Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian
Ayuningtyas, Fitri
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ROLE OF THE INTELLIGENCE UNIT OF THE INTAN JAYA POLICE IN HANDLING ARMED GROUPS IN THE INTAN JAYA DISTRICT AREA Sigit Prasetyo, Tatag; Soekorini, Noenik; Ayuningtyas, Fitri; Hamdani, Fathul
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i1.554

Abstract

A Police Security Intelligence (Intelkam) acts as the "eyes and ears" in early detection and anticipation of threats to security and public order (Kamtibmas). One of the main challenges faced is the armed criminal group (KKB) in Intan Jaya Regency, Central Papua, which often terrorizes civilians and armed contact with security forces. KKB aims to separate Papua from the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the role and strategy of the Polres Intelkam unit in handling KKB in Intan Jaya. The method used is empirical legal research, which examines facts based on interviews and observations of police actions in dealing with this separatist group. The results showed that Intan Jaya Police implemented a mobilization strategy by working with community, religious and traditional leaders to build social resilience against the influence of separatism. In addition, Intelkam carries out the functions of investigation, security, and mobilization in its operations, both open and closed. In conclusion, the Intan Jaya Police Intelkam strategy plays an important role in creating conducive conditions and stemming the influence of KKB in the community through security and community approaches.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 14 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI PUBLIK Wisanggeni, Dimas; Sidarta, Dudik Djaja; Ayuningtyas, Fitri
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i3.788

Abstract

Law No. 14 of 2008 on Public Information Disclosure (KIP Law) is a vital legal instrument for guaranteeing the public's right to information in order to realise transparent governance. This study examines the legal implementation of the KIP Law, focusing on analysing the implementation of public agencies' obligations and identifying factors that hinder its effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the extent to which the principle of information disclosure has been implemented and to identify legal obstacles in its implementation. This study is an empirical legal study using a qualitative approach. Data was obtained through a study of legislation, legal literature, and interviews with relevant parties at [Name of Public Agency/Research Location]. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive-analytical methods. The results of the study found that the implementation of PUBLIC INFORMATION DISCLOSURE LAW NUMBER 14 OF 2008 has not been fully effective. The main obstacles encountered include: (1) the suboptimal function and role of the Information and Documentation Management Officer (PPID); (2) a strong bureaucratic culture that is resistant to change; and (3) a lack of understanding and commitment from public agency officials in providing information. As a result, the fulfilment of the public's right to information is often hampered. To overcome this, efforts are needed to strengthen the PPID institution, increase human resource capacity, and enforce stricter sanctions for public agencies that do not comply with the provisions of the KIP Law
Pemidanaan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Memiliki Narkotika Golongan I dalam Bentuk Tanaman (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1614/PID.SUS/2025/PT SBY) Imron, Naufal Zaidaan Rahma Putra; Widodo, Ernu; Ayuningtyas, Fitri
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Februari - April
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i1.7037

Abstract

Maraknya peredaran narkotika yang telah merambah seluruh lapisan masyarakat, termasuk generasi muda, menimbulkan ancaman serius bagi keberlangsungan kehidupan bangsa dan negara. Narkotika memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap kondisi fisik dan mental. Dalam konteks medis, penggunaan narkotika dengan dosis tepat dan di bawah pengawasan tenaga kesehatan dapat bermanfaat untuk pengobatan maupun penelitian. Namun, penyalahgunaan yang terjadi di Indonesia menunjukkan penyimpangan dari fungsi tersebut, sehingga menimbulkan dampak negatif yang merugikan individu maupun masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, keberadaan regulasi yang tegas menjadi sangat penting, khususnya melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Penelitian ini membahas dua pokok permasalahan, yaitu pengaturan tindak pidana tanpa hak memiliki Narkotika Golongan I dalam bentuk tanaman menurut UU Narkotika, serta penjatuhan pidana oleh hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 1614/Pid.Sus/2025/PT Sby. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) untuk menelaah penerapan norma hukum dalam praktik peradilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan tanpa hak memiliki Narkotika Golongan I dalam bentuk tanaman diatur secara tegas dalam Pasal 111 ayat (1) UU Narkotika sebagai ketentuan lex specialis terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Unsur deliknya meliputi “setiap orang”, “tanpa hak atau melawan hukum”, serta perbuatan memiliki, menyimpan, atau menguasai narkotika. Dalam putusan a quo, Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya menguatkan pidana penjara 5 tahun dan denda Rp800.000.000,00 karena unsur delik terbukti sah dan meyakinkan. Penjatuhan pidana dinilai telah memenuhi asas legalitas, kepastian hukum, dan proporsionalitas, serta mencerminkan tujuan pemidanaan yang edukatif, preventif, korektif, dan represif.
Curators in Indonesian Corporate Bankruptcy: Duties, Independence, and Implications for Corporate Dissolution Styabudhi, Aldinno Diaz; Borman, Syahrul; Ayuningtyas, Fitri
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/y1jjb170

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal position, duties, independence, and liability of curators in Indonesian corporate bankruptcy, while clarifying their relationship with corporate dissolution. It addresses a recurring normative problem: Law Number 37 of 2004 requires a curator to be independent and free from conflicts of interest, yet it does not provide sufficiently operational indicators for evaluating that independence or for distinguishing professional risk from actionable fault. The study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Primary materials include the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Law and the Limited Liability Company Law, supported by recent legal scholarship on curator duties, supervision, creditor protection, going concern, and professional liability. The analysis shows that a curator is a court-appointed estate administrator whose authority covers asset preservation, claim verification, business continuation when value-enhancing, liquidation, and proportional distribution. A corporate liquidator, however, operates within the dissolution regime and should not be equated automatically with a bankruptcy curator. The article proposes objective safeguards consisting of pre-appointment disclosure, continuing conflict checks, independent valuation, transparent reporting, documented decision-making, effective supervisory review, and a fault-based liability standard balanced by functional protection for good-faith conduct.
Balancing Legal Certainty and Substantive Justice in Indonesian Bankruptcy Law: Simple Proof, Judicial Responsibility, and Curator Accountability Pradipta, Mochammad Deanasti; Soekarini, Noenik; Ayuningtyas, Fitri
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/y0f2hk45

Abstract

Indonesia’s Law Number 37 of 2004 was designed to provide a rapid, simple, and collective mechanism for resolving unpaid debts. Nevertheless, the combination of a low statutory threshold for bankruptcy and the open-textured requirement of “simple proof” continues to generate tension between legal certainty and substantive justice. This article examines how those principles are regulated and applied, and evaluates the responsibilities of commercial judges and curators in protecting creditors and debtors. The study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary materials comprise bankruptcy legislation, judicial-power rules, selected Constitutional Court and Supreme Court materials, and relevant commercial-court reasoning; secondary materials consist mainly of recent peer-reviewed legal scholarship. The analysis finds that certainty is weakened not by the absence of procedural rules, but by the lack of operational standards for disputed debt, maturity, creditor plurality, proportionality, and financial distress. Justice is also vulnerable after adjudication when estate administration is insufficiently transparent or effectively supervised. The article proposes a two-stage judicial screening model, a structured proportionality test, clearer statutory indicators of simple proof, and digital, periodic curator reporting. These reforms would preserve procedural speed while reducing strategic petitions and strengthening balanced protection for all parties.
Co-Authors Borman, Syahrul Ernu Widodo, Ernu Hamdani, Fathul Imron, Naufal Zaidaan Rahma Putra Pradipta, Mochammad Deanasti Sidarta, Dudik Djaja Sigit Prasetyo, Tatag Soekarini, Noenik Soekorini, Noenik Styabudhi, Aldinno Diaz Wisanggeni, Dimas