Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA
Tigor, Antonius Alexander
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Authority of the Dispute Council in the Resolution of Construction Disputes in Indonesia Vidyapramatya, Nurindria Naharista; Latifah, Emmy; Farida, Elfia; Tigor, Antonius Alexander
LAW REFORM Vol 19, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v19i1.49141

Abstract

The Dispute Council is a construction dispute resolution forum mandated by Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Construction Services. The existence of the Dispute Council as a construction dispute resolution forum is actually not much different from other alternative dispute resolution forums, such as negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. However, the Construction Services Law mandates that a Dispute Council be formed by the parties simultaneously with the preparation of a construction work contract. In practice, decisions made by the Dispute Council are often not final and binding if one of the parties is not willing to implement the decision of the Dispute Council. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the authorities between the Dispute Council and other alternative dispute resolution forums. This research was normative research. The data used were secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used literature study, and the data analysis technique used qualitative analysis. The results of the research show that the dispute resolution process with the Dispute Council is ineffective because it takes a long time. Parties who do not want to implement the decision of the Dispute Council will continue the dispute resolution process to arbitration. In fact, when the arbitration process fails, the dispute is submitted to court. This situation becomes more effective and saves time when the resolution of construction disputes directly uses arbitration without going through the Dispute Council first.
Complaints Regarding Trademark Crimes Against Trademark Holders and Consumer Protection Masrur, Devica Rully; Irawati, Irawati; Tigor, Antonius Alexander
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 7, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i3.492-513

Abstract

The background of this paper is the existence of illegal trademark infringement according to the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law on registered trademarks by other parties, especially for the same or similar goods or services that have the potential to mislead consumers. Referring to this, trademark crimes can only be reported as absolute offenses that can only be reported by trademark holders. The purpose of this study is to examine the mechanism of absolute offenses in the enforcement of trademark criminal law in Indonesia based on the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law, as well as its implications for the protection of trademark holders and consumers. This research is normative legal research with a legislative approach. The results of the study state that the initiation of criminal proceedings is entirely through the mechanism of absolute complaint offenses. However, these absolute complaint offenses have the potential to hinder the enforcement of trademark infringement laws, because the provisions of complaint offenses in trademark crimes are also not in line with the objectives of consumer protection as stipulated in the Consumer Protection Law. The conclusion obtained from this study is based on the theory of Roscoe Pound's balance and Pancasila Prismatics, it is necessary to re-arrange the absolute complaint offense from trademark crimes to relative complaint offenses. Thus, consumers as parties who are directly harmed by the circulation of counterfeit goods have the legitimacy to file a criminal trademark complaint
Co-Authors Elfia Farida Emmy Latifah Irawati Irawati Masrur, Devica Rully Vidyapramatya, Nurindria Naharista