Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Erdianto, Dyta Widi
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
REFORMULASI KONSEP DIVERSI BERDASARKAN CITA HUKUM NON-DISKRIMINASI Airlangga, Rendy; Pradipta, Hizkia Andhian; Erdianto, Dyta Widi
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2023.v8.i1.p17-38

Abstract

The SPPA Law carries restorative justice approach in the form of diversion. The application of restorative approach in SPPA Law has the aim of protecting the child. However, the implementation adheres to discriminatory requirements. The formulation of the problems are: (1) What are the ideal conditions for diversion? (2) What are the problems in the diversion agreement? The method that being used in this study is normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approach. The application of diversion should be executed for all ABH. Diversion requirements limit the application of restorative justice and provide space to take revenge on ABH. The diversion agreement can create a sense of injustice in society. Reconciliation and return to parents are not an effective way of diversion. Participation in education and community service should be the key so that ABH do not repeat their actions.
Legal Validity of HGB Extension Over Management Rights in Surabaya: Keabsahan Hukum Perpanjangan HGB di Atas Hak Pengelolaan di Surabaya Erdianto, Dyta Widi; Raharja, Gede Dimas Bayu Hardi; Wicaksana, Satya Adi; Sofia, Arijna Nurin
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijins.v26i2.1012

Abstract

General Background: Land tenure rights, particularly Building Use Rights (HGB) over Management Rights (HPL), play a crucial role in Indonesia’s legal and economic landscape.Specific Background: Extending HGB over HPL requires approval from the HPL holder, leading to legal disputes when HGB holders are unaware of their land’s status.Knowledge Gap: Limited studies address the legal mechanisms for extending HGB over HPL, especially after Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021.Aims: This study analyzes the legal framework for HGB extensions over HPL and examines legal remedies for unaware HGB holders.Results: Findings show that approval from the HPL holder is mandatory for HGB extensions, and without it, applications are rejected. Court rulings confirm this requirement.Novelty: This study clarifies recent regulatory changes and their impact on landowners.Implications: Clearer legal frameworks and better land status verification are needed to prevent disputes and ensure compliance. Highlights: Mandatory Approval: HGB extensions over HPL require approval from the HPL holder; otherwise, they are legally invalid. Regulatory Impact: Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 reinforces strict conditions for HGB extensions, affecting landowners. Legal Remedies: HGB holders unaware of their land’s HPL status must pursue legal verification and compliance to secure extensions. Keywords: Extension of Term, Building Rights Title, Land Utilisation, Management Rights
Co-Authors Airlangga, Rendy Pradipta, Hizkia Andhian Raharja, Gede Dimas Bayu Hardi Sofia, Arijna Nurin Wicaksana, Satya Adi