M. Yustino Aribawa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

DUE TO THE LEGAL UNDERSTANDING OF PRIVATE Universities IN THE SHADOW OF DIFFERENT FOUNDATIONS (STUDY OF UNIVERSATION OF HEALTHY SOLAR AKBID INTO DR SOETOMO UNIVERSITY SURABAYA) Bachrul Amiq; M. Yustino Aribawa; Sri Astutik
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (238.653 KB) | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v4i2.459

Abstract

The large number of private universities in Indonesia creates a quality gap. The unification of private universities is a solution to improve the quality of private higher education. One of the successful ones is the Surya Sehat Midwifery Academy Surabaya with Dr Soetomo University Surabaya. However, the unification process still needs to be examined more deeply about the basic considerations for the unification between the two private universities and the legal consequences of the unification. The unification of the Surya Sehat Midwifery Academy with Dr Soetomo University resulted in the loss of the Surya Sehat Midwifery Academy in the higher education database and merged into Dr Soetomo University into a midwifery study program at the health sciences faculty. which is quite long, namely three years, causing legal uncertainty in the field. This should not need to happen if the government, in this case the Ministry of Education and Culture, applies a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for licensing and furthermore to avoid service barriers for alumni of the Surya Sehat Midwifery Academy Surabaya, it is necessary to include alumni data in the health sciences faculty database so that it is physically integrated. as well as virtually.
Wewenang Pemerintah dalam Perlindungan Hukum bagi Orang atau Badan yang Menyelenggarakan Pembangunan Perumahan dalam Undang- Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman Muhammad Muhammad; Bahrul Amiq; M. Yustino Aribawa
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i1.1343

Abstract

This research is based on the ambiguity of street naming norms in statutory regulations, this causes the legality of street naming in the Mojokerto city government area to be questioned. Based on this description, the author formulates the problem formulation as follows: (1) What is the authority of the Mojokerto City Government in naming roads? (2) What is the legality of naming roads belonging to the Mojokerto city government?This research uses a normative juridical research type with a statutory approach, a historical approach and a conceptual approach using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials.The research results from this thesis show that the Mojokerto City Government does not have direct authority to name roads in its area. There is a lack of normative legal regulations in regulating transitional conditions in the naming of landforms, especially roads. The legality of naming roads belonging to the Mojokerto city government can be questioned due to the absence of statutory norms that order local governments to form legal products related to street naming.
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Kewenangan Penamaan Jalan di Kota Mojokerto Muhammad Muhammad; Bahrul Amiq; M. Yustino Aribawa
Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Presidensial : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/presidensial.v2i1.531

Abstract

This research is based on the ambiguity of street naming norms in statutory regulations, this causes the legality of street naming in the Mojokerto city government area to be questioned.Based on this description, the author formulates the problem formulation as follows: (1) What is the authority of the Mojokerto City Government in naming roads? (2) What is the legality of naming roads belonging to the Mojokerto city government?.This research uses a normative juridical research type with a statutory approach, a historical approach and a conceptual approach using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials.The research results from this thesis show that the Mojokerto City Government does not have direct authority to name roads in its area. There is a lack of normative legal regulations in regulating transitional conditions in the naming of landforms, especially roads. The legality of naming roads belonging to the Mojokerto city government can be questioned due to the absence of statutory norms that order local governments to form legal products related to street naming.
Judicial Reasoning in Sidoarjo District Court Decision No. 199/Pid.Sus/2023: Corporate Criminal Liability in Environmental Crimes Samsul Hadi; Dudik Djaja Sidarta; Renda Aranggraeni; M. Yustino Aribawa
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1360

Abstract

This study analyzes the judicial reasoning behind Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo No. 199/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Sda, a landmark decision involving corporate criminal liability for environmental violations in Indonesia. The case centers on PT Surya Prima Semesta’s illegal disposal of hazardous waste (fly ash and bottom ash) without an environmental permit, resulting in the prosecution of its corporate director. Employing a normative juridical method, the research examines the court’s application of doctrines such as strict liability and identification theory within the framework of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. The findings show that the court adopted a formalistic, text-based legal reasoning model, treating permit violations as inherently punishable acts regardless of actual environmental harm. While the decision reinforces regulatory compliance and affirms corporate culpability, it lacks engagement with broader organizational responsibility and foundational environmental law principles like the precautionary principle and sustainability. This study argues for a more integrated doctrinal approach one that balances rule-based logic with value-oriented reasoning to enhance legal consistency, advance environmental justice, and align Indonesia’s corporate accountability framework with international standards.