Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH PENELITIAN MAHASISWA Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara
Bintang Raharja Pangestu
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
STRATEGI MEDIATOR DALAM MENCAPAI PERDAMAIAN PADA SENGKETA WARIS (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 1572/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Ngw) Bintang Raharja Pangestu; Abdullah Afif
JURNAL ILMIAH PENELITIAN MAHASISWA Vol 2 No 4 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Kampus Akademik Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jipm.v2i4.362

Abstract

This research is motivated by the author's curiosity about how the performance of a mediator judge in the Religious Court in handling inheritance dispute cases, where inheritance dispute cases are family problems that are arguably quite complicated, because they involve property in the form of money, land, vehicles and houses. So the inheritance dispute needs to be resolved with the mediator as the mediator of the problem, so that peace can be achieved.The purpose of the research is to analyze how the steps taken by the mediator judge in Case Number 1572/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Ngw and what are the success factors of the mediator so that peace is achieved in the inheritance dispute case. This research uses qualitative research with a normative approach. The data collection techniques used are documentation and interviews. Then the data that has been collected is analyzed using descriptive analysis method.Based on the results of the analysis that researchers conducted interviews with mediator judges at the Ngawi Religious Court in the case of inheritance dispute Number 1572/Pdt.G/2022/Pa.Ngw. That the steps of the mediator judge in carrying out mediation are still carried out in accordance with the applicable provisions in PERMA No. 1 of 2016. At the beginning of the mediator judge's meeting with the parties, both the plaintiff and the defendant, the mediator must be able to foster a sense of trust in the parties to the dispute, which is the main capital in the mediation step. The division of inheritance is carried out on the basis of mutual agreement of the parties, but before that the mediator conveys in advance the share that will be obtained according to faraidh law. Then there are several factors that become the capital for achieving peace, namely internal and external factors. Internal factors are seen from the parties to the dispute, good faith and wholehearted willingness to be willing to be mediated. External factors are seen from the skills of a mediator who can determine the success of mediation.
PRINSIP, KARAKTERISTIK DAN MACAM-MACAM PROFESI HUKUM ERA DIGITALISASI Bintang Raharja Pangestu; Rizka Amalia; Abdurrahman Abdurrahman; M. Muzakki
JURNAL ILMIAH NUSANTARA Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jinu.v1i4.1682

Abstract

In this current era, digitalization of law is very much needed. In the digital era, more sophisticated technology will replace everything that is technological. Currently, artificial intelligence machines have a higher level of accuracy and legal certainty compared to the capabilities of the human legal profession. In the industrial revolution 4.0 phase, digital advances are changing the paradigm and way people practice law, people do not need to consult a law office, because artificial intelligence machines provide answers to various legal problems. In fact, law firms, courts, police and prosecutors will also increasingly depend on artificial intelligence machines.The performance of artificial intelligence machines has been proven to be faster and more accurate than human legal professions in identifying and analyzing legal problems. Of course, that doesn't mean it can immediately replace all the roles of the human legal profession. Intelligence machines are limited to providing legal certainty, while in certain legal cases there is a struggle between certainty, expediency and justice. Justice is not a matter of algorithms, but rather of conscience, sensitivity to human values, and a critical perspective on reality. Strictly speaking, to bring the law closer to justice, the legal profession requires human beings who have integrity and have an intelligent conscience.
Co-Authors Abdullah Afif Abdurrahman Abdurrahman M. Muzakki Rizka Amalia