Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Hukum Malahayati
Sadjeli, Siti Soraya
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Efektivitas Status Otonomi Khusus di Provinsi Papua Guna Mencegah Konflik Kekerasan Ditinjau Dari Hukum Masyarakat & Good Governance Gultom, Jhessica Hawana; Ahmad Habibie, Dieva Ahmad; Sadjeli, Siti Soraya; Putri, Amelia; Putri, Kirana Ardhelia; Mulyadi, Mulyadi
Jurnal Hukum Malahayati Vol 4, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Malayati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dengan disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua, berbagai isu politik, tindak kekerasan, dan gangguan keamanan di Papua yang berupaya melepaskan diri dari Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia dengan sigap disikapi melalui kebijakan politik dan hukum sebagai upaya mempertahankan NKRI. Sebagai paradigma tentang bagaimana pemerintah harus beroperasi, Undang-Undang Otonomi Khusus dibuat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi dampak otonomi khusus di Papua dan efektivitas kebijakan otonomi khusus pemerintah. Hukum normatif yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berasal dari buku, jurnal, artikel, dan sumber-sumber ilmu hukum lainnya serta teknik studi kepustakaan. Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa karena pemerintah pusat ingin membangun Papua seperti daerah lainnya, maka status hukum otonomi khusus bagi Provinsi Papua ditetapkan, khususnya dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua.
The Position Of Proof Of Suspicion In Determining The Status Of Out-Of-Wedlock Children As Biological Children Sadjeli, Siti Soraya; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 2 (2025): Volume 11, Nomor 2 April-June 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i2.12085

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to examine the position of evidence of suspicion as stipulated in Article 1915  of the Civil Code, especially proof to determine the status of out-of-wedlock children as biological children in civil procedure law, and to explore the extent to which the legal system provides protection for the civil rights of out-of-wedlock children who are determined as biological children without a DNA test. The type of research used is normative juridical which is descriptive-analytical, using a legislative approach and a case approach, with data collection techniques through literature studies, and processing qualitatively analyzed data. The results of the study show that evidence of suspicion is legal according to the law and can be used as a basis for judge's consideration if it is supported by the facts. A civil relationship between a child and a biological father can be recognized without a DNA test, simply with other evidence such as communications, witnesses, or indirect confessions at trial. This ensures the child's access to custody, identity, education, inheritance, and alimony. The state plays a role in protecting the rights of children out of wedlock in an inclusive manner and eliminating birth status discrimination. Suspect evidence needs to be strengthened as an alternative to proof if a DNA test is not carried out. The judge is expected to assess indirect facts wisely for the best interests of the child. Regulation, socialization, and training of law enforcement are needed to ensure that proof without DNA tests guarantees the protection of the civil rights of out-of-wedlock children. Keywords: Evidence of Suspicion, Status of Out-of-wedlock Children, Civil Procedure Law, Civil Rights.
Dilema Hukum Dalam Pengangkatan Anak Oleh Pekerja Migran Indonesia Di Malaysia Habibie, Dieva Ahmad; Sadjeli, Siti Soraya; Gabriella, Theresia; Rasyed, Muhammad Al; Saarah, Arini; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti
Jurnal EL-QANUNIY: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 10, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-qanuniy.v10i2.13900

Abstract

This study examines the differences in child adoption regulations between Indonesia and Malaysia, and their impact on the legal protection of children adopted by Indonesian migrant workers in Malaysia. Employing a socio-legal approach, this study analyzes the regulations in both countries as well as relevant literature on child protection and international migration. The findings reveal that discrepancies in regulations, particularly regarding adoption procedures and recognition of citizenship, result in legal uncertainties for adopted children. These children often face difficulties in obtaining birth certificates, legal identity, and access to basic rights such as education and health. This study highlights the importance of harmonizing regulations between the two countries and strengthening international cooperation to protect the rights of children adopted by migrant workers. The practical implications of this research include the need for more comprehensive policies to protect cross-border children and to raise public awareness of the importance of child protection.
Co-Authors Ahmad Habibie, Dieva Ahmad Gabriella, Theresia Gultom, Jhessica Hawana Habibie, Dieva Ahmad Mulyadi Mulyadi Putri, Amelia Putri, Kirana Ardhelia Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Rasyed, Muhammad Al Saarah, Arini