Riyanto, F. X. Eko Armada
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Metafisika Eksistensial menurut Martin Heidegger: Model Manusia Altruistik di Tengah Nihilisme Kehidupan Bermasyarakat Indonesia: Existential Metaphysics according to Martin Heidegger: Altruistic Human Model amidst the Nihilism of Indonesian Social Life Pitang, Simon Pedro; Riyanto, F. X. Eko Armada; Adon, Mathias Jebaru
Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jfi.v7i2.71030

Abstract

The focus of the research lies on exploring the meaning of human existence amidst the nihilism of life through metaphysical-philosophical reflection according to Martin Heidegger's thought. For Heidegger, humans are being-with-other; human cannot be separated from other humans in the world. Heidegger proposes how being-with-other always has a nature based on sorge or care for others in everydayness. On the other hand, humans are influenced by nihilism or live in the meaninglessness that the world offers today. Humans are increasingly showing a life of complete disregard for the world and other humans which then creates selfishness in themselves. Therefore, exploring the meaning of human existence according to Heidegger's thought will find an altruistic attitude that humans can internalize and also bring meaningful life in the midst of nihilism. The method used in the research is qualitative method through literature study. This research found that Heidegger's concept of sorge or care interprets human life as being-with-others. The contribution of this research is to awaken human altruism as being-with-other and create a meaningful life through caring for others.
Mengulas Relasi Mayoritas dan Minoritas dalam Kehidupan Beragama di Indonesia Menurut Filsafat Wajah Emmanuel Levinas Jugan, Wenseslaus; Pandor, Pius; Riyanto, F. X. Eko Armada; Amabugis, Heribertus; Santos, Charolus G. D.
Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Vol 8 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/kamaya.v8i1.3779

Abstract

The main focus of this research is to understand and examine the relationship between majority and minority groups in religious life in Indonesia. The author uses Levinas' philosophy of the face as a kind of analytical tool to explore and delve into this issue. The purpose of this paper is to reconstruct the relationship between majority and minority groups in Indonesia’s religious life through Levinas' thoughts, so that society can better understand religious coexistence amidst existing pluralism. The methodology used in this paper is library research. This paper finds that Emmanuel Levinas' concept of the philosophy of the face emphasizes the importance of the presence of “the Other” in human relationships. In Indonesia's religious life, this thought contributes to addressing the phenomenon of majority-minority relations that lead to radicalism, identity politics, terrorism, and the reduction of the presence of others, by stressing ethical responsibility in overcoming power relations. The philosophy of the face opens opportunities for humanistic dialogue, encourages respect for the Other, and fosters a harmonious religious life. Dialogue with people of different religions will increasingly enable individuals to better embrace pluralism. Moreover, its implementation in the Indonesian context does face challenges. Therefore, the thoughts of Hannah Arendt and Martin Buber can assist society in building a more inclusive and harmonious majority-minority relationship. In conclusion, Levinas' philosophy of the face serves as an inspiration to encourage ethical awareness, dialogue, and respect for “the Other” in Indonesia’s pluralistic society. This effort must also be supported by interdisciplinary approaches, incorporating thoughts from other philosophers and utilizing other sciences to address majority-minority issues in Indonesia.
Tinjauan Kehidupan Suku Dayak di Rumah Betang dalam Perspektif Filsafat Relasionalitas menurut Armada Riyanto Sakaria, Oswald Agurinsa; Riyanto, F. X. Eko Armada; Adon, Mathias Jebaru
Jurnal Adat dan Budaya Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jabi.v7i1.89122

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis kehidupan suku Dayak di Rumah Betang melalui filsafat relasionalitas Armada Riyanto. Rumah Betang merupakan rumah adat suku Dayak yang tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai tempat tinggal secara fisik, namun juga menjadi ruang yang mencerminkan nilai-nilai relasionalitas. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rumah Betang bukan hanya sebagai tempat tinggal fisik masyarakat suku Dayak, namun menjadi ruang terbentuknya hubungan relasional. Masyarakat suku Dayak di dalam rumah Betang saling berelasi, berkomunikasi dan berinteraksi. Konsep “Aku” merujuk pada kesadaran diri sebagai makhluk relasional, sedangkan “Liyan” merujuk pada sesama, alam, dan Yang Ilahi. Kehidupan di dalam rumah Betang menggambarkan relasi intersubjektif yang setara dan inklusif membangun hubungan sosial yang harmoni. Masyarakat di dalamnya saling bekerja sama dan menunjukkan ketergantungan satu sama lain. Studi ini juga menemukan bahwa rumah Betang menjadi simbol persatuan dan persaudaraan menjadi ruang terbentuknya aspek relasionalitas dalam kehidupan suku Dayak. Rumah Betang sebagai ruang kultural-etis menjadi tempat terciptanya kearifan lokal yang tercermin dalam sikap menghormati dan mencintai sesama, Alam dan Yang Ilahi. Rumah ini juga menjadi ruang lifeworld, yakni ruang pengalaman hidup masyarakat suku Dayak secara subjektif dan objektif. Subjektivitasnya terlihat dalam interaksi sosial di antara penghuninya dan objektivitasnya terlihat dalam struktur bangunan yang mencerminkan rasa hormat pada Alam. Dengan demikian, rumah betang tidak hanya menjadi simbol persatuan dan identitas budaya suku Dayak, namun juga menjadi ruang yang mencerminkan nilai-nilai relasionalitas antara “Aku” dengan Liyan, Alam dan Tuhan.
INTERSUBJEKTIVITAS WAJAH DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB HUMANITER: MENYIKAPI AMORALITAS PERANG Pitang, Simon Pedro; Riyanto, F. X. Eko Armada; Adon, Mathias Jebaru
Sanjiwani: Jurnal Filsafat Vol 16 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The research focuses on exploring the meaning of Emanuel Levinas' ethics of face in illuminating the immorality that occurs in war. For Levinas, humans are "being-for-the-other"; beings who exist in the world for others. Levinas proposes how "being-for-the-other" always has the nature to be responsible for the presence of other humans with sorge (care). On the other hand, humans often become power-hungry "animals", which can only be obtained if they conquer others, especially in this case, is war. Humans are increasingly showing a life of utter disregard for other human beings by constantly waging war. Therefore, exploring facial ethics and humanitarian responsibility according to Levinas' thought will find intersubjective attitudes that humans can internalize to realize other humans as existences who also have experiences and feelings, are valuable and precious. The method used in the research is qualitative method through literature study. This research found that face ethics gives intersubjective understanding to every human being. The contribution of this research is to understand that war is immorality; which is the destructiveness of humanity that violates the principles of intersubjectivity and humanitarian responsibility.