Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KOMUNIKASI INTERRELIGIUS: TELAAH TAFSIR QS. AL-AN’AM AYAT 108 Ela Indah Dwi Syayekti; Shinta Nurrohmah; Nisa Afifah
Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin dan Filsafat Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023): Juli - Desember 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/rsy.v19i2.2052

Abstract

Currently, the inter-religious tolerance movement is being called upon, considering the many religious conflicts that have occurred in Indonesia. Tolerance is a form of respect and not imposing will on others. However, currently, there are still many cases of insulting other religions, both in terms of offerings or ways of worship. This happens because there is still fanaticism and radicalism which considers the teachings of one's own religion to be the most correct, considering the teachings of other religions to be heretical or infidel because they are different from their religion. This study aims to explain how ethics communicates with other religions. Literature research is used as a method in this study, namely by collecting and analyzing the interpretations of the verses used. The results of this study are QS. al-An'am (6): 108 gives advice to Muslims not to insult God and the teachings of other religions even though they are emotional or feel disturbed. Not only in cases of idols but also in other religions. On the other hand, Muslims must communicate in a polite and gentle way so that sympathy from other religions arises and good relations are established.
Pernyataan Kontroversial Pejabat Negara Dalam Pemberitaan Media (Analisis Framing pada Detik.com dan Kompas.com) Chandra Agustin, Dinar Ayu; Danang Trijayanto; Ela Indah Dwi Syayekti
Kediri Journal of Journalism and Digital Media (KJOURDIA) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): KJOURDIA: Kediri Journal of Journalism and Digital Media
Publisher : Fakultas Usluhuddin dan Dakwah IAIN Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/kjourdia.v3i2.3302

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and compare the media framing of the Indonesian Minister of Finance's controversial statements regarding the "17+8" demands, which triggered a political communication crisis. Utilizing a qualitative approach with the Robert N. Entman framing analysis model, the study compares nine news articles from the online portals Kompas.com (4 articles) and Detik.com (5 articles) published between September 9 and 10, 2025. The results indicate that both media effectively served a function of social control by maintaining a consensus on demanding moral accountability from the official. However, a significant difference in problem diagnosis was found: Kompas.com framed the issue as systemic, criticizing the political elite's mentality of dismissing public demands, whereas Detik.com focused on the personal dimension, highlighting the official's failure in adapting his communication ethics. This contrast leads to a main conclusion: that state officials are required to possess not only substantive competence and professional ability, but must also be equipped with deep empathy and behavioral accountability in all public communication. The result of this study contribute to strengthening research in the fields of political communication and media framing analysis, particularly by highlighting how media discourse construction shapes public perception of communication crises involving state afficials.