Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Antisipasi Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Berkaitan Dengan Profesi Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Elrika, Elrika; Djaja, Benny
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2044

Abstract

The mode of Money Laundering Crime (TPPU) that often occurs in Indonesia is by utilizing the role of Notary and PPAT in performing their duties. Notaries and Land Deed Officials ("PPAT") become co-suspects in criminal cases, because they are suspected of assisting in the implementation of money laundering crimes, or other criminal acts involving deeds made. The research method used in writing this article is normative juridical research with a research approach using statutory regulations and using a theoretical or conceptual approach. The results of the analysis of the Notary and PPAT in carrying out their duties to anticipate money laundering apply the principle of Recognizing Service Users, if the Notary or PPAT finds suspicious transactions, they can report it to the Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Center (PPATK). In addition, Notary and PPAT are not responsible for the criminal act of money laundering committed by the parties or their clients who use the services of Notary or PPAT who require their services based on their authority. The position of the Notary and PPAT in exercising their authority to make authentic deeds is only as a recorder that is poured into a deed that gives rise to legal acts and has perfect evidentiary power. Notaries and PPAT are only obliged to report to PPATK if there are indications of money laundering committed by the parties or their clients through their services as Notaries or PPAT.
Analysis of Regulations Regarding Interfaith Marriages According to a Religious Perspective, Marriage Law and Decision No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/Pn.Sby Elrika, Elrika; Sudirman, Maman; Djaja, Benny
JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Vol 6, No 4 (2024): JIHAD : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58258/jihad.v6i4.7583

Abstract

Marriage in Indonesia is carried out by obtaining legal recognition from religion and the state. The Marriage Law stipulates that a legal marriage must follow the religious beliefs that are believed in. In Indonesia, the practice of interfaith marriage that is not allowed is Islam and Hinduism, while Catholicism and Protestantism, Buddhism and Confucianism are four religions that allow marriage with different religions. The Compilation of Islamic Law and SEMA dated January 30, 2019 number 231/ PAN/HK.0  1/2019 also regulates not recognizing interfaith marriages so that such marriages cannot be registered. However, Court Decision No. 916/Pdt.P 2022 /PN.Sby granted the applicants' request to legalize and register and record the marriage of the parties. Thus, for the parties who are married of different religions in the case. Have a valid marriage before the law and the state for interfaith marriages. However, in 2023, SEMA Number 2 of 2023 was issued on July 17, 2023 concerning Instructions for Judges in Adjudicating Cases of Applications for Marriage between People of Different Religions and Beliefs, which are prohibited from being granted by the court.