Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pembaruan Hukum Wasiat Wajibah bagi Anak Kandung Pernikahan yang Tidak Dicatat di Indonesia Abdul Kafi; Muhammad Semman; Muhammad Yazidi Rahman
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v8i1.12845

Abstract

Anak dari pernikahan yang tidak dicatat dianggap tidak memiliki hubungan dengan ayahnya khususnya dalam hal waris. Sehingga untuk mengakomodir kepentingan terbaik bagi anak, maka dapat menempuh jalur wasiat wajibah sebagai alternatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tinjauan hukum Islam terhadap wasiat wajibah bagi anak kandung pada pernikahan yang tidak dicatat. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan mengumpulkan data dari berbagai sumber termasuk buku, jurnal, dan tulisan lainnya. Analisis data penelitian dilakukan dengan teknik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan anak dari pernikahan yang tidak dicatatkan tidak memiliki hubungan kewarisan dengan ayahnya. Pembaharuan hukum di Indonesia justru memberikan hak kepada anak melalui jalur lain yaitu wasiat wajibah melalui SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Rumusan Kamar Agama. Kendati demikian, porsi yang didapatkan anak kandung terbatas pada 1/3 harta, sedangkan hakikatnya anak mendapatkan porsi yang jelas menurut porsi waris dalam hukum Islam.
Studi Komparatif Aliran Besar Metode Sunnah Bil-Wus’a Ahmad Bin Hanbal Dan Metode Mashlahah Mursalah Malik Bin Anas Dalam Metodologi Studi Hukum Islam Muhammad Yazidi Rahman
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): This volume covers topics such as women's rights, inheritance law, crime preven
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v2i4.834

Abstract

Islamic law has a complex and adaptive system, based on the Qur'an and Hadith as the main sources, and ijma and qiyas as complementary instruments to answer contemporary problems. In understanding and formulating Islamic law, there are two major schools of thought: the textualist school (Ahlul Hadith) and the rationalist school (Ahlur Ra'yi). The textualist school focuses on a literal understanding of the holy text, maintaining the authenticity of Islamic law as practiced during the time of the Prophet. Meanwhile, the rationalist school prioritizes reason and context in determining the law, making it more dynamic to adapt to modern challenges. The literature study research method is used to analyze the differences and similarities in the approaches of these two schools. The research was conducted by collecting relevant literature from various academic sources, analyzing the legal istinbath method applied, and identifying the strengths and challenges of each school. The results of the study show that the textualist school provides stability and loyalty to Islamic teachings, while the rationalist school offers flexibility in dealing with social change. The combination of these two approaches creates Islamic law that is strongly principled but remains relevant. This study emphasizes the importance of synergy between the textualist and rationalist approaches in answering the legal needs of Muslims in the modern era without ignoring its spiritual essence