Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Evaluation Analysis of the Affective Domain in the Merdeka Belajar Kurikulum Merdeka (MBKM) at State Islamic Religious Universities (PTKIN). Andika, Arif; Yuliana, Fitri
Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME) Vol 10, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education ( Agustus)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jime.v10i3.6972

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to understand the concept of evaluating the affective domain, its challenges and implementation strategies in the independent campus learning (MBKM) curriculum at state Islamic religious universities (PTKIN). The method used is library research (Library Research) by collecting data in the form of journal articles, books, these and other sources relevant to the research theme. Data collection was carried out using documentation techniques (documentary study) and analyzed using content analysis techniques. The research results show that 1) The concept of evaluating the affective domain in Merdeka Belajar Kurikulum Merdeka (MBKM) at state Islamic religious universities (PTKIN) consists of five levels: receiving A1, responding to A2, assessing A3, organizing A4 to characterizing with an A4 value. 2) There are five challenges in evaluating the affective domain in independent learning campuses (MBKM) at state Islamic religious universities (PTKIN): Complexity of measuring affective aspects, Diversity of student backgrounds, Integration of religious and spiritual values, Limitations of evaluation instruments, Need for resources competent human resources. 3) The implementation strategy for evaluating the affective domain in Merdeka Belajar Kurikulum Merdeka (MBKM) at state Islamic religious universities (PTKIN) can be created by creating an instrument table containing the observed value aspects: aspect 1, aspect 2, aspect and so on as needed and containing percentage in each aspect. In discussion activities, for example, what is assessed are aspects of participation, contribution and class activity. The criteria are: asking questions, submitting comments on questions and Ethics.  
Non Performing Financing dan Strategi Penanganannya pada Akad Murabahah di KSPPS Risalatuna Berkah Sejahtera Andika, Arif; Afriyanti, Afriyanti; Ulyadi, Ulyadi; Muslim, Mulyadi
Risalah Iqtishadiyah Vol 4 No 1 (2025): January - June 2025
Publisher : Risalah Iqtisadiyah: Journal of Sharia Economics, Sharia Economics Study Program, STEI Ar Risalah Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59107/ri.v4i1.87

Abstract

Problematic financing is referred to as Non-Performing Financing (NPF), which includes financing with delinquent collectability and financing with doubtful collectability that has the potential to become delinquent. This study aims to examine the factors causing Non-Performing Financing and the handling strategies for Murabaha contracts at KSPPS Risalatuna Berkah Sejahtera. To achieve the objectives of this research, the author employs a descriptive qualitative research method. The data collection techniques used are documentation studies and in-depth interviews. In terms of problematic financing, KSPPS Risalatuna Berkah Sejahtera has been ineffective due to factors such as the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters, which resulted in an uncertain income for the customers. The strategies for handling Non-Performing Financing implemented by KSPPS Risalatuna Berkah Sejahtera include reducing installments, meaning providing long-term settlement time, and lowering profits by using collateral. KSPPS Risalatuna Berkah Sejahtera also seeks to resolve problematic financing through social funds and penalty funds from other customers; however, this is often not done in a timely manner.