Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan ENLEKTURER: Journal of Islamic Studies SASI Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Tasrizal
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Peradilan Adat Gampong: Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Samudera Aceh Utara Tasrizal; Muksalmina
ENLEKTURER: Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Enlecturer: Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Enlightenment Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71036/ejis.v1i2.168

Abstract

Dengan adanya Qanun Nomor 9 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pembinaan Kehidupan Adat dan Adat Istidat, dan qanun Nomor 10 Tahun 2008 Tentang Lembaga Adat, gampong telah diberi kewenangan untuk menyelesaikan beberapa sengketa dalam masyarakatnya, sebagaimana dimaksudkan dalam pasal 13 (1) qanun Nomor 9 Tahun 2008. Sesuai qanun Nomor 10 Tahun 2008, maka penyelesaian sengketa dilakukan oleh perangkat gampong yang terdiri dari; keuchik, tuha peut, dan imeum meunasah. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa pada peradilan adat gampong di Kecamatan Samudera dan kendala yang dihadapi dalam penyelesaian sengketa pada peradilan adat gampong di Kecamatan Samudera serta mengkaji upaya mengatasi masalah yang dihadapi peradilan adat gampong dalam penyelesaian sengketa di Kecamatan Samudera. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan sifat penelitian analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan oleh lembaga peradilan adat gampong di Kecamatan Samudera memiliki prosedur dan konsep tersendiri yang berbeda dengan konsep resolusi konflik lainnya. Konsep penyelesaian sengketa dilakukan berdasarkan hasil musyawarah, sehingga putusannya bukan kalah-menang, tetapi damai dan sama-sama menang. Kendala yang dihadapi oleh peradilan adat gampong diantaranya; administrasi tidak lengkap, para penegak hukum yang tidak mengerti regulasi, adanya pengaruh pluralisme hukum yang berlaku dalam masyarakat, minimnya kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap pelaku peradilan adat, kurangnya kesadaran masyarakat dan keadilan hukum terhadap putusan peradilan adat. Upaya yang telah dilakukan oleh lembaga adat di Kecamatan Samudera untuk melahirkan kepastian hukum diantaranya; peradilan adat dijalankan oleh orang-orang yang di pandang memahami adat dan hukum dalam masyarakat atau yang memiliki profesi; dalam pelaksanaan putusan, peradilan adat melengkapi segala administrasi agar tidak menimbulkan sengketa di kemudian hari; para pelaksana peradilan adat gampong juga menjaga independensinya dalam menyelesaikan setiap sengketa. Dengan demikian perlu adanya sosialisasi kepada masyarakat terkait regulasi sehingga masyarkat mengerti sejauh mana kewenangan peradilan adat dalam penyelesaian sengketa dan pelatihan kepada pelaksana peradilan adat mengenai mekanisme pelaksanaan peradilan sehingga memahami tatacara proses persidangan.
Analisis Yuridis Saksi Testimonium De auditu dalam PerkaraItsbat Nikah di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Bireuen Tasrizal; Muhammad Rudi Syahputra; Alia Rahma
JOM Vol 6 No 3 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, September
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/ijhass.v6i3.8105

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal position of testimonium de auditu witnesses in itsbat nikah cases at the Mahkamah Syar’iyah Bireuen. Normatively, Indonesian civil procedure law through Article 171 HIR and Article 1907 of the Civil Code requires witnesses to provide testimony based on direct knowledge, thereby rejecting hearsay as valid evidence. However, in practice, especially in itsbat nikah cases where direct witnesses are often unavailable, judges frequently face demands to consider such testimony. Using a normative-empirical approach, this research combines legal analysis of statutory provisions and jurisprudence with field data from case studies and interviews with judges. The findings reveal that the Mahkamah Syar’iyah Bireuen consistently does not treat testimonium de auditu as primary evidence, but only as complementary proof that must be supported by other evidence such as documents or direct witness testimony. The implication is a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice, ensuring protection for women and children from unregistered marriages while maintaining procedural safeguards.
Digital Khitbah Among Muslims: The Legality and Ethical Challenge of Engagement Via Social Media Muhammad Rudi Syahputra; Tasrizal Tasrizal; Muksalmina Muksalmina; Muhammad Muhammad; Khairul Amri Ismail
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v10i1.12666

Abstract

This article explores the legal status of khitbah (engagement) conducted through social media platforms, particularly Facebook, in light of Shafi”˜i jurisprudence. In classical Islamic law, khitbah represents a preliminary stage of marriage, intended to establish mutual understanding and commitment prior to the solemnization of the marriage contract (”˜aqd al-nikāḥ). Traditionally, this practice has been carried out in face-to-face settings, mediated by families and community norms. However, the rapid development of communication technology has reconfigured modes of social interaction among Muslims, including those related to religiously significant practices such as khitbah. The study employs a qualitative library research approach, drawing upon primary Shafi”˜i fiqh sources such as MughnÄ« al-Muḥtāj (al-Khaá¹­Ä«b al-ShirbÄ«nÄ«), I”˜Änat al-ṬālibÄ«n (al-Shaṭā), and al-Fiqh al-IslāmÄ« wa Adillatuh (al-ZuḥaylÄ«), alongside contemporary scholarly debates in Islamic family law and digital communication studies. The findings demonstrate that a khitbah performed through social media is legally valid, since the principle al-kitābah ka-l-khiṭāb that written communication is equivalent to spoken communication is well established in Islamic jurisprudence. Thus, proposals made through text messages, social media posts, or digital calls fulfill the requirement of explicit (á¹£arīḥ) or indirect (ta”˜rīḍ) expression of intent. Nonetheless, while the legality of such practice is affirmed, ethical and social concerns remain paramount. The potential for deception, anonymity, and digital intimacy presents significant challenges that demand moral vigilance. Islamic ethics emphasizes safeguarding honor (”˜ird) and preventing harm (dharar), necessitating caution in applying classical rulings to modern contexts. The study concludes that social media-based khitbah reflects the adaptability of Islamic jurisprudence to new technological realities, while also underlining the importance of ethical discipline in digital religious practices.
Formalization and Documentation: Transforming the Aceh Customary Legal System in Dispute Resolution Through Mediation Syahputra, Muhammad Rudi; Tasrizal, Tasrizal; Ikramullah, Muhammad
SASI Volume 32 Issue 2, June 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v32i2.3771

Abstract

Introduction: Dispute resolution through customary courts in Aceh has long been conducted by community leader (keuchik, tuha peut, and imeum meunasah) through mediation based on deliberation, consensus, and the restoration of social harmony. In the modern legal context, this living and predominantly oral mechanism faces challenges when interacting with the formal legal system, which requires written procedures, documentary evidence, and stronger institutional accountability. Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze how formalization and documentation transform Aceh’s customary dispute resolution system, and to explain the challenges, opportunities, and institutional model required to integrate customary mediation with the national legal framework without weakening local wisdom. Methods of the Research: The research employs an empirical juridical method with a socio-legal approach. Data were collected through literature review, observations of mediation stages and interactions in selected gampong, and in-depth interviews with experienced customary leaders, representatives of the Aceh Customary Assembly (Majelis Adat Aceh), law enforcement officials, and community members involved in customary mediation. Results of the Research: The findings reveal that Aceh has established a regulatory framework supporting customary justice through Qanun Number 9/2008, Qanun Number 10/2008, and Qanun Number 8/2019, accompanied by growing documentation practices such as written minutes and peace agreements. Formalization strengthens procedural certainty, accountability, and coordination with formal justice, but it also faces tensions arising from differences in legal culture, local customary variations, limited administrative capacity, overlapping authority, and the absence of executory legal force for customary settlements. The novelty of this study lies in formulating a flexible model of customary mediation that standardizes core procedural and documentary elements while preserving deliberation, consensus, kinship, and locally rooted sanctions as the substance of Acehnese customary justice.
Co-Authors Alia Rahma Ikramullah, Muhammad Khairul Amri Ismail Muhammad Muhammad Muhammad Rudi Syahputra Muksalmina Muksalmina Nurwijayanti