Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DI INDONESIA DAN NEGARA-NEGARA ASEAN Adinda Apriliany; Yudi Kornelis; Diki Zukriadi
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 5 No. 7 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v5i7.4369

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji, mengevaluasi dan meneliti perbedaan sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) di Indonesia dengan negara-negara ASEAN lainnya. Peradilan tata usaha negara memiliki peran penting dalam menjaga prinsip-prinsip negara hukum dan perlindungan hak-hak warga negara terhadap tindakan administrasi negara. Tujuan utama adalah membandingkan struktur, proses, dan fungsi PTUN untuk mengevaluasi kemampuan mereka dalam menyelesaikan sengketa administrasi. Informasi diperoleh melalui pengumpulan data dari literatur, penelitian hukum, dan interaksi dengan ahli hukum di berbagai negara ASEAN. Temuan studi menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada perbedaan dalam metode hukum yang digunakan, ada prinsip dasar yang sama tentang keadilan administrasi dan perlindungan hak warga negara.
Law Enforcement, Criminal Provisions, and Administrative Sanctions in the Indonesian Legal System Adinda Apriliany; Diki Zukriadi
Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu Vol. 6 No. 01 (2026): Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu, January 2026
Publisher : Sean Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law enforcement is the process of realizing the values of justice, certainty, and benefit in the life of the nation and state. In the context of the Indonesian legal system, law enforcement is not solely oriented towards the imposition of criminal sanctions, but also involves administrative legal instruments that are preventive and corrective in nature. Criminal provisions are used to punish violations that have a serious level of wrongdoing and social impact, while administrative sanctions are used to enforce compliance without going through lengthy criminal court proceedings. This article analyzes the relationship, differences, and application of criminal and administrative sanctions in the Indonesian legal system, as well as examining how these two instruments play a role in achieving effective law enforcement. The research method used is normative juridical with a regulatory approach and legal doctrine analysis. The results show that the effectiveness of law enforcement in Indonesia is highly dependent on the balance between repressive (enforcement) and preventive (prevention) efforts, as well as coordination between legal institutions that apply the principles of substantive and procedural justice.