Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurisprudence Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas JOURNAL OF PRIVATE AND COMMERCIAL LAW JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA
Masrur, Devica Rully
Faculty Of Law, Esa Unggul University
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN SUMBER DAYA GENETIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PATEN Masrur, Devica Rully
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Vol 8, No 2, Desember 2018
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v8i2.6994

Abstract

AbstractThe use of genetic resources in several countries is currently increasing. However, the theft of genetic resources and/or traditional knowledge for commercial purposes (biopircay) and misuse of genetic resources (misappropriation) are also increasing. The Intellectual Property Rights regime, specifically Patents and Plant Variety Protection does not provide sufficient protection for genetic resources and traditional knowledge. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 1992 provided opportunity for regulating the protection of biological resources that had begun to become extinct because they were used freely by world pharmaceutical companies. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the CBD 2010 and FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPRFA) 2004 provide provisions regarding access to genetic resources carried out based on mutually agreed terms, prior informed consent dan fair and equitable of benefit sharing. Indonesia has ratified various international agreements relating to access to genetic resources and currently Indonesia has Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patent which also regulates that Indonesia's genetic resources are protected. The presence of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patent complements the Indonesian government's efforts to save genetic resources from biopiracy and misappropriation. With various national policies at this moment, we can analyze appropriate efforts to strengthen the protection of genetic resources in Indonesia by continuing to open cooperation with foreign parties to jointly utilize Indonesia's genetic resources with fair benefit sharing.  
UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN SUMBER DAYA GENETIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PATEN Devica Rully Masrur
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol 8, No 2 (2018): Vol 8, No 2, Desember 2018
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v8i2.6994

Abstract

AbstractThe use of genetic resources in several countries is currently increasing. However, the theft of genetic resources and/or traditional knowledge for commercial purposes (biopircay) and misuse of genetic resources (misappropriation) are also increasing. The Intellectual Property Rights regime, specifically Patents and Plant Variety Protection does not provide sufficient protection for genetic resources and traditional knowledge. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 1992 provided opportunity for regulating the protection of biological resources that had begun to become extinct because they were used freely by world pharmaceutical companies. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the CBD 2010 and FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPRFA) 2004 provide provisions regarding access to genetic resources carried out based on mutually agreed terms, prior informed consent dan fair and equitable of benefit sharing. Indonesia has ratified various international agreements relating to access to genetic resources and currently Indonesia has Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patent which also regulates that Indonesia's genetic resources are protected. The presence of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patent complements the Indonesian government's efforts to save genetic resources from biopiracy and misappropriation. With various national policies at this moment, we can analyze appropriate efforts to strengthen the protection of genetic resources in Indonesia by continuing to open cooperation with foreign parties to jointly utilize Indonesia's genetic resources with fair benefit sharing.  
Drug Patent Monopoly During Covid-19 Outbreaks: How the Government Regulates this? Devica Rully Masrur; Ogah Chinyere Constance
Journal of Private and Commercial Law Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.44391

Abstract

Health is an inherent human right constitutionally guaranteed, and during the Global Covid-19 Pandemic, the Indonesian government faced a delicate balance between safeguarding public health and complying with its obligations as a member of the WTO under the TRIPS Agreement, which mandates patent protection for medicines, medical devices, and vaccines, crucially needed during the pandemic. International and national laws have addressed these challenges through the TRIPs Protector Article, providing options for member states to take specific measures, such as Parallel Imports, Bolar Provisions, Compulsory Licenses, and Government Use of Patents. These solutions demonstrate that even in emergency situations, the rights of inventors can still be upheld while ensuring access to essential medicines for the public. In the case of Indonesia, the government employed the Government Use of Patents policy through Presidential Regulations Number 77 of 2020, Number 100 of 2021, and Number 101 of 2021, pertaining to Remdesivir and Favipiravir medicines, respectively. This approach, though involving compulsory acquisition, is time-limited, non-exclusive, and provides fair compensation to patent holders, reflecting a balanced and just approach to addressing the critical public health needs during the pandemic.
ADVOKASI HUKUM UNTUK KOPERASI MELALUI KEGIATAN KLINIK KOPERASI DINAS KOPERASI DAN USAHA MIKRO KABUPATEN TANGERANG Masrur, Devica Rully
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AbdiMas Vol 9, No 01 (2022): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Abdimas
Publisher : Universitas Esa Unggul

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/abd.v9i01.5792

Abstract

Koperasi merupakan gerakan ekonomi rakyat yang memegang peranan penting dalam perekonomian Indonesia dan mempunyai kontribusi yang besar terhadap peningkatan dan pemerataan pendapatan di Indonesia. Namun demikian, koperasi-koperasi di Indonesia saat ini menurun disebabkan berbagai persoalan, begitupula kondisi koperasi-koperasi di Kabupaten Tangerang yang secara statistik banyak berstatus tidak aktif, baik kegiatannya maupun legalitas kelembaganya. Kajian ini menguraikan tentang kegiatan advokasi hukum bagi koperasi unit desa yang menghadapi permasalahan hukum melalui kegiatan coaching clinic  di Dinas Koperasi dan Usaha Mikro Kabupaten Tangerang. Dari kegiatan tersebut, terdapat dua hal yang menjadi perhatian dan perlu penyelesaian, yaitu legalitas lembaga koperasi yang sudah lama tidak aktif dan aset-aset koperasi yang tidak dapat dikelola dengan baik disebabkan manajemen koperasi yang tidak bekerja dengan baik. Analisis dan rekomendasi dari permasalahan tersebut adalah pembubaran koperasi atau mengaktifkan kembali koperasi melalui rapat anggota khusus, untuk diajukan kepada Dinas Koperasi Dan Usaha Mikro. Perihal masalah aset koperasi dapat ditempuh melalui hukum perdata maupun hukum pidana. Kata kunci: koperasi, legalitas, aset koperasi
Biopiracy and the Regulatory Framework for Material Transfer Agreements in Indonesia Masrur, Devica Rully; Yulia, Yulia; Zainol, Zinatul Ashiqin; Akpoviri, Frank I
LAW REFORM Vol 20, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v20i1.57001

Abstract

Biopiracy, the misappropriation of biological and genetic resources including the ones related to traditional knowledge, is a major challenge to some of the world’s megadiverse countries. Indonesia has been a major victim of biopiracy, facilitated by the current patent system. This article examines the case of Indonesia, the second richest of the seventeen identified megadiverse countries. The patent system aims to protect the rights of inventors, but the patent system causes injustice in cases of biopiracy. This research aims to analyse the Indonesian government's policies in dealing with biopiracy cases in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research which uses the approaches of national and international law, biopiracy case, and conceptual. The Indonesian government has changed the patent law to deal with biopiracy cases through Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patent disclosure requirements and has also introduced the Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs) in 2009 to address this problem. They can help in controlling access to the country’s resources based on prior informed consent, promoting collaboration between local and foreign researchers, and ensuring benefit-sharing. However, the realization of these objectives may be undermined by the country’s lack of capacity to monitor compliance with the MTA conditions, the inappropriate use of Intellectual property rights (IPRs), and MTA provisions that allow recipients to transfer material and derivatives to third parties without the country’s consent.
Legal Framework of Community-Based Water Resource Management to Achieve SDGs and “No One Left Behind” Rosita Candrakirana; Affan Akbareldi; Adinda Rizky Fajri; Devica Rully Masrur
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 24, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.1.3892

Abstract

This study aims to examine community-based water resources management implemented in Umbul Ponggok Village, Klaten Regency, Central Java, Indonesia, based on the Water Resources Law (2019) and was subsequently modified by the Job Creation Law (2023), which prioritizes the well-being of the local community and in order to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs), especially the principle of No.-One Left Behind. Community involvement in water resources management is very important. Therefore, communities no longer only act as consumers but also as those who determine their own needs for water resources. One area that has implemented this approach is the community in Ponggok Village, Klaten Regency. Therefore, this study addressed the compliance of the community-based water resource management in Ponggok Village, Klaten Regency, with the existing regulations. The study also determined whether the community complies with the principles of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through a juridical-empirical method. Data was collected through documentation and interviews, and qualitatively analyzed. The result showed that the practices of water resource management in Ponggok Village aligned with existing regulations. However, a notable gap existed in adhering to reporting regulations, attributed to a lack of awareness among the village apparatus. Then, the water resource management in Ponggok Village has fully aligned with the current regulations and the SDGs' principles.
Complaints Regarding Trademark Crimes Against Trademark Holders and Consumer Protection Masrur, Devica Rully; Irawati, Irawati; Tigor, Antonius Alexander
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Vol 7, No 3 (2025)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v7i3.492-513

Abstract

The background of this paper is the existence of illegal trademark infringement according to the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law on registered trademarks by other parties, especially for the same or similar goods or services that have the potential to mislead consumers. Referring to this, trademark crimes can only be reported as absolute offenses that can only be reported by trademark holders. The purpose of this study is to examine the mechanism of absolute offenses in the enforcement of trademark criminal law in Indonesia based on the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law, as well as its implications for the protection of trademark holders and consumers. This research is normative legal research with a legislative approach. The results of the study state that the initiation of criminal proceedings is entirely through the mechanism of absolute complaint offenses. However, these absolute complaint offenses have the potential to hinder the enforcement of trademark infringement laws, because the provisions of complaint offenses in trademark crimes are also not in line with the objectives of consumer protection as stipulated in the Consumer Protection Law. The conclusion obtained from this study is based on the theory of Roscoe Pound's balance and Pancasila Prismatics, it is necessary to re-arrange the absolute complaint offense from trademark crimes to relative complaint offenses. Thus, consumers as parties who are directly harmed by the circulation of counterfeit goods have the legitimacy to file a criminal trademark complaint
Co-Authors Adinda Rizky Fajri Affan Akbareldi Akpoviri, Frank I Irawati Irawati Ogah Chinyere Constance Rosita Candrakirana Tigor, Antonius Alexander Yulia Yulia Zinatul Ashiqin Zainol