Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Hikayat Raja Pasai Sebagai Sumber Historiografi Menurut Perspektif Syed M. Naquib Al-Attas Wilandra, Syaidina Sapta
TSAQAFAH Vol. 19 No. 2 (2023): Tsaqafah Jurnal Peradaban Islam
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v19i2.9185

Abstract

Hikayat Raja Pasai (The Chronicles of Pasai) is considered one of the oldest texts that tells about Islamization in the Malay-Indonesian region. According to other traditional historiography, this hikayat by Western scholars is often regarded as a story full of myths and very subjective so its credibility is judged to be reduced, even considered as a mere fantasy story. This opinion was rejected by Syed M. Naquib Al-Attas. According to him, the results of the interpretation of Western scholars were due to their biased worldview, so they built a secular historical research methodology. As a result, they consider traditional historical works such as Hikayat Raja Pasai to be only literary works. That's why Al-Attas then tried to re-interpretation the Hikayat Raja Pasai which is the oldest historiographical work that explains the process of Islamization in the Malay-Indonesian Archipelago. Among the results of his interpretation of this hikayat is that the name Samudra comes from the word semutraya, the process of Islamization mentioned in the hikayat has been going on since the 9th or 10th century AD and was brought by the Quraysh Arabs from Mengiri, Merah Silu is a fictional character, and Malik as-Saleh was not the first Muslim king from Samudra Pasai.
Dari Modernisme ke Salafisme: Transformasi Pemikiran tentang Islam dan Demokrasi di Indonesia Wilandra, Syaidina Sapta
Politea : Jurnal Pemikiran Politik Islam Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Politea : Jurnal Pemikiran Politik Islam
Publisher : State Islamic Institute of Kudus (IAIN Kudus)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/politea.v7i1.25149

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa bagaimana kalangan umat Islam di Indonesia merespon penerapan sistem demokrasi dari masa awal kemerdekaan hingga masa reformasi. Penelitian menggunakan metode sejarah dengan tahapan heuristik, verifikasi, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Dari hasil penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa di masa awal kemerdekaan secara umum para tokoh Islam di Indonesia menyepakati penerapan sistem demokrasi dengan catatan bahwa dasar negara haruslah berdasarkan Islam. Namun di masa Orde Baru muncul generasi baru yang berpaham Salafi yang secara lugas justru menolak sistem demokrasi dan menganggapnya bertentangan dengan Islam. Padahal generasi baru yang berpaham Salafi ini pun lahir dari organisasi Islam modernis, yang di masa awal kemerdekaan itu menerima dan memperjuangkan demokrasi di Indonesia. Hal ini menunjukkan adanya perubahan dan keberagamaan dari kalangan umat Islam, khususnya beberapa kelompok Islam modernis, dalam merespon dan memaknai ajaran Islam dalam kaitannya dengan pemikiran politik.
Is Communism Incompatible with Religion?: Islam and Communism in Haji Misbach's Thoughts (1914-1926) Wilandra, Syaidina Sapta
NALAR Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Islam in Indonesia
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin, Adab, and Da'wah, State Islamic University of Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/njppi.v8i1.7829

Abstract

The article aims to explore Haji Misbach's thoughts in his writings in Medan Moeslimin newspaper regarding the harmony of communism with Islamic teachings. The study in this article uses the historical method with the stages of heuristic, source criticism, interpretation, and historiography. The primary data sources are Medan Moeslimin newspaper and various relevant archives. The data obtained is then analyzed using an intellectual history approach. This study found that when it was present in the Hindia Belanda, communism faced various other thoughts, including Islam. The communist movement at that time tried to penetrate through Sarekat Islam and made Islam the basis of its movement. At that time Haji Misbach, who was one of the Sarekat Islam figures, supported communism and saw Islam as a unity in the ideology of communism. His view differed significantly from communist figures in the West who saw religion negatively. In his writings, Haji Misbach presented communism as an analytical tool to criticize capitalism and colonialism. However, at the same time Haji Misbach also never discussed philosophically or theologically how the concept of materialism in the ideology of communism worked. Therefore, in the normative and theological realms, Misbach still believed in the truth and relevance of Islamic teachings for people's lives. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that Haji Misbach did not merely equalize or harmonize Islam with communism but also had differences in the interpretation of the ideology of communism to suit his religious life as a Muslim.
KONTINUITAS PEMIKIRAN TOKOH ISLAM TENTANG ISLAM DAN PANCASILA SEBAGAI DASAR NEGARA Wilandra, Syaidina Sapta
Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Juli 2024
Publisher : IAIN Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/zjpi.v10i1.8860

Abstract

Artikel ini akan membahas mengenai sejarah pemikiran para tokoh Islam mengenai dasar negara Indonesia sejak pra-proklamasi hingga tahun 1959. Dengan menggunakan metode sejarah dan pendekatan sejarah pemikiran, penelitian ini berusaha menjawab bagaimana para tokoh Islam di masa itu memaknai Pancasila sebagai dasar negara. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa para tokoh Islam yang terlibat dalam pendirian negara memaknai Pancasila dengan perspektif Islam sehingga tidak ada pertentangan antar keduanya. Gagasan para tokoh Islam mengenai Islam dan dasar negara ini dapat ditelusuri dari pemikiran mereka mengenai kebangsaan pada masa kolonial Hindia Belanda. Pada masa tersebut, perdebatan seputar dasar negara pun telah terjadi antar golongan nasionalis Islam, nasionalis sekular, dan komunis. Hal yang sama juga terjadi pada masa pasca kemerdekaan, tepatnya di forum Majelis Konstituante. Saat itu bahkan sempat keluar kritik dan penolakan terhadap Pancasila sebagai dasar negara yang oleh beberapa tokoh dari golongan Islam, akan tetapi kritik dan penolakan tersebut lebih dilatarbelakangi akibat dimonopolinya tafsir Pancasila oleh golongan sekular dan komunis. Pada akhirnya pun para tokoh dari golongan Islam dapat menerima Pancasila kembali dengan perspektif keislaman mereka.