Gary; Abas, Muhamad
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i1.6526

Abstract

Indonesia is known for its diverse cultural customs that have been embedded from their previous ancestors and different religions and beliefs. Of course, each has different rules. Similar to marriage, the variety of religions and streams of belief in Indonesia does not rule out the possibility of interfaith marriage. Interfaith marriages are marriages performed by people of different religions or different beliefs. The issues raised in this study are how the validity of interfaith marriage according to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage has been amended by Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage and how the judge's consideration in granting requests for different religions in the study of decision number 916 / Pdt.P / 2022 / PN. Sby. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of interfaith marriage according to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and to find out the judge's consideration in granting an interfaith marriage request in the study of decision Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby. This research is a type of qualitative research that uses a normative juridical approach method, namely the approach of research by researching and reviewing the object of research through literature study. The author's conclusion to the decision is that there is an imbalance or inconsistency with Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, that in article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that marriage is valid, if it is carried out according to the laws of each religion and belief.
THE DISPARITY IN JUDGES' DECISIONS ON THE CRIME OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IS REVIEWED FROM LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2014 CONCERNING AMENDMENTS TO LAW NO. 23 OF 2002 CONCERNING CHILD PROTECTION (Study of Decision Number 858/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Bjm and Number Rengganis, Mutiara; Gagarin Akbar, Muhamad Gary; Arafat, Zarisnov
Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Justisi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36805/jjih.v9i2.8003

Abstract

Sexual violence against children is a serious violation of human rights and moral norms. This study focuses on the disparity in sentencing in two cases of sexual violence against children involving the biological father as the perpetrator, namely decision Number 858/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Bjm and Number 137/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Grt. Both are included in the category of familial abuse, where violence occurs in the family environment. Although both cases involve violations of Article 81 paragraph (3) of the Child Protection Law with a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, there are differences in sentencing. In the first verdict, the perpetrator was sentenced to 18 years in prison and chemical castration for 2 years, while in the second verdict, the perpetrator was sentenced to 20 years in prison without chemical castration. This disparity is caused by differences in juridical and non-juridical considerations by judges, although both aim to achieve legal certainty and the prevention of future crimes.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Anak Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Anak Rifky Alfarez, Dewa; Gagarin Akbar, Muhamad Gary; Abas, Muhamad
Jurnal Supremasi Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/supremasi.v15i1.3646

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan penyalahgunaan narkoba dan perlindungan hukum bagi anak yang menjadi korban penyalahgunaan narkotika dalam perspektif hukum perlindungan anak. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penyebab penyalahgunaan narkoba serta mengevaluasi efektivitas implementasi Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA) dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak (UUPA) dalam memberikan perlindungan yang memadai melalui rehabilitasi medis dan sosial. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kajian literatur dan analisis yuridis normatif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan terkait serta studi kasus implementasi di berbagai wilayah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor penyalahgunaan narkoba meliputi faktor pribadi, kekeluargaan, lingkungan, dan pendidikan. Meskipun kerangka hukum yang ada sudah kuat, implementasinya masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan seperti interpretasi yang tidak konsisten dan pelaksanaan yang bervariasi. Rehabilitasi medis dan sosial terbukti penting dalam memulihkan kesehatan dan fungsi sosial anak. Untuk meningkatkan efektivitas perlindungan hukum, diperlukan upaya konsistensi dalam penerapan regulasi, penguatan program rehabilitasi, serta peningkatan edukasi dan kampanye publik. Monitoring dan evaluasi yang efektif, pendekatan berbasis keluarga dan komunitas, serta perluasan layanan bantuan hukum juga sangat penting. Dengan strategi-strategi ini, perlindungan hukum bagi anak korban penyalahgunaan narkotika dapat lebih efektif, memberikan kesempatan bagi anak-anak untuk pulih dan berkembang dalam lingkungan yang mendukung.