Abdul Muid N
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Larangan Menistakan Agama Dalam Al-Qur’ân Antara Fardu Ain dan Kifayah: Studi Komparatif Atas Tafsir Ibn Katsîr dan Tafsir Al-Mishbâh Lalu Muhammad Idham Khalid; Abdul Muid N; Muhammad Adlan Nawawi
Tabsyir: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): Juli : Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/tabsyir.v4i3.218

Abstract

Today, in times of increasingly complex public problems and the need for religious references has escalated, there is a spirit to answer this with individual and collective da'wah movements. This condition in the opinion of researchers is very good, but often there is a bias in the basic understanding of who is actually entitled and obliged to convey da'wah (who has the right to prohibit blasphemy) and how the law is actually based on the perspective of the Qur'an. The purpose of this study to explore the interpretation of Ibn Katsîr and M. Quraish Shihâb regarding the obligation of Da'wah and the implications of the sociohistorical background of both. The approach used in this study is qualitative with comparative study method. Data collection techniques in the form of literature and observation studies were analyzed in the form of descriptive data collection techniques with the method of comparative analysis (analytical-comparative method). The results showed that there are differences in the tendency of interpretation as well as interpretation between Ibn Katsîr with M. Quraish Shihâb. Ibn Katsîr directed the obligation of Da'wah (which has the right to prohibit blasphemy) as an individual obligation while M. Quraish shihâb directs the tendency of the interpretation of the obligation as a collective obligation also with some similarities in the interpretation of which still accommodate obligations that are not used as a tendency of interpretation
Nâsikh Mansûkh Dan Implementasinya dalam Tafsir Al-Qur`an ul Majid An-Nūr Karya Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy M. Irfanuddin; Abdul Muid N; Zakaria Husin Lubis
Bersatu: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Mei : Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika
Publisher : LPPM Politeknik Pratama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/bersatu.v1i3.319

Abstract

The concept of naskh and mansukh is very important to understand the development of Islamic law. With the existence of texts, the last verses of the Qur'an that were revealed are considered more valid and replace the previous verses. This study aims to examine the concepts of naskh (cancellation) and mansukh (absolute cancellation) in Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy's Tafsir Al-Qur'anul Majid An-Nur, and identify their implementation in the interpretation of Al-Qur'anic verses. In his commentary, Ash-Shiddieqy identifies verses that are considered as texts and mansukh, and explains the relationship between these verses. The research method used is text analysis with a qualitative approach. The results of the study show that Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy paid considerable attention to the concepts of naskh and mansukh in his interpretations. He described how changes to law or shari'a provisions were carried out through texts and mansukh. Apart from that, Ash-Shiddieqy also gave an explanation of the purpose and wisdom behind the cancellation of these verses. These previous studies have related or intersected the same problem, but in a very different context. This research makes an important contribution in understanding Muhammad Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy's view of the concept of naskh and mansukh in the interpretation of the Qur'an. These findings can provide better insight into how a contemporary scholar understands and applies the concepts of naskh and mansukh in the interpretation of the Qur'an.