Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of the Principle of Common Heritage of Mankind According to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 Sitompul, Mhd. Nasir
International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML)
Publisher : International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59712/iaml.v3i2.93

Abstract

Common Heritage of Mankind is a principle in the International Law of the Sea system where the principle provides freedom of Natural Resources contained in the International Seabed or Seabed Area. The regulation of international law authorizes an international organization called the International Seabed Authority to carry out its role as supervision of the implementation of the principles of Common Heritage of Mankind in the International Seabed area. Article 136 of the International Convention on the Law of the Sea, Part XI of the Area states that “ the area and its resources are the common heritage of mankind”. In applying the principles of the Common Heritage of Mankind contained in Chapter XI UNCLOS 1982 was implemented under the Implementation Agreement 1994 which then established an international organization authorized to fully regulate and manage the resources that exist in the seabed and Deep Ocean where the common heritage of mankind on behalf of it acts.
COMPARISON OF RAPE IN INDONESIAN POSITIVE LAW, ISLAMIC LAW AND SOUTH KOREAN LAW Sitompul, Mhd. Nasir; Iskandar Muda Sipayung; Aisyah; Rilawadi Sahputra; Dody Safnul
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4225

Abstract

This paper initiated the study of Comparative Law in criminal rape. The crime of rape is a crime as a violation of human rights. Rape is a form of crime that causes loss and anxiety in the community, rape often occurs but is always difficult to prosecute because one of them is the reluctance of victims to report it, this is because there is still a culture of shame attached to the community. Each country has its own atauran in handling and tackling rape cases that occur in the country. In making a legal comparison, of course, what is interesting to compare is the comparison with other countries that adhere to the civil law legal system and other countries that adhere to the common law system. This study uses normative research methods with legislation and conceptual approach. There are similarities and differences in the criminal regulation of rape in positive law in Indonesia , Islamic law and statutory rape in South Korea. The similarities lie in: first, the arrangements regarding rape by force or threat of violence; Second, The Rape of minors. While the differences that can be compared are: 1) rape of disability; 2) the element of consent; 3) length of punishment; 4) the object of Rape; 5) Blood rape; and 6) rape in marriage (marital rape).