Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN KIA (KARTU IDENTITAS ANAK) DALAM MENJAMIN PEMENUHAN HAK KONSTITUSI ANAK STATELES DI KELURAHAN PEGIRIAN KOTA SURABAYA Arya Wibisono; Achludin Ibnu Rochim; Indah Murti
Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.6578/triwikrama.v3i8.3208

Abstract

Anak stateless adalah anak yang tidak memiliki kewarganegaraan dari negara mana pun dan tidak memiliki orang tua atau wali yang bertanggung jawab atas perawatan, perlindungan, dan pendidikan mereka. Identitas kependudukan, termasuk Kartu Identitas Anak (KIA), merupakan hak fundamental penduduk yang dijamin oleh Konstitusi 1945 dan UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. KIA berperan penting dalam melindungi hak anak, mempermudah akses publik, mencegah perdagangan manusia, dan mengonfirmasi identitas anak secara resmi. Penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi kebijakan KIA untuk anak stateless di Kelurahan Pegirian, Kota Surabaya, dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan observasi. Hasil penelitian menyoroti kompleksitas implementasi kebijakan tersebut, termasuk dalam aspek Standar dan Tujuan Kebijakan, Sumber Daya Kebijakan, Kegiatan Komunikasi dan Penegakan Antar Organisasi, Karakteristik Badan Pelaksana, Kondisi Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Politik, serta Diposisi Pelaksana. Temuan ini memberikan wawasan yang berharga bagi pembuat kebijakan, praktisi, dan peneliti dalam upaya meningkatkan efektivitas dan relevansi kebijakan KIA dalam memenuhi hak-hak konstitusi anak stateless di Kelurahan Pegirian.
Right Punishment For The Performers Of Corruption Arya Wibisono; Kunta Dwi Pangestu; Rahul May Kardo Albert. D
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November 2020)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (493.422 KB) | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v1i1.35

Abstract

Corruption has been a serious problem since the days of our ancestors until now. Whatever means have been used to prevent this from happening again. But unfortunately the deterrent effect that is felt does not really make the perpetrator repent. Once the perpetrator commits an act of corruption, then once he feels the punishment. Then he does it again or even new seeds of corruption perpetrators emerge. Recently the RKUHP being drafted by the DPR has drawn a lot of criticism. How could I not, instead of creating fear and a deterrent effect, this RKUHP actually eases the punishment for corruptors. The RKUHP, which is considered to be inconsistent with the existing laws, has caused confusion among law enforcers. Weakening the side of punishments suchas fines and prison terms for corruptors will lead to more rampant corruption cases. The purpose of writing this article is to analyze what kind of punishment we have applied and assess whether the punishment is appropriate to be applied or there are still many shortcomings. Then in compiling this article the writing method used is descriptive qualitative with the data source used by the author, namely the research library, which is data obtained from existing literature from books, journals, the internet and other references that are in accordance with the research problem. Eradicating corruption from above through the KPK without any reinforcement by including provisions from the United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), such as an eagle preying on rats in a bottle of bars. Because so far, the Corruption Act has not met all the standards of the UNCAC.