Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Research Ethics in Publication Parawansah, Rosa Indah; Mukhlis, Imam
Business and Investment Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61292/birev.v1i6.67

Abstract

Moral teaching is the teaching of human good based on the dignity of each person as a human being, and ethics is a branch of philosophy that critically considers which actions are good or bad based on certain moral teachings. On the other hand, research is a series of processes to answer research questions. To determine the readiness of researchers to answer research questions in a sensible and understandable way, research design is crucial. However, publication is the final stage of research, where research results are written and communicated to the public. It has become a very valuable thing for researchers to understand their contribution in particular research. Research methodology, research process, and publication are the three main components of research ethics. Ethics related to research methodologies can include such things as the confidentiality of respondents' data, their desires and expectations to participate in research, and close relationships between researchers and respondents. Ethics relating to research processes also includes issues such as data falsification, fabrication, scientific freedom, integrity and transparency. However, problems related to the publication of research findings may include plagiarism and many submissions.
Performance Analysis of Family Hope Program (PKH) and Their Role in Enhancing Community Welfare: A Case Study in Sumenep District, Madura Parawansah, Rosa Indah; Pratikto, Heri; Syihabudhin, Syihabudhin
International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2025): International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR)
Publisher : Yayasan Riset dan Pengembangan Intelektual

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37385/ijedr.v6i6.8794

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the performance of Family Hope Program (PKH) facilitators in Sumenep District, focusing on three sub-districts: Pragaan, Gili Genting, and Lenteng. The research evaluates facilitator performance based on three key dimensions: quality, quantity, and timeliness in task implementation. A descriptive qualitative approach with a case study method was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving PKH facilitators and Beneficiary Families (KPM). The findings reveal that overall, the facilitators performed their duties effectively. In terms of quality, they successfully established effective communication with KPM and provided assistance in accordance with technical guidelines. Regarding quantity, facilitators met targeted activities such as Family Capacity Building Meetings (P2K2) and periodic data updates. Concerning timeliness, most facilitators demonstrated discipline in submitting daily and monthly reports. However, certain technical challenges, particularly poor internet connectivity in island areas, hindered the reporting process. These results highlight the importance of improving digital infrastructure and providing continuous support for facilitators to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the PKH program, especially in remote regions.