Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas Di Asean Indonesia-Malaysia Meher, Montayana; Rafiqi; Nasution, Shulhan Iqbal; Nasution, Alvin Hamzah
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v11i1.11993

Abstract

This research aims to find out how international trade agreements are basically used by countries and producers to eliminate or reduce barriers in countries with consumers and markets. However, this condition is used as an excuse for free trade that does not comply with proper trading rules and patterns. The research method used is normative juridical research. The nature of this research is descriptive, namely research that analyzes legal regulations related to the Free Trade Agreement in ASEAN between Indonesia and Malaysia. The analysis was carried out qualitatively. The research results show that cooperation and economic integration among member countries has great potential to encourage economic growth and expand trade opportunities. Although there are still several obstacles that need to be overcome, such as internal and external factors that influence the competitiveness of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), the steps taken by ASEAN in terms of exemption from import duties through CEPT are one of the efforts to increase integration regional economy. Addressing internal factors that influence innovation and productivity, and integrating MSMEs in regional or global production chains will be key to maximizing trade potential and economic growth among ASEAN countries, including Indonesia and Malaysia. And the need to understand the dynamics of global trade, international economic policy, and changes in regional trade patterns
Criminal Policy as an Instrument for Controlling Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice Nasution, Shulhan Iqbal
Rechtsvinding Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i1.810

Abstract

Criminal policy in Indonesia plays an important role in crime control efforts, but the dominant approach, namely retributive, has not been able to resolve the roots of social problems and restore victims' rights comprehensively. The research method used is normative juridical or library research, by analyzing library materials or secondary data that are relevant to the topic. This research is descriptive analytical, namely the data obtained and processed and analyzed to provide a comprehensive picture of criminal policy functioning as an instrument for controlling criminal acts based on restorative justice with data collection methods through document studies and interviews. Research Results Show that Criminal Policy in Indonesia has not been able to resolve the root of social problems and restore victims' rights comprehensively. Therefore, a more humanistic and participatory policy reformulation is needed through a restorative justice approach. Restorative justice offers a resolution mechanism that actively involves perpetrators, victims, and the community with the main goal of recovery and reconciliation. Although its implementation has begun through a number of internal policies of law enforcement institutions, its implementation still faces structural and normative challenges. Optimizing this approach requires strengthening regulations, increasing the capacity of officers, and shifting the legal culture from an orientation towards revenge towards just social recovery
Criminal liability for banking crime perpetrators who make false records of customer deposits (decision study number: 2644/ Pid.B /2021/PN Mdn) Silaban, Yusuf Gideon; Nasution, Shulhan Iqbal
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i9.666

Abstract

The security of customer funds in banks is often problematic due to the actions of bank employees themselves, where bank employees directly involved with customer funds commit acts of embezzlement in their positions by embezzling customer funds. The problem formulated in this study is as follows: What are the legal regulations regarding Banking Crimes that make false records of Customer Deposit Funds according to the applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia? and What are the legal considerations of the Judge at the Medan District Court in imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators of the crime of false records Case Number: 2644 / Pid.B / 2021 / PN Mdn? This study aims to discuss the criminal liability of perpetrators of false record crimes. The type of research used in this study uses normative legal research. The data collection techniques used are library research and field research. The data analysis conducted in this study was qualitative. The results of the study found that criminal liability for bank employees who commit the crime of false recording can be punished using the provisions of Article 49, paragraph (1) of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking. The provisions of Article 49 of the Banking Law contain legal certainty because this article has been specifically designed for the crime of false recording, and the provisions of the Article expressly regulate the prohibition of false recording and provide threats of criminal sanctions for violators. The results of the analysis of Decision Number: 2644 / Pid.B / 2021 / PN Mdn concluded that the criminal sentence imposed on the Defendant by the Medan District Court was 5 (five) years in prison and a fine of IDR 10,000,000,000.00 (ten billion rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with charges for 4 (four) months. According to the author, this sentence contains the principle of law enforcement and is in accordance with the provisions of Article 49 of the Banking Law.
MENS REA: FONDASI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Shulhan Iqbal Nasution
Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/iqtishaduna.v7i1.61542

Abstract

Abstrak Mens rea yakni kondisi batin seorang pelaku, merupakan elemen esensial dalam hukum pidana yang berfungsi menentukan apakah seseorang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara pidana. Dalam konteks sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia, mens rea diposisikan sebagai prasyarat utama untuk membuktikan adanya kesalahan (schuld) yang melekat pada suatu tindak pidana. Tulisan ini membahas peran penting mens rea dalam hukum pidana nasional, keterkaitannya dengan asas geen straf zonder schuld, serta problematika penerapannya dalam tindak pidana formil maupun yang diatur melalui undang-undang khusus. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekana perundang-undangan.  Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum pidana modern mengakui prinsip strict liability dan vicarious liability, keberadaan mens rea tetap diperlukan sebagai pilar utama dalam menyeimbangkan kepastian hukum, efektivitas penegakan hukum, dan perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia. Kata Kunci: Mens Rea, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Peradilan Pidana   Abstract Mens rea, or the mental state of a perpetrator, is an essential element in criminal law that serves to determine whether a person can be held criminally responsible. In the context of the Indonesian criminal justice system, mens rea is positioned as a key prerequisite for proving guilt (schuld) attached to a criminal act. This paper discusses the important role of mens rea in national criminal law, its relationship with the principle of geen straf zonder schuld, and the problems of its application in formal criminal acts and those regulated by special laws. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative approach. The results of the study show that modern criminal law recognises the principles of strict liability and vicarious liability, but mens rea remains necessary as a key pillar in balancing legal certainty, effective law enforcement, and the protection of human rights. Keywords: Mens Rea, Criminal Liability, Criminal Justice
Criminal Policy About Vigilantism Against Suspected Criminals Nasution, Shulhan Iqbal
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5061

Abstract

Tindakan main hakim sendiri terhadap terduga pelaku tindak pidana merupakan fenomena di Provinsi Sumatera Utara yang melanggar berbagai nilai Pancasila, berbagai asas, berbagai ketentuan pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, dan juga ketertiban umum. Tindakan main hakim sendiri terhadap terduga pelaku tindak pidana merupakan tindak pidana kekerasan yang merupakan masalah sosial, yang harus dicegah dan ditanggulangi melalui kebijakan kriminal. Penelitian ini mengkaji kebijakan kriminal terkini mengenai tindakan main hakim sendiri terhadap terduga pelaku tindak pidana. Sehubungan dengan itu, penelitian ini menggunakan Teori Kebijakan Kriminal, difokuskan untuk mengkaji kebijakan kriminal terkini mengenai tindakan main hakim sendiri terhadap terduga pelaku tindak pidana. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian normatif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat analisis preskriptif, dengan menggunakan berbagai jenis data dalam penelitian hukum. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa kebijakan kriminal terkini mengenai tindakan main hakim sendiri terhadap terduga pelaku tindak pidana dapat ditegaskan dengan ketentuan Pasal 170 jo Pasal 351 KUHP. Kebijakan kriminal saat ini mengenai tindakan main hakim sendiri terhadap tersangka pelaku tindak pidana kejahatan nonpenal, dapat diperkuat dengan adanya himbauan dari Pemerintah melalui Kepolisian, khususnya melalui Kepolisian di Provinsi Sumatera Utara .