Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Effect of Chain Writing Method on Students’ Writing Ability of Descriptive Text Nabilah, Rizkia; As’ari, As’ari; Rahmawati, Eulis
English Education, Linguistics, and Literature Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): February - July
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Tadris Bahasa Inggris UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32678/ell.v2i2.6175

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research is to obtain the empirical evidence on the effect of chain writing method on students' writing ability of descriptive text. This research used a quantitative method with quasi-experimental design. The sample of this research is 70 students which is divided into experimental class control class that consist 35 students for each. The results of this research show that the post-test mean score of the experimental class is higher than the post-test mean score of the control class (74 > 56). According to the result of statistic calculation, it is obtained that the score of to = 8.45 > tt = 1.67 in degree of significance 5%. The score of to = 8.45 > tt = 2.39 in degree of significance 1%. It indicates that the value of tobservation is bigger than ttable. tobservation = 8.45 > ttable.= 1.67. tobservation = 8.45 > ttable.= 2.39, so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, it proved that the chain writing method has good effect on the teaching writing of descriptive text and effective to improve students' writing ability of descriptive text.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS FOR MOTIVATING STUDENTS IN ENGLISH LEARNING AT TENTH GRADE OF MAN 2 KOTA PROBOLINGGO Kamilia, Jamilatul; As’ari, As’ari
Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Kwangsan
Publisher : Balai Besar Guru Penggerak Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31800/jtp.kw.v11n2.p639--648

Abstract

This study aims to find out the kinds of rewards and punishments which motivate students in English learning and, to find out how the implementation of rewards and punishments motivates students in English learning at Tenth grade of MAN 2 Kota Probolinggo. The research was a qualitative research. The researcher collected data from interview and observation. Observation were carried out in one classes, to strengthen research answers or as a supporting method. Interview was conducted with two English teachers to identify the research question in this research. The results from observation and interview showed several rewards used by teachers in the classroom; applause, praise, positif feedback, score, and giving gifts. While, there are some punishments used by teachers; warning, advice and give direction, deducting grades, memorizing vocabulary, standing in front of the class, and sitting squatting on a chair. It was also found that reward and punishment were applied to each class. When the teacher used reward and punishment, the teacher first observed the condition of the students and the atmosphere of the class. Students who get rewards were active, enthusiastic, fast, and correct in answering questions. On the other hand, students who get punished are unfocused, noisy, and undisciplined. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui jenis penghargaan dan hukuman yang memotivasi siswa dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris dan, untuk mengetahui bagaimana penerapan penghargaan dan hukuman memotivasi siswa dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di kelas sepuluh MAN 2 Kota Probolinggo. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif. Peneliti mengumpulkan data melalui wawancara dan observasi. Observasi dilakukan dalam satu kelas, untuk memperkuat jawaban penelitian atau sebagai metode pendukung. Wawancara dilakukan dengan dua orang guru bahasa Inggris untuk mengidentifikasi pertanyaan penelitian dalam penelitian ini. Hasil observasi dan wawancara menunjukkan beberapa reward yang digunakan guru di kelas; tepuk tangan, pujian, umpan balik positif, skor, dan pemberian hadiah. Sementara itu, ada beberapa hukuman yang digunakan oleh guru; peringatan, nasihat dan pengarahan, pengurangan nilai, menghafal kosa kata, berdiri di depan kelas, dan duduk jongkok di kursi. Ditemukan juga bahwa reward dan punishment diterapkan pada setiap kelas. Pada saat guru menggunakan reward dan punishment, guru terlebih dahulu mengamati keadaan siswa dan suasana kelas. Siswa yang mendapat reward aktif, antusias, cepat, dan benar dalam menjawab pertanyaan. Sebaliknya siswa yang mendapat hukuman adalah siswa yang tidak fokus, ribut, dan tidak disiplin. 
ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN DAN EFEKTIVITAS PEMERATAAN PROGRAM KIP KULIAH: STUDI KASUS DI PTN DAN PTS PROVINSI LAMPUNG Ecta Rianisa, Devi; As’ari, As’ari; Mahmud, Imam; Raidar, Usman; Wibisono, Damar
Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 7 No. 9 (2025): Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.6578/triwikrama.v7i9.12041

Abstract

The Indonesia Smart Card (KIP) Lecture program is a government initiative to increase access to higher education for students from underprivileged families. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the KIP Lecture program in equalizing access to higher education by comparing the experiences of recipient and non-recipient students at one of the state and private universities in Lampung Province. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews and literature studies. The results showed that KIP Kuliah plays a role in easing the financial burden of students, allowing them to focus more on academics and increasing involvement in campus organizations. However, there are still significant administrative obstacles, especially in the delay of fund disbursement and the lack of transparency of information regarding aid procedures, which are felt more by students in PTS than PTN. In addition, there are still students from well-off families who receive assistance, causing problems related to targeting accuracy. These findings indicate that although the KIP Kuliah program has contributed to expanding access to education, improvements in the disbursement mechanism, information transparency, and recipient selection are still needed to optimize the benefits. This study recommends improving coordination between the government and educational institutions, reforming the disbursement policy, and strengthening the selection mechanism of KIP Kuliah recipients to increase the effectiveness and equity of the program. Thus, KIP Kuliah can become a stronger instrument in reducing inequality in higher education in Indonesia.