Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice PUSKAPSI Law Review
Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Enforcement of the Code of Ethics for 2024 Election Organizers in Indonesia: A Substantive Justice Perspective Didik Suhariyanto; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara; Sinta Dyah Kirana
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v12i2.1441

Abstract

This study employs a normative legal research approach focusing on conceptual and legislative analysis. Its aim is to examine the dynamics of the enforcement of the electoral organizers’ code of ethics by the Indonesian Election Supervisory Agency (DKPP) and to formulate a reconstruction of this enforcement aimed at achieving substantive justice. The findings assert that the enforcement dynamics of the electoral organizers’ code of ethics by DKPP inherently pose two main issues. Internally, the enforcement requires oversight and public participation to ensure DKPP’s credibility and integrity in upholding the code of ethics. Externally, issues arise regarding the final and binding nature of DKPP decisions, which have been undermined by Constitutional Court rulings, allowing for their annulment by judicial bodies such as the Administrative Court (PTUN). Reconstruction or reform efforts concerning the enforcement of the electoral code of ethics for electoral administrators, based on substantive justice, necessitate a clear affirmation of the independence of ethical norms, particularly those related to the conduct of electoral administrators. This includes ensuring that the enforcement of these ethical norms is immune from legal norms and external intervention. Additionally, there is a need for a revision of the electoral laws in Indonesia to enhance the appeal process for ethical judgments rendered by the Election Supervisory Board (DKPP), which are final and binding and cannot be overturned by the courts, especially the Administrative Court (PTUN).
Realizing Restorative Justice-Based Villages: Orientation and Formulation in a Progressive Legal Perspective Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): March : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i1.539

Abstract

The concept of restorative justice which emphasizes the recovery of victims as well as community participation is appropriate to be applied at the village level as an effort to create a village based on restorative justice. This study aims to formulate the idea of ​​a village based on restorative justice by involving community participation. This research is a normative legal research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study show that a village orientation based on restorative justice is intended to optimize the role of non-litigation dispute resolution in village communities. From a progressive legal perspective, a village based on restorative justice is a village with the aim of maintaining social harmony in resolving disputes in society. Therefore, the formation of Village Regulations is important as a guideline for implementing the concept of restorative justice in village communities.
Overcriminalization dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Tantangan terhadap Prinsip Konstitusionalitas dan Ideologi Pancasila Saragih, Geofani Milthree; M.O.Saut Hamonangan Turnip; Ariska Cesar Divian Candra Kusuma; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): PUSKAPSI Law Review
Publisher : PUSKAPSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v5i2.60001

Abstract

Fenomena overcriminalization dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia semakin menonjol seiring dengan berkembangnya regulasi yang cenderung menempatkan hukum pidana sebagai instrumen utama penyelesaian masalah sosial. Kondisi ini menimbulkan problematika serius karena melahirkan inflasi kriminalisasi, mempersempit ruang kebebasan individu, serta berpotensi bertentangan dengan prinsip-prinsip konstitusional yang dijamin dalam UUD 1945, terutama mengenai hak asasi manusia dan asas legalitas. Selain itu, penggunaan hukum pidana yang berlebihan kerap mengabaikan nilai-nilai dasar Pancasila sebagai ideologi bangsa yang menekankan keseimbangan antara keadilan, kemanusiaan, dan kemaslahatan sosial. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara kritis implikasi overcriminalization terhadap prinsip konstitusionalitas dan Pancasila, serta menawarkan alternatif pendekatan dalam perumusan kebijakan pidana yang lebih proporsional. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, dan komparatif, melalui analisis literatur, doktrin hukum, serta putusan pengadilan relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa overcriminalization berpotensi mengikis jaminan konstitusional warga negara, melemahkan legitimasi hukum, dan bertentangan dengan semangat keadilan sosial yang menjadi pilar utama Pancasila. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembatasan yang tegas dalam penggunaan instrumen pidana dengan mengedepankan prinsip ultimum remedium, rasionalisasi peraturan perundang-undangan, serta penguatan nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam kebijakan kriminal agar hukum pidana tetap selaras dengan cita hukum Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ariska Cesar Divian Candra Kusuma Didik Suhariyanto M.O.Saut Hamonangan Turnip Saragih, Geofani Milthree Sinta Dyah Kirana