Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum Islam Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam
Saidou, Ouedraogo
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pancasila dan Piagam Madinah: Konvergensi Nilai-Nilai dalam Prespektif Ideologi Negara Dzikrullah Faza, M.; Ghulam, Hafiz; Saidou, Ouedraogo
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 16 No 1 (2024): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.7529

Abstract

As a country with the largest number of Muslim populations in the world, the ideology of Pancasila is often contradicted, as if it is incompatible with the identity of an Islamic state. In fact, the debate about the form and sovereignty of the Indonesian state is final and discussed strictly by the hero of the proclamation of independence. This article is classified as literature research with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is content analysis and a comparative study between the Pancasila ideology and the Medina Charter. The results of the study concluded two things: first, the Prophet did not specifically formulate the formal form of an Islamic state, but what the Prophet emphasized was the importance of a state that adheres to Islamic values. Second, although Indonesia is not an Islamic country, the ideology of Pancasila does not contradict, let alone ignore, the essence of Islam and the existence of adherents to it.
Comparative Analysis Of Salam, Samsarah, And Wakalah As Shariah Compliant Models For Dropshipping Transactions Faza, M. Dzikrullah; Kharis, Aghus Jamaludin; Saidou, Ouedraogo
Hukum Islam Vol 25, No 2 (2025): ISLAMIC LAW
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v25i2.38510

Abstract

This study proposes a new comparative fiqh framework to reassess the Sharīʿah legality of dropshipping practices by systematically mapping their business characteristics against the pillars and conditions of three classical contracts—Salam, Samsarah, and Wakālah—within the context of contemporary e-commerce and platform-based trade, which has not yet been comprehensively formulated in previous studies of fiqh al-muʿāmalāt. The research employs a qualitative approach using content analysis and literature review, focusing on classical and contemporary fiqh texts. The analysis applies muqāranah al-madhāhib, synthesized with maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, through the methods of taḥqīq al-manāṭ and qiyās istinbāṭī. The findings indicate that although the dropshipping model is efficient in addressing capital and inventory constraints for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), it fundamentally violates the principle of Bayʿ Mā Lā Yamlik (selling what one does not own) and is highly susceptible to gharar concerning ownership (milkiyyah), product specifications, and delivery time. Consequently, Sharīʿah law requires dropshippers to promptly convert their contractual status. This study proposes three Sharīʿah-compliant alternatives: Samsarah, Wakālah or Salam. The study concludes that Wakālah represents the lowest gharar-risk model and offers the most consistent framework for clarifying ownership, risk allocation, and contractual responsibility among the parties involved in the transaction chain.
Co-Authors Dzikrullah Faza, M. Faza, M. Dzikrullah Ghulam, Hafiz Kharis, Aghus Jamaludin