Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Contemplate: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Keislaman Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies Journal of Hadith Studies
Farhan, Rivki Lutfiya
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tuduhan Stephen J. Shoemaker Terhadap al-Qur’an Farhan, Rivki Lutfiya; Muhammad Faisal
CONTEMPLATE: Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Keislaman Vol 4 No 02 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : LP2M Institut Agama Islam Al-Qur'an Al-Ittifaqiah Indralaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53649/contemplate.v4i02.387

Abstract

Para orientalis berusaha memperluas kajian al-Qur’an. Bermula dari mengkaji struktur ayat, penamaan surat, otentisitas, historical critic, di antara orientalis yang melakukan pengkajian melalui historical critic ialah Stephen J. Shoemaker. Tulisan ini akan mendiskusikan perihal keraguan Shoemaker terhadap al-Qur’an, yang berasal dari gugatan Shoemaker yang menganggap banyaknya riwayat rancau dan saling bersebrangan. Berpusat kepada pertanyaan, seperti apa tuduhan Stephen J. Shoemakher mengenai keraguan dalam riwayat kodifikasi al-Qur’an, dan bagaimana pandangan kisah dalam al-Qur’an menurut Stephen J. Shoemakher. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian pustaka dengan menggunakan metode deskripsi-analitis. Dalam artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa kerancauan yang dijumpai Shoemaker dibuktikan dengan banyaknya riwayat-riwayat yang saling bertolak belakang dalam kitab karya Ibn Shabbah, Ibn Sa’d, dan Sayf Ibn ‘Umar. Menurutnya Ibn Shābbah hanya menyebutkan Umar bin Khattāb sebagai promotor pengusung al-Qur’an, tanpa melibatkan Abu Bakar dan Utsmān, Sementara dalam riwayat lain, prosesi pengumpulan al-Qur’an sudah diusulkan di era Abu Bakar, dilanjutkan era ‘Umar, dan Utsmān. Dualitas pemaknaan kata jama’a, menurut Shoemaker menyebabkan kesalahan fatal yang bisa menyebabkan pemahaman yang berbeda, dalam buku Ibn Sa’d dan Sayf Ibn ‘Umar, tidak menyebutkan sama sekali minat ‘Utsmān dalam menetapkan teks al-Qur’an, justru Ubay bin Ka’ab lah yang diutamakan dalam tradisi pengumpulan al-Qur’an, dan membahas tentang penyelesaian perbedaan-perbedaan dari naskah-naskah “pendamping” awal yang sudah beredar, bukan tentang pengumpulan dan pengumuman tentang versi baru otoritatif pada masa Usman bukan ‘Utsmān. Berdasarkan kerancauan riwayat tersebut Shoemaker menganggap bahwa kisah dalam al-Qur’an ialah sebuah kepalsuan, kita tidak mengetahui kebenaran realita yang terjadi pada saat nabi maupun khalifah dengan berdasar pada riwayat yang bersebrangan
Reinterpreting Qur'anic Themes: Muṣṭafa Muslim's Approach to Mauḍū'ī Tafsir Farhan, Rivki Lutfiya; A. Sabiqul Himam; M. Abdul Ghofur
Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies, March
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/al-karim.v2i1.4844

Abstract

This article delves into Muṣṭafa Muslim's method of mauḍū'ī tafsir, emphasizing the process of reinterpreting themes found within the Qur'an. The research methodology employed is library-based, utilizing an analytical framework. It commences with identifying primary sources pertinent to the research focus, particularly literature concerning Qur'anic interpretation, with a specific emphasis on the mauḍū'ī approach. The primary focus lies on Muṣṭafa Muslim's work "Mabāhits fī al-Tafsīr al-Mawdhū'ī." Through this investigation, it is evident that Muṣṭafa Muslim developed three distinct methods for crafting a distinctive mauḍū'ī interpretation. Firstly, he employs a technique to delve into the meanings of specific Qur'anic words. Secondly, he employs a method to identify and analyze themes present within individual Qur'anic surahs. Lastly, he utilizes an approach to explore themes spanning across various surahs in the Qur'an. By examining Muṣṭafa Muslim's approach to understanding and reinterpreting Qur'anic themes within the context of mauḍū'ī tafsir, this article offers valuable insights for researchers and enthusiasts of Qur'anic studies, thereby paving the way for further scholarly exploration in this domain. Contribution: This research enriches the study of mauḍū'ī tafsir by analyzing Muṣṭafa Muslim's method of systematically interpreting Qur'anic themes.
Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Urgensi Ilmu Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl dalam Menilai Kualitas Hadis Farhan, Rivki Lutfiya
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v5i1-03

Abstract

This paper offers a critical review of the article “The Urgency of the Science of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl in Determining the Authenticity of Hadith” by Muh. Haris Zubaidillah, Basyrul Muvid, and Srifariyati. The article underscores the crucial role of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl in evaluating hadith authenticity by examining the reliability and credibility of narrators within the chain of transmission (isnād). The authors argue that this discipline forms a key mechanism in hadith criticism, where both isnād (the chain of narrators) and matn (the textual content) are fundamental components in verifying the validity of a hadith. This review applies a library research method with an analytical approach, focusing on the coherence of arguments and the methodological design presented by the original authors. The review appreciates the authors' consistency in affirming the significance of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl as an essential discipline in hadith studies. It also highlights the necessity for hadith scholars to possess competence in this field to determine the acceptability or rejection of transmitted narrations accurately. Additionally, the review commends the authors’ reflective efforts to respond to skeptical perspectives that challenge the reliability of Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl as a scientific approach. However, it also notes a critical shortcoming: the article does not sufficiently develop a strong and systematic argument to counter orientalist critiques that question the authenticity of hadith. Strengthening this aspect would enhance the article’s academic contribution and its role in contemporary discourse on hadith criticism.
Co-Authors A. Sabiqul Himam Aminuyati Khusna, Ikhda Mar’atul M. Abdul Ghofur Muhammad Faisal Putra, Aldo Marezka