Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi
Rofingi, Rofingi
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Distorsi Kebijakan Pemerintah Provinsi dengan Pemerintah Kabupaten terhadap Proyek PLTPB Rofingi, Rofingi
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2018) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.324 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1815

Abstract

Post-reforms goverment authority in Indonesia were no longer centralized. Decentralization then emerged as dispersion of the central goverment affairs to the regional goverment. This article discusses the incompatibility of the Geothermal Power Plant (PLTPB) project issued by the district / city government but was issued by the provincial government using the normative-analysis method. Government concurrent affairs are divided into two affairs; compulsory and optional. The existence of PLTPB in Banyumas district is one of the democratic matters of choice. One of PLTPB problems is that the regent of Banyumas do not aware of PLTPB policy. It can be seen that there is no synchronization and harmonization between the provincial and district /city governments. Negative impacts ranging from destruction of residents' land to river pollution are not handled. The authority of these provisions must be taken over by the regency / city government and there must be countermeasures against affected people so that good governance will be created.
Problems of Law Enforcement in Realizing The Principle of Equality Before The Law in Indonesia Rofingi, Rofingi; Rozah, Umi; Asga, Adifyan Rahmat
LAW REFORM Vol 18, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (258.645 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v18i2.47477

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law. The law stipulates the principle of equality before the law. There are various problems in law enforcement. These problems have led to the failure to observe the principle of equality before the law. Just as the persecution suffered by Sarpan, the police admitted that they were the perpetrators of the murder. This is different from the case of Napoleón Bonarparte and Prasetijo Utomo, the suspect of bribery to remove red notice warrant of Djoko Tjandra. In this case, Djoko Tjandra had lunch with the head of the prosecutor's office. This research is significant considering the widespread practice of law enforcement that underestimates the principle of equality before the law, so it will not discriminate against everyone when applying the law in the future. This study uses the non-doctrinal reaserch because it examines laws and regulations and their implementation to the people. From this research, it is found that due to the problems of laws and regulations that are unsuitable for the people, lacked of ethics, beliefs, resources, and transparency in the screening of order agents, the principle of equality before the law has not been implemented, and there is inconsistency in the application of the law Integration leading to the decline in public trust to the law . Therefore, these issues need to be improved to realize the principle of equality before the law in law enforcement.
Co-Authors Asga, Adifyan Rahmat Umi Rozah