Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nian Tana Sikka: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Cemara Education and Science Journal Of Psychology, Counseling And Education
Reysha Miranti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
suara pasif dan suara aktif: suara pasif M.Yusri Ali Lubis; Reysha Miranti
Cemara Education and Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Vol II. Edisi II Tahun 2024
Publisher : Cendekia Madani Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62145/ces.v2i2.52

Abstract

Background: Expert guidelines recommend using active over passive voice to improve clarity in Englishacademic writing. However, few systematic reviews synthesize research on reader outcomes from texts writtenin the passive versus active voice. This paper reviewed experimental studies comparing the effects of active andpassive voice on reader comprehension in English academic writing. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines,database searches identified quantitative studies manipulating voice in academic texts and measuringdifferential impacts on reader understanding. 9 eligible studies were analyzed narratively. Results: Studiesconsistently demonstrated reduced readability, slower processing, and lower comprehension scores for passiveversus active voice texts across reader groups and disciplines.On coherence ratings, grammatical errors, and comprehension questions, passive voice performed significantlyworse.Conclusions: Strong evidence confirms active voice improves reader comprehension over passive in academicwriting. However, strategic passive usage may still benefit writing on a situational basis. More research isneeded on providing effective instruction to EFL students on selectively deploying active/passive principles.Originality: This systematic review is the first to synthesize major studies comparing active and passive voiceimpacts on reader outcomes in academic writing. The consistent experimental results provide an empirical basisfor style guidelines favoring active voice for clarity.
Passive Voice and Active Voice in Sentence Structure M. Yusri Ali Lubis; Reysha Miranti; Yani Lubis
Journal Of Psychology, Counseling And Education Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/psy.v2i1.20

Abstract

Background: Expert guidelines recommend using active over passive voice to improve clarity in English academic writing. However, few systematic reviews synthesize research on reader outcomes from texts written in the passive versus active voice. This paper reviewed experimental studies comparing the effects of active and passive voice on reader comprehension in English academic writing. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, database searches identified quantitative studies manipulating voice in academic texts and measuring differential impacts on reader understanding. 9 eligible studies were analyzed narratively. Results: Studies consistently demonstrated reduced readability, slower processing, and lower comprehension scores for passive versus active voice texts across reader groups and disciplines. On coherence ratings, grammatical errors, and comprehension questions, passive voice performed significantly worse. Conclusions: Strong evidence confirms active voice improves reader comprehension over passive in academic writing. However, strategic passive usage may still benefit writing on a situational basis. More research is needed on providing effective instruction to EFL students on selectively deploying active/passive principles. Originality: This systematic review is the first to synthesize major studies comparing active and passive voice impacts on reader outcomes in academic writing. The consistent experimental results provide an empirical basis for style guidelines favoring active voice for clarity.
Fonetik dalam Bahasa Arab Reysha Miranti; Althaf Rifqi Alfarabi
Nian Tana Sikka : Jurnal ilmiah Mahasiswa Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Nian Tana Sikka : Jurnal ilmiah Mahasiswa
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis, Universitas Nusa Nipa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59603/niantanasikka.v3i1.664

Abstract

Phonetics is a branch of linguistics that studies the sounds of language, including how these sounds are produced, transmitted and received by listeners. In Arabic, phonetics has an important role in understanding how to pronounce sounds correctly. Arabic has a distinctive sound system consisting of vowels, consonants and semivowels, which are produced through various makhraj (places where sounds come out) in the human speech apparatus. Vowel sounds are produced without air resistance, while consonants involve resistance to certain speech organs. Apart from that, Arabic also has letters which are divided into hams (without vibration of the vocal cords) and jahr (with vibration of the vocal cords). Arabic phonetics is very important for improving pronunciation and understanding the meaning of words or sentences, because differences in pronunciation can affect the intended meaning. Therefore, phonetics is an important basis for understanding and practicing Arabic correctly.
Co-Authors Althaf Rifqi Alfarabi M. Yusri Ali Lubis M.Yusri Ali Lubis Yani Lubis