Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Hasanuddin Law Review
Park, Jihyun
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Examining Personal Data Protection Law of Indonesia and South Korea: The Privacy Rights Fulfilment Shahrullah, Rina Shahriyani; Park, Jihyun; Irwansyah, Irwansyah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i1.5016

Abstract

Personal data leakages have been experienced by both Indonesia and South Korea. To ensure the protection of privacy rights relating to personal data, both countries have promulgated special laws, namely the Indonesian Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) and the South Korean Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). This study aims to compare the two laws to ascertain their similarities and differences by adopting a comparative law approach. The study found that similarities exist in the two laws. They are to protect personal data and confer rights on data subjects. In the absence of explicit consent given by data subjects, data controllers and processors are prohibited from collecting and processing the data with some exceptions. They also mandate a special institution that is tasked to investigate and sanction data controllers and processors when they conduct data infringement. There are inherent differences in the two laws. PIPA is designed to be the framework legislation and PDP is designed to be a special statute. Additionally, PIPA mandates the institution dealing with personal data protection without referring to any other law but the Act itself.  PDP Law clearly states that further provisions relating to this institution will be governed by Presidential Regulation.
Evaluating Data Breach Notification Protocols: Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and South Korea Situmeang, Ampuan; Park, Jihyun; Sudirman, Lu; Silviani, Ninne Zahara; Agustini, Shenti
Lentera Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v12i1.47621

Abstract

Data protection is one of the most important aspects of the digital economy, with its legal implications extending across digital landscapes. The failure to protect data in data breaches can threaten the interests of owners and expose them to various risks. Legal compliance regarding how owners are notified of data breaches is important to prevent this, necessitating deep legal discourse and analysis. Using a comparative legal research method with a statutory approach, this study dissects norms within Indonesia and South Korea’s legal systems to analyze their differences in legal compliance regarding this issue. The findings of this study highlight the discrepancies in legal frameworks between Indonesia and South Korea. It particularly notes Indonesia's lack of a governing body for data breach notifications and the absence of comprehensive privacy impact assessments or cybersecurity compliance. Ultimately, the study underscores the need for Indonesia to develop a normative model for data protection to address its significant regulatory gaps—contrasting with South Korea's more robust legal mechanisms and the GDPR's systematic oversight.KEYWORDS: Data Breach, Data Breach Notification, Data Protection.
Examining Personal Data Protection Law of Indonesia and South Korea: The Privacy Rights Fulfilment Shahrullah, Rina Shahriyani; Park, Jihyun; Irwansyah, Irwansyah
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v10i1.5016

Abstract

Personal data leakages have been experienced by both Indonesia and South Korea. To ensure the protection of privacy rights relating to personal data, both countries have promulgated special laws, namely the Indonesian Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law) and the South Korean Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). This study aims to compare the two laws to ascertain their similarities and differences by adopting a comparative law approach. The study found that similarities exist in the two laws. They are to protect personal data and confer rights on data subjects. In the absence of explicit consent given by data subjects, data controllers and processors are prohibited from collecting and processing the data with some exceptions. They also mandate a special institution that is tasked to investigate and sanction data controllers and processors when they conduct data infringement. There are inherent differences in the two laws. PIPA is designed to be the framework legislation and PDP is designed to be a special statute. Additionally, PIPA mandates the institution dealing with personal data protection without referring to any other law but the Act itself.  PDP Law clearly states that further provisions relating to this institution will be governed by Presidential Regulation.
Co-Authors Agustini, Shenti Irwansyah Irwansyah Lu Sudirman Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah Silviani, Ninne Zahara Situmeang, Ampuan