Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTISI Buletin Konstitusi Law_Jurnal INSPIRING LAW JOURNAL
Sibarani, Fauzi Anshari
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN PRINSIP THE BEST INTEREST OF CHILD TERHADAP ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA KESUSILAAN (STUDI DI KEPOLISIAN DAERAH SUMATERA UTARA) Sibarani, Fauzi Anshari; Ablisar, Madiasa; Marlina, Marlina; Ikhsan, Edy
BULETIN KONSTITUSI Vol 3, No 1 (2022): Vol. 3 No. 1
Publisher : BULETIN KONSTITUSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/konstitusi.v3i1.9921

Abstract

Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children (UU SPPA) brings fundamental changes to the juvenile justice system in Indonesia. This can be seen from the adoption of the principle of best interest for children which comes from Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and ratified by the Indonesian government through Presidential Decree No. 36 of 1990 in the process of resolving cases of children in conflict with the law. This is in accordance with the concept of the State in Indonesia, namely the rule of law that applies proper legal principles and the application of the principle of The Best Interest of the Child to children in line with the concept of the rule of law of Indonesia. The principle of the best interest of the child or the principle of the best interest for children contained in the explanation of the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children which states that the best interest for children is that all decision making must always consider the child's survival and development. The crime of decency that is contradicting the values and norms prevailing in Indonesia continues to occur today. Ironically, even the perpetrator of the crime of decency is a child. The implementation of the handling of children who are perpetrators of crimes of decency by the North Sumatra Regional Police cannot be equated with actions taken by adults. Diversion through the restorative justice approach must be put forward, as referred to in Article 1 number 6 of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The North Sumatra Regional Police as the beginning of the gateway to the process of handling decency crimes committed by children in applying the principle of the best interest of the child does not always run smoothly, there are several obstacles to the police in applying these principles, one of which is that the Police does not have a written standard for application of the principle of the best interest of the child against the child offenders of decency crime. The principle of the best interests of the child has not fully become the main consideration, especially in handling in the police. The application of the principle of the best interests of the child must be proportional. The application of this principle is like the fruit of simalakama, on the one hand it aims to protect and nurture children who are in conflict with the law, but on the other hand there are interests of victims and society that must be protected from the point of view of justice.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION ARRANGEMENTS IN ISLAMIC BUSINESS PRACTICES Sibarani, Fauzi Anshari
Inspiring Law Journal Vol 2, No 2: Juli - Desember
Publisher : Inspiring Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dispute in the Indonesian Dictionary means opposition or conflict. Conflict means opposition or conflict between people, groups, or organizations against one problem object. Conflict or conflict between individuals or groups who have the same relationship or interest in an object of ownership causes legal consequences between each other. Conflict or dispute is a situation and condition when people experience factual disputes or disputes in their perceptions only. In terms of terminology, a dispute is a conflict between two or more parties that originates from differences in perception about an interest or right of choice, resulting in legal consequences for both. In a dispute, the parties can be subject to legal sanctions against one of them. In short, "dispute" is a conflict or conflict as a form of actualization of differences and also a form of conflict between two or more people. A dispute can also be interpreted as a conflict in a social interaction in society that forms an opposition between people, groups, or organizations against a problem object that has not been resolved properly.
Harmonizing Law Enforcement Officials Against Child Victims of Narcotics Abuse Sibarani, Fauzi Anshari; Asmadi, Erwin
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i2.2834

Abstract

Law No. 35/2009 on Narcotics explains that drug abuse is considered a crime without victims. In handling children who are involved in drug cases, the main principle that must be considered is the best interest of the child. This principle is contained in the Juvenile Justice System Law, which emphasizes that every decision must consider the welfare of the child's life and development. The legal protection of children caught up in drug abuse causes the boundaries between perpetrators and victims to become blurred, because according to the law, drug abuse is considered a criminal offense. Therefore, the legal establishment of both the Police, the Prosecutor's Office and the Judiciary needs harmonization so that the application to children who abuse drugs can be put forward, so that children can be given legal certainty in terms of justice. This study is to analyze the harmony of legal confirmation on children as victims of drug abuse. The method used is normative juridical research with a focus on literature study which uses secondary data. The conclusion of the research is that children as victims of narcotics abusers must be given sanctions in the form of rehabilitation, not imposed criminal sanctions because what children do is a crime but without causing victims (crime without victim), harmonization of law enforcement agencies (APH) in cases of children becoming victims of drug abusers must be aligned for the welfare of children.
PROBLEMATIKA KETERANGAN ANAK PENYANDANG DISABILITAS INTELEKTUAL SEBAGAI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN: KAJIAN PSIKOLOGI FORENSIK Sibarani, Fauzi Anshari
Law Jurnal Vol 6, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v6i2.8072

Abstract

Anak yang menjadi saksi tindak pidana yang selanjutnya disebut anak sebagai saksi adalah anak yang belum berumur 18 (delapan belas) tahun yang dapat memberikan keterangan guna kepentingan penyidikan, penuntutan, dan pemeriksaan di sidang pengadilan tentang suatu perkara pidana yang didengar, dilihat, dan/atau dialaminya sendiri. Anak dengan disabilitas intelektual pada dasarnya termasuk golongan pihak yang lemah dan rentan untuk menjadi korban dari tindak pidana kejahatan seksual. Indonesia sebagai negara hukum memiliki kewajiban untuk meninggikan dan menerapkan aturan-aturan hukum agar memberikan perlindungan hukum semaksimal mungkin khususnya terhadap anak-anak dengan disabilitas intelektual agar dapat terhindar dari tindak-tindak kejahatan, terutama dari tindak kejahatan seksual yang tetap banyak terjadi. Terhadap anak yang memiliki disabilitas intelektual, untuk percaya terhadap keterangan anak tentu harus dengan prinsip kehati-hatian aparat penegak hukum, salah satu diantaranya perlu dilakukan pemeriksaan ahli psikologi forensik. Salah satu tugas utama psikolog forensik adalah melakukan wawancara forensik terhadap anak korban secara professional dan non-sugestif, metode ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh keterangan yang akurat tanpa mempengaruhi isi cerita anak.Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur dan menganalisis kekuatan pembuktian keterangan anak korban disabilitas sebagai korban tindak pidana persetubuhan dengan dilakukan assessment oleh psikologi forensik agar penegak hukum mengetahui apakah keterangan anak benar berdasarkan fakta atau berdasarkan cerita halusinasi anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan didukung data empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterangan anak penyandang disabilitas sebagai korban tindak pidana persetubuhan memiliki bobot pembuktian yang sama dengan keterangan korban yang bukan penyandang disabilitas sebagaimana dimaksud pada Pasal 25 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual, namun untuk membuktikan keterangan anak benar atau tidak, dibutuhkan ilmu bantu dalam hukum acara pidana yaitu Ilmu Psikologi Forensik, agar tercapai sebagaimana dalam teori tujuan hukum oleh gustav radbruch yaitu kemanfaatan, kepastian, dan keadilan.
Co-Authors Edy Ikhsan Erwin Asmadi Madiasa Ablisar Marlina Marlina