Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NOTARIUS Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jambura Law Review Law Development Journal
Mahfud, Muh Afif
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Constitutionality of Simultaneous Extension and Renewal of Land Rights Mahfud, Muh Afif; Djohan, Naufal Hasanuddin; Malik, Muhammad Fahad
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 1: April 2024: Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v12i1.1360

Abstract

One form of state control is to regulate the granting of land rights, including determining the subject of the right and the duration of a land right. The determination of the period of land rights must pay attention to equality of opportunity and access in acquiring and controlling land so as to create the greatest prosperity of the people as the goal of national agrarian law. This is a normative research that focuses on examining the harmony between regulations so that it uses a statute approach and conceptual approach. Therefore, primary legal materials and secondary legal materials obtained based on literature research are used. The data obtained was then analyzed based on content analysis. In this research, it is found that there are overlapping regulations between the Basic Agrarian Law, Governmental Regulation No. 40 of 1996, Agrarian Minister Regulation No. 18 of 2021 and Government Regulation No. 12 of 2023 regarding the extension and renewal of land rights at the same time. In addition, in reality, the simultaneous extension and renewal of land rights causes several things, namely: (1) legal uncertainty because there are regulations as the basis that collide with each other; (2) inequality and injustice for the community in accessing land; and (3) presents unconstitutionality because basically this policy has violated the Constitutional Court's decision.
Notary Liability When Committing Disgraceful Acts Islamianiati, Andina Arityas; Mahfud, Muh Afif
Law Development Journal Vol 5, No 3 (2023): September 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.5.3.315-329

Abstract

Disgraceful acts are regulated in Article 9 paragraph 1 letter c of Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Office of a Notary. Disgraceful acts are degrading honor and dignity, such as gambling, drinking, using drugs and adultery. Meanwhile, disgraceful acts are those who have committed acts that are not in accordance with existing norms in Indonesia such as religious norms, decency and customs. The purpose of this research is to find out what are the types of dismissal of a notary and how is the responsibility of a notary who has committed a disgraceful act. The research method used is normative juridical research. The source of legal material used by the author is secondary data. The result of the research is that a Notary who is caught committing a violation of a disgraceful act as stated in Article 9 paragraph 1 letter C of Act No. 2 of 2014 Concerning Notary Positions, the board of trustees decides for the notary to be temporarily dismissed for 6 months based on the Notary Office Law.
Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris (Studi Kasus Nomor 79/Pdt.G/2016/Pn.Kpg) Dewi, Tri Buana; Mahfud, Muh Afif
Notarius Vol 17, No 3 (2024): Notarius
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/nts.v17i3.50756

Abstract

ABSTRACTNotary can get involved in problem by participating providing false information in an authentic deed. This happens when the appearer comes to the Notary giving information and fake grants in transferring the title of SHM. The method of approach used is normative juridical, which uses qualitative analysis with deductive logic. The data sources used are secondary data and primary data obtained from literature studies. This research found that sanction,liability for notary defendants cannot all be given simultaneously because the una via principle in law and legal protection that can be given to Notaries the prosecution general public and judges must be carried out by obtaining the approval of the MKN and the existence of legal protection from the notary parent organization (INI).Keywords: Accountabilit; Notary; False InformationABSTRAKNotaris dapat terbawa kedalam permasalahan turut serta memberikan keterangan palsu kedalam akta otentik. Hal ini terjadi apabila penghadap datang kepada Notaris memberikan keterangan, hibah palsu dalam melakukan balik nama SHM. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, yang menggunakan analisis kualitatif dengan logika deduktif. Adapun sumber data yang dipergunakan adalah data sekunder dan data primer diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Penelitian ini mendapatkan hasil bahwa sanksi, pertanggungjawaban bagi terdakwa Notaris tidak semuanya dapat serta merta diberikan secara bersamaan karena terdapat asas una via dalam hukum. serta perlindungan hukum yang dapat diberikan kepada Notaris dalam proses penegakan hukum di persidangan dapat dilakukan melalui proses, yaitu: penuntut umum dan hakim harus dilakukan dengan mendapatkan persetujuan MKN serta adanya perlindungan hukum dari induk organisasi Notaris (INI).  Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban; Notaris; Keterangan Palsu
Land Bank in Indonesia: Disoriented Authority, Overlapping Regulations and Injustice Mahfud, Muh Afif; Djohan, Naufal Hasanuddin; Malik, Muhammad Fahad
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 6 NO. 2 JULY 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24166

Abstract

The Indonesian Lank Bank Agency (“Land Bank”) is a sui generis institution that has broad authority including providing convenience for investors and implementing agrarian reform based on the value of justice and legal certainty. This paper aims to analyze the disorientation of authority and overlapping regulations of the Land Bank, examine the Land Bank's authority based on the cybernetic concept of Talcott Parsons and deconstruct the Land Bank‘s authority in terms of the value of justice. This research is a normative study that uses secondary data collected through literature research and analyzed the data through content analysis. Based on the analysis, it is found that there is a disorientation of the Land Bank‘s authority as its authority to implement the agrarian reform aimed at creating equitable land ownership is contradictory to its authority to facilitate investments that use large areas of land. The implementation of agrarian reform by the Land Bank also faces overlapping regulations and authority. Based on Talcott Parsons' cybernetic concept, the Indonesian government prioritizes investment facilitation authority (economic subsystem) which has the highest energy and therefore ignore agrarian reform (social subsystem) which has lower energy. This is not in line with the principle of justice, namely partiality to the disadvantaged party since it prioritizes the interests of business entities as the more economically advantaged party and overrides the interests of people who do not own land or control land less than the minimum limit.
Co-Authors Dewi, Tri Buana Djohan, Naufal Hasanuddin Islamianiati, Andina Arityas Malik, Muhammad Fahad