Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL LEGAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE FRAMEWORK OF HEART TRANSPLANTATION IN INDONESIA Yasarman
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Responsive Pancasila law that nurtures and protects can be realized if the law is able to provide a sense of security and peace to the life of the nation and state and to the people as a whole. The law becomes a place of protection and protection for the people from actions that threaten and destroy the sense of security, peace and human rights. Just law based on Pancasila is a formulation of justice that is carried out in Indonesian society, which is justice which emphasizes the balance between rights and obligations, namely the right to enjoy the results of development with the obligations of darma and service. With this formulation of justice, the development of national law in the constitutional state of Pancasila basically aims to protect: (1) the entire Indonesian nation, (2) all Indonesian blood, (3) the ideals and goals of the Indonesian nation, (4) Indonesian society and individuals (5) soul, individual freedom, honor, and property, (6) implementation of development (law must function as a means of supporting the development of modernization and comprehensive development).

Rekonstruksi Mengenai Pengaturan dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial Dwi Jayanti Putri; Yasarman
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 3 (2022): October 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Abstrak Pelanggaran hukum terkait ujaran kebencian di dunia maya sangat marak sekali dilakukan oleh masyarakat terbukti dari data yang diperolehpenerapan dari Direktorat Tindak Pidana Siber Polri bahwa kejahatan dunia maya semakin tahun semakin meningkat. Ketentuan pidana juga telah diatur di dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, dimana orang yang terbukti bersalah akan dijatuhi hukuman maksimal 6 (enam) tahun pidana penjara atau denda maksimal Rp. 1.000.000.000.00,- (Satu Miliar Rupiah). Selain itu, penegakan hukum telah dilaksanakan secara maksimal dengan melibatkan tim khusus siber Polri guna meminimalisir kejahatan dunia maya terkait dengan ujaran kebencian. Para pelaku ujaran kebencian wajib mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya di muka hukum. Pertanggungjawaban pidana telah diatur secara terperinci di dalam undang-undang. Hal yang mendasar adalah perbuatan ujaran kebencian merupakan perbuatan kejahatan di dunia maya yang menimbulkan dampak negatif. Kejahatan ini dilakukan oleh orang tanpa memandang usia selama mereka memiliki dan mampu menggunakan media sosial pada jejaring internet. Hal ini telah diatur di dalam undangundang untuk menentukan seseorang yang telah melakukan ujaran kebencian dapat dipidana atau tidak dalam mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya di muka hukum Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Ujaran Kebencian, Media Sosial Abstract Violations of the law related to hate speech in cyberspace are very widely carried out by the public, as evidenced by data obtained from the Directorate of Cyber Crimes of the National Police that cybercrime is increasing year by year. Criminal provisions have also been regulated in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, where people who are found guilty will be sentenced to a maximum of 6 (six) years in prison or a maximum fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000,00 (One Billion Rupiah). In addition, law enforcement has been implemented optimally by involving the National Police's cyber special team to minimize cybercrime related to hate speech. Perpetrators of hate speech must be held accountable for their actions before the law. Criminal liability has been regulated in detail in the legislation. The basic thing is that hate speech is a crime in cyberspace that has a negative impact. These crimes are committed by people regardless of age as long as they have and are able to use social media on internet networks. This has been regulated in the law to determine whether or not a person who has committed hate speech can be convicted of his or her actions before the law Keywords: Accountability, Hate Speech, Social Media

Alternative Dispute Resolution In Medical Dispute Resolution: Initiating The Establishment Of An Alternative Medical Dispute Resolution Institution In Indonesia Istiana Sari; Yasarman
Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 02 (2025): Fox justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Edition 2025
Publisher : SEAN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Medical disputes are disputes that occur between a patient or a patient's family and a doctor/health worker or between a patient and a health facility regarding matters related to patient services, treatment and care. Resolving medical disputes through the courts takes a long time, the cost of cases is expensive, decisions do not always solve problems, cause estrangement between the parties, judges' decisions are unpredictable, judges do not understand the ins and outs of medicine. In some countries, 67.8% of medical disputes can be resolved through mediation. For this, Alternative Dispute Resolution or alternative dispute resolution outside the judicial system is needed.Alternative Dispute Resolution can be done by negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration. Medical dispute resolution with alternative dispute resolution in Indonesia has not been comprehensively regulated. There is no state institution that handles alternative medical dispute resolution in Indonesia. In this study, the researcher used a normative juridical research method. Normative qualitative research specifications with empirical, analytical descriptive, and analytical prescriptive. The conclusion reached is that medical problems are special and can be resolved by alternative dispute resolution. For this reason, an Alternative Medical Dispute Resolution Institution in Indonesia is needed.

Analisis Yuridis Akta Kesepakatan Dalam Transplantasi Ginjal Antara Calon Donor Dan Resipien (Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Hukum Indonesia): Legal Analysis Of The Deed Of Agreement In Kidney Transplantation Between Prospective Donor And Recipient (Review From Indonesian Legal Perspective) Sofiana; Jamiatur Robekha; Yasarman
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v12i1.14717

This study aims to analyze organ transplantation, especially the transfer of organs from living donors to recipients, which is one of the main therapies for patients with chronic kidney failure which aims to restore the patient's quality of life. In Indonesia, the implementation of organ transplantation still relies on living donors and has been regulated in laws and regulations that include provisions regarding the implementing hospital, the implementing medical team, and the advocacy team. The advocacy team plays a role in ensuring that the transplantation process runs without elements of commercialization and exploitation, and guarantees the fulfillment of the rights and obligations of prospective donors and their families. The legal problems that arise are how the legality and strength of the evidentiary deed of agreement between the donor and recipient as written evidence, and how it is protected in preventing illegal practices such as organ trafficking. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and legal document studies, and is analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the deed of agreement has a strategic position as valid legal evidence, as well as an instrument of ethical and legal protection for all parties involved in the transplant procedure. Therefore, a properly drafted deed of agreement not only fulfills the formal legal aspects, but also plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of the organ transplantation process in Indonesia.

Rekonstruksi Mengenai Pengaturan dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial Dwi Jayanti Putri; Yasarman
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 3 (2022): October 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i3.4145

Abstrak Pelanggaran hukum terkait ujaran kebencian di dunia maya sangat marak sekali dilakukan oleh masyarakat terbukti dari data yang diperolehpenerapan dari Direktorat Tindak Pidana Siber Polri bahwa kejahatan dunia maya semakin tahun semakin meningkat. Ketentuan pidana juga telah diatur di dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, dimana orang yang terbukti bersalah akan dijatuhi hukuman maksimal 6 (enam) tahun pidana penjara atau denda maksimal Rp. 1.000.000.000.00,- (Satu Miliar Rupiah). Selain itu, penegakan hukum telah dilaksanakan secara maksimal dengan melibatkan tim khusus siber Polri guna meminimalisir kejahatan dunia maya terkait dengan ujaran kebencian. Para pelaku ujaran kebencian wajib mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya di muka hukum. Pertanggungjawaban pidana telah diatur secara terperinci di dalam undang-undang. Hal yang mendasar adalah perbuatan ujaran kebencian merupakan perbuatan kejahatan di dunia maya yang menimbulkan dampak negatif. Kejahatan ini dilakukan oleh orang tanpa memandang usia selama mereka memiliki dan mampu menggunakan media sosial pada jejaring internet. Hal ini telah diatur di dalam undangundang untuk menentukan seseorang yang telah melakukan ujaran kebencian dapat dipidana atau tidak dalam mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya di muka hukum Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban, Ujaran Kebencian, Media Sosial Abstract Violations of the law related to hate speech in cyberspace are very widely carried out by the public, as evidenced by data obtained from the Directorate of Cyber Crimes of the National Police that cybercrime is increasing year by year. Criminal provisions have also been regulated in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, where people who are found guilty will be sentenced to a maximum of 6 (six) years in prison or a maximum fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000,00 (One Billion Rupiah). In addition, law enforcement has been implemented optimally by involving the National Police's cyber special team to minimize cybercrime related to hate speech. Perpetrators of hate speech must be held accountable for their actions before the law. Criminal liability has been regulated in detail in the legislation. The basic thing is that hate speech is a crime in cyberspace that has a negative impact. These crimes are committed by people regardless of age as long as they have and are able to use social media on internet networks. This has been regulated in the law to determine whether or not a person who has committed hate speech can be convicted of his or her actions before the law Keywords: Accountability, Hate Speech, Social Media

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 5 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 5 Documents
Search